Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02391337

Rate Control Therapy Evaluation in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF)

Atrial fibrillation is a common heart rhythm disturbance, causing important discomfort for patients, a high risk of stroke, frequent hospital admissions and a two-fold increase in death. The number of patients with this condition are expected to double in the next 20 years. Medications to control heart-rate are used in the majority of patients, although the choice of agent is often guided by local preference rather than evidence from controlled trials. Despite the fact that patients with atrial fibrillation have high rates of other cardiac conditions such as heart failure, clinicians have insufficient evidence to personalise the use of different therapies. This feasibility study will allow us to develop a range of methods that can characterise patients according to the pumping and relaxing function of the heart, the burden of symptoms and to identify new blood markers. In this way, the investigators hope to improve clinical practice guidelines, allowing doctors to prescribe appropriate treatments for the right patients.

The research will be focused around a randomised trial of two medication strategies, providing much-needed data on the comparison of digoxin and beta-blockers (two commonly-used drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation). It will also allow us to identify the best way to record patient-reported quality of life and develop robust techniques to determine heart function using non-invasive imaging, facilitating the conduct of a large-scale clinical trial. The key objectives of the research programme are to define the optimal medications for patients with atrial fibrillation and identify the most valid, reproducible and cost-effective methods to examine patients. The ultimate aim of the project is to improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation, benefiting patients, the National Health Service and the global community.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

City Hospital, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common cardiac condition that leads to a substantial burden on quality-of-life (QoL), an increased risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and death, and significant healthcare costs for the NHS. In addition to anti-coagulation and considerations for rhythm control therapy, most patients with AF are in need of pharmacological control of heart rate. This aspect of care has not received stringent investigation, with treatment guidelines based on small crossover studies and observational data rather than robust controlled trials. Beta-blocker monotherapy remains the first-line option in the current NICE AF guidelines consultation document, with digoxin only for sedentary patients, although this recommendation is based on 'very low-quality evidence'. The benefit of different rate-control therapies on symptoms and other intermediate outcomes (such as left-ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] and diastolic function) are unknown, as are their effects on clinical events such as hospitalisation. This situation is unacceptable in light of the potential benefits and risk of different rate-control options in AF. It also limits our ability to personalise treatment according to patient characteristics.

The RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial is informed by a number of in-depth systematic reviews of management and clinical outcomes in AF patients. Taken together, this information provides a sound basis to plan a major randomised controlled trial (RCT). However as trials of rate-control in AF have typically been small or uncontrolled, further information is needed before designing a trial that can assess clinical outcomes. The RATE-AF trial will allow us to define appropriate primary and secondary outcome measures and their standard deviation in a contemporary population of patients with permanent AF. This information will allow us to estimate sample size, determination of recruitment, retention and adherence policies, and to ascertain the best methods of obtaining adverse event data and reliable economic costs for a larger trial assessing cardiovascular outcomes and hospitalization. The RATE-AF trial will also be the largest RCT of its kind, allowing us to compare the effect of beta-blockers and digoxin on QoL as initial rate-control therapy in patients with permanent AF. The long-term aim of the research is to answer key questions about how to initiate therapy, stratified by relevant patient characteristics such as systolic and diastolic cardiac function, baseline symptoms and concurrent medication. The research will also define the patho-physiological mechanisms underlying AF-related symptoms, left-ventricular function and their association with adverse clinical outcomes, and to identify clinical markers for the response to different rate control therapy.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 60 years or older, able to provide informed written consent
  • Permanent AF, characterised (at time of randomisation) as a physician decision for rate-control with no plans for cardioversion, anti-arrhythmic medication, or ablation therapy
  • Symptoms of breathlessness (New York Heart Association Class II or more)
  • Able to provide written, informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Established indication for beta-blocker therapy, e.g. survived myocardial infarction in the last 6 months
  • Known contraindications for therapy with beta-blockers or digoxin, e.g. a history of severe bronchospasm that would preclude use of beta-blockers, or known intolerance to these medications
  • Baseline heart rate <60 bpm
  • Known intolerance of beta-blockers or digoxin
  • A history of severe bronchospasm (e.g. due to asthma) that would preclude use of beta-blockers
  • Baseline heart rate <60 bpm
  • History of second or third-degree heart block
  • Supraventricular arrhythmias associated with accessory conducting pathways (e.g. Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) or a history of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation
  • Planned pacemaker implantation, pacemaker-dependent rhythm or history of atrioventricular node ablation
  • Decompensated heart failure (evidenced by need for intravenous inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 14 days prior to randomisation
  • A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis
  • Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation
  • Initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (with/without defibrillator) within 6 months prior to randomisation
  • Intravenous infusions for heart failure (inotropes, vasodilators or diuretics) within 7 days prior to randomisation
  • A current diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis or constrictive pericarditis
  • Received or on waiting list for heart transplantation
  • Receiving renal replacement therapy
  • Major surgery, including thoracic or cardiac surgery, within 3 months of randomisation
  • Severe, concomitant non-cardiovascular disease (including malignancy) that is expected to reduce life expectancy

Treatment and study plan

Bisoprolol

Drug

Drug intervention

Digoxin

Drug

Drug intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Reported Quality of Life (SF-36)

    Time frame: Primary outcome at 6 months timepoint.

    Patient-reported outcomes as assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire physical component score.

    The physical component score ranges from 0-100 where higher value indicates better outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

    Time frame: 12 months

    The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices

  2. Diastolic Function- Measured by the E/e'.

    Time frame: 12 months

    The above parameters will be measured using echocardiography and diastolic indices.

    E/e' - the ratio between early mitral inflow velocity and mitral annular early diastolic velocity.

  3. B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at 6 Months.

    Time frame: 6 months

    B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 6 months.

  4. Composite Functional Status Measures- 6 Minute Walking Distance at 12 Months.

    Time frame: 12 months

    Composite functional status measures- 6 minute walking distance at 12 months.

  5. Patient Reported Outcomes- (AFEQT) at 12 Months.

    Time frame: 12 months

    As assessed using the AFEQT overall score at 12 months. The range for AFEQT overall score is from 0= complete disability to 100=no disability.

  6. Patient Reported Outcomes (SF36) Version 2 at 12 Months.

    Time frame: 12 months

    As assessed using the SF-36 version 2 global and specific scores at 12 months. All domains presented are between 0 to 100 scale where the higher score indicates better outcomes.

  7. Patient Reported Outcomes (EQ-5D-5L)

    Time frame: 12 months

    As assessed using the EQ-5D-5L summary index questionnaires at both 6 and 12 months.

    The range for summary index is from -0.594=worst score to 1=best score

  8. Ambulatory Heart-rate.

    Time frame: Within 12 months

    24 hour ambulatory heart-rate.

Other outcomes

  1. Cardiovascular Events

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of Participants with hospital admissions for cardiovascular events.

  2. Drug Discontinuation Rate

    Time frame: 12 months

    the number and extent to which patients discontinue trial drugs

  3. Drug Discontinuation Rate Within 12 Months.

    Time frame: 12 months

    Number of participants requiring drug discontinuation due to adverse reactions.

  4. Hospital Admission Rate

    Time frame: 12 months

    A composite of adverse clinical events

  5. Retention of Participants

    Time frame: 12 months

    Convenience, compliance and cross-over data

  6. Preferred Outcome Measures for This Cohort of Patients

    Time frame: 12 months

    Establish which are the best measures for these patients

  7. Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.

    Time frame: 12 months

    SF-36 physical function score at 6 and 12 months

  8. Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.

    Time frame: 12 months

    SF-36 overall score at 6 and 12 months

  9. Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.

    Time frame: 12 months

    AFEQT overall score at 6 and 12 months

  10. Population-specific Standard Deviations to Enable Sample Size Calculation for a Future Trial Powered to Detect a Difference in Hospital Admissions.

    Time frame: 12 months

    LVEF and E/e scores at 6 and 12 months

  11. Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospital Admissions.

    Time frame: During the 12 month follow-up period.

    Number of Participants with Unplanned Hospital Admissions.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Birmingham

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating Different Rate Control Therapies in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Randomised, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint Feasibility Pilot Comparing Digoxin and Beta-blockers as Initial Rate Control Therapy

Acronym: RATE-AF

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 18, 2015
Registry last updated
Jun 18, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.