Southwestern Uganda
Mbarara, Uganda
NCT Number: NCT03553693
The RAPID-VL study will take place in 20 HIV care health facilities in Southwestern Uganda. The study will test the hypothesis that a multi-component intervention package that targets barriers to efficient and timely HIV viral load (VL) testing will improve test ordering, speed up result turnaround times, and improve the quality of VL results counseling to patients. Phase 1 of the study will consist of a 1-year retrospective medical record review in all participating health facilities. In Phase 2 the intervention will be introduced in 10 randomly chosen health facilities, while the remaining 10 sites will continue with standard VL testing and counseling operations. The study will measure the speed and efficiency of VL testing, experiences of patients and clinicians with the intervention, and the cost of the intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mbarara, Uganda
We will test the hypothesis that a multi-component intervention grounded in implementation science principles and that targets key barriers to optimal HIV viral load (VL) processing will improve viral load ordering, speed up viral load turnaround, and improve the quality of viral load counseling of results to patients within a Ugandan network of HIV care clinics. Specific objectives are as follows: Objective 1: Determine the comparative effectiveness of the RAPID-VL intervention on VL ordering and VL turnaround time: We will randomize 20 HIV clinics to the RAPID-VL multi-component intervention vs. standard of care VL procedures (n=10 clinics each, 60 patients/health facility). Objective 2: Identify facilitators and barriers to implementation, and perceived utility of the RAPID-VL intervention from both the patient and clinician perspectives. Objective 3: Determine the costs, cost-effectiveness, and incremental change costs of the RAPID-VL intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Phase 1, Intervention and Control Clinics:
"High risk" subgroups of patients (n=10 each per clinic, total of 40 per clinic): registered for care, with a clinic visit within a year of the Phase 1 start date, plus the following:
"Non-high-risk" patients (n=20 per clinic): Inclusion criteria (1) adult (age ≥18 years), (2) registered for care, with clinic visit within a year of the Phase 1 start date, (3) already on ART or starting ART at time of study enrollment, (4) do not meet any of the inclusion criteria of a "high risk" subgroup
Phase 2, Intervention Clinics:
We will select 60 patients in each of the 10 intervention clinics (600 patients total; different than the 60 patients in each clinic studied in Phase 1), with inclusion criteria as follows:
"High risk" subgroups of patients (n=10 each per clinic, total of 40 per clinic): registered for care, with a clinic visit within a year of the Phase 2 start date; able to consent for study participation; plus the following:
"Non-high-risk" patients (n=20 per clinic): Inclusion criteria: (1) adult (age ≥18 years), (2) registered in the general HIV clinic, (3) already on ART or starting ART at time of study enrollment, (4) do not meet any of the inclusion criteria of a "high risk" subgroup
Phase 2, Control Clinics:
We will select 60 patients in each of the 10 control clinics (600 patients total; different than the 60 patients in each clinic studied in Phase 1), with inclusion criteria as follows
"High risk" subgroups of patients (n=10 each per clinic, total of 40 per clinic): registered for care, with a clinic visit within a year of the Phase 1 start date; able to provide consent; plus the following:
"Non-high-risk" patients (n=20 per clinic): Inclusion criteria: (1) adult (age ≥18 years), (2) registered for care, with clinic visit within a year of the Phase 2 start date, (3) already on ART or starting ART at time of study enrollment, (4) do not meet any of the inclusion criteria of a "high risk" subgroup
Exclusion criteria
None
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of patients who had a VL ordered when indicated by country guidelines
Time frame: 1 year
Mean turnaround time in days from VL ordering to delivery of results to patient
Time frame: 12 months after the start of Phase 2 of trial
Proportion of subjects suppressed 12 months after start of RAPID-VL participation
Time frame: 1 year
Proportion of patients with a positive (unsuppressed) VL whose next subsequent VL was suppressed
Time frame: 1 year
Number of patients who switched to a 2nd line ART regimen for any reason
Time frame: 12 months after the start of Phase 2 of trial
Establishment of a process for data transfer to Uganda's Central Public Health Laboratory (CPHL) (yes/no)
Time frame: 12 months after the start of Phase 2 of trial
Proportion of VL results generated in study that are present in CPHL database at study end
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Optimizing HIV Viral Load Monitoring and Outcomes for High Risk Populations
Acronym: RAPID-VL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06125509
HIV
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07225894
Behavior, HIV
Kisumu, Kisumu County, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT02447159
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Eket, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
View Trial DetailsNCT03734393
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details