This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection will be randomly assigned to two groups: the liposomal bupivacaine group, which will undergo erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine, and the bupivacaine hydrochloride group, which will receive erector spinae plane block with bupivacaine hydrochloride. Quality of recovery-15 score (QoR-15) and other outcome measures will be observed, and our hypothesis is that erector spinae plane block with liposomal bupivacaine can enhance patients' quality of recovery-15 score (QoR-15) at 48 h.
In the anesthesia induction suite, the anesthesiologist administers an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block prior to the induction of general anesthesia. The procedure involves the sequential injection of 10 mL of normal saline, followed by the administration of 0.5% bupivacaine HCL 20ml or 1.33% liposomal bupivacaine 20ml.
Postoperatively, the following analgesic protocols are administered routinely:
Basic analgesia: Parecoxib sodium (a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) 40 mg, every 12 hours;Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA): A background infusion of sufentanil at 2 μg/h, with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) boluses of sufentanil 2 μg and a lockout period of 15 minutes;Postoperative rescue analgesia: If NRS score is ≥ 4, the attending physician will administer rescue analgesia, which will be documented in the medical record.
Safety reporting: Any unexpected complications that may arise from this trial will be documented and reported to the principal investigator and the relevant hospital patient safety board.
Sample size and justification: The primary outcome will be the QoR-15 score at 48 hours post operatively.According to published studies on quality of recovery, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the QoR-15 score after surgery is 8. For major surgeries, the standard deviation (SD) of postoperative QoR-15 scores typically ranges from 10 to 16, and an SD of 12 was selected for this study. Using a two-tailed test with a significance level of α=0.05 and a test power of 1-β=0.8, the sample size calculated for each group (for comparison between the two groups) was 36 participants. With an estimated dropout rate of 10%, the final sample size was determined to be 40 participants per group, resulting in a total sample size of 80 participants.