Robert Bosch Medical Center
Stuttgart, 70376, Germany
NCT Number: NCT05251545
The single procedure success rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) varies between 80 and 90 %.
This prospective, randomized study investigated the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with RF-energy following the CLOSE protocol with standard energy application (30 Watts) versus PVI with RF-energy with high power settings (45 Watts).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stuttgart, 70376, Germany
A total number of 176 patients undergoing de-novo catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF are planned to be randomized to two different treatment arms. In group-A patients, PVI was performed with RF-energy with standard power settings of 30 Watts in a temperature-controlled mode.
The ablation procedure in group B was performed with RF-energy with higher power settings of 45 Watts. In both groups the ablation is performed with ablation index (AI) and following the CLOSE protocol (AI and ≤ 6 mm interlesion distance using a surround flow catheter, Biosense Webster Thermocool STSF).
A total of 88 patients are planned to be randomized into each group, the follow-up period will be 12 months after the first procedure.
The primary endpoint is freedom of all atrial arrhythmias after one procedure. The secondary endpoint is procedural time. The third endpoint is safety.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparison of power levels in catheter ablation in regard of single procedure success rate (freedom of any atrial arrhythmia with a duration of more than 30 sec. 45 Watts versus standard power levels (30 Watts).
Time frame: 1 year
Freedom of any atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 sec during a follow-up period of 12 months after the first procedure.
Time frame: 1 year
procedural time
Robert Bosch Medical Center
Other
Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using High Power - Short Duration Versus Ablation Index: a Prospective Randomized Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06172699
Ablation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06271967
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT05445297
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT05461859
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rzeszów, Poland
View Trial Details