Sørlandet sykehus HF
Arendal, Agder, 4838, Norway
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06983639
From observational studies, it is know that the risk of developing colorectal cancer after polyp removal is lower if the patients adheres to surveillance recommendations. However, colonoscopy is burdensome for patients and colonoscopy availability is limited in many parts of the world. In addition, more than half of surveillance colonoscopies are without any findings. The trial investigates whether surveillance using fecal testing for blod is as good as colonoscopy after removal of colorectal polyps.
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Arendal, Agder, 4838, Norway
Location status: Recruiting
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world and develops from benign colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy with polyp removal reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Patients who have had polyps removed are at increased risk for metachronous polyps and subsequent cancer and are referred to colonoscopic surveillance at regular intervals, the first one usually scheduled three years after polypectomy. Today, these comprise 15-25% of all colonoscopies, but in >85%, no high-risk pathology is found. Thus, post-polypectomy surveillance consumes major resources without benefit to the patients, and these resources are much needed for colonoscopies due to other indications in an aging population. Additionally, colonoscopy requires burdensome bowel-cleansing, discomfort during the examination, absenteeism from work and sometimes need for an escort. Severe complications like bleeding and perforation may occur. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of benign lesions occur in a large proportion of examinations as most polyps will never develop into colorectal cancer, even if left untreated.
Sensitive fecal occult blood tests (FIT) have been developed that may detect colorectal cancer with the same sensitivity as colonoscopy. The test is cheap, is easily distributed by mail and may be performed at home. If the test detects blood, colonoscopy is indicated. FIT has been used in colorectal screening program for years, but has not yet been thoroughly investigated for post-polypectomy surveillance purposes.
The trial is a pragmatic non-inferiority randomized trial in which patients who are eligible for 3-year colonoscopic surveillance are offered either colonoscopy (standard care) or FIT followed by a colonoscopy in case of a positive test result (Figure 1). FIT may decrease colonoscopy surveillance demand by > 50%, which equals a cost saving of almost 30,000,000 Norwegian kroner annually. By proposing FIT for post-polypectomy surveillance, the trial introduce decentralized and personalized medical follow-up of these patients, and at the same time reduce work-absenteeism, patient discomfort, risk of complications and importantly: overdiagnosis and overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Fecal testing for blood as surveillance efter polyp removal
Colonoscopy after polyp removal according to guidelines
Time frame: 12 years from randomization
Time frame: 12 years from randomization
Time frame: 3 years from randomization
Findings of colorectal cancer and high-risk polyps
Time frame: 12 years from randomization
Pathology detected during colonoscopy in both arms
Time frame: 12 years after randomization
Number of colonoscopies performed
Time frame: 12 years from randomization
Adherence with colonoscopy and FIT surveillance recommendations. Proportion of participants in each arm who are invited for colonoscopy or FIT surveillance and who actually adheres submit the FIT/undergo colonoscopy.
Time frame: 12 years from randomization
Total cost for FIT-surveillance and colonoscopy surveillance will be calculated and compared, including reimbursement (FIT, colonoscopy, pathology assessment), payment from patients, travel, absenteism from work, cost of complications etc.
Time frame: 30 days after colonoscopy
Adverse events after colonoscopy
Time frame: 12 years after randomization
The carbon footprint in each arm will be calculated and compared. Carbon footprint is the total carbon emission from manufacturing, shipping, use, prosessing, litter-handling etc
Time frame: 3 years after randomization
Sensitivity, specificity, postive predictive value and negative predicitive value for colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia at different FIT-thresholds
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Michael Bretthauer
CONTACT
Øyvind Holme
CONTACT
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Other Gov
FIT Versus Colonoscopy for Post-polypectomy Surveillance
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06603519
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Neoplasms
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03072472
Adenoma, Colonic Diseases
South Shields, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT00969124
Adenoma, Colonic Diseases
Celebration, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01044732
Adenoma, Colonic Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details