Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06983639

Randomized Trial Comparing Fecal Testing (FIT) to Colonoscopy for Post-polypectomy Surveillance

From observational studies, it is know that the risk of developing colorectal cancer after polyp removal is lower if the patients adheres to surveillance recommendations. However, colonoscopy is burdensome for patients and colonoscopy availability is limited in many parts of the world. In addition, more than half of surveillance colonoscopies are without any findings. The trial investigates whether surveillance using fecal testing for blod is as good as colonoscopy after removal of colorectal polyps.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

40 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sørlandet sykehus HF

Arendal, Agder, 4838, Norway

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Chief of gastroenterology, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

004792660445

About this study

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world and develops from benign colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy with polyp removal reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Patients who have had polyps removed are at increased risk for metachronous polyps and subsequent cancer and are referred to colonoscopic surveillance at regular intervals, the first one usually scheduled three years after polypectomy. Today, these comprise 15-25% of all colonoscopies, but in >85%, no high-risk pathology is found. Thus, post-polypectomy surveillance consumes major resources without benefit to the patients, and these resources are much needed for colonoscopies due to other indications in an aging population. Additionally, colonoscopy requires burdensome bowel-cleansing, discomfort during the examination, absenteeism from work and sometimes need for an escort. Severe complications like bleeding and perforation may occur. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of benign lesions occur in a large proportion of examinations as most polyps will never develop into colorectal cancer, even if left untreated.

Sensitive fecal occult blood tests (FIT) have been developed that may detect colorectal cancer with the same sensitivity as colonoscopy. The test is cheap, is easily distributed by mail and may be performed at home. If the test detects blood, colonoscopy is indicated. FIT has been used in colorectal screening program for years, but has not yet been thoroughly investigated for post-polypectomy surveillance purposes.

The trial is a pragmatic non-inferiority randomized trial in which patients who are eligible for 3-year colonoscopic surveillance are offered either colonoscopy (standard care) or FIT followed by a colonoscopy in case of a positive test result (Figure 1). FIT may decrease colonoscopy surveillance demand by > 50%, which equals a cost saving of almost 30,000,000 Norwegian kroner annually. By proposing FIT for post-polypectomy surveillance, the trial introduce decentralized and personalized medical follow-up of these patients, and at the same time reduce work-absenteeism, patient discomfort, risk of complications and importantly: overdiagnosis and overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • High-quality baseline colonoscopy with adequat cleansing and cecal intubation
  • Remocval of at least one advanced adenoma
  • Clean colon (all polyps removed)
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Colorectal cancer
  • History of surgical colon resection for any reason
  • Genetic cancer syndrome (adenomatous or serrated polyposis syndrome; Lynch or Lynch-like syndrome)
  • ≥ 10 adenomas at baseline colonoscopy (cumulative)
  • History of advanced serrated lesion, defined as SSL≥ 10mm or with dysplasia
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • On-going palliative care for any reason

Treatment and study plan

Fecal occult blood testing

Diagnostic Test

Fecal testing for blood as surveillance efter polyp removal

Colonoscopy

Diagnostic Test

Colonoscopy after polyp removal according to guidelines

Primary outcomes

  1. Colorectal cancer incidence

    Time frame: 12 years from randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Colorctal cancer mortality

    Time frame: 12 years from randomization

  2. Advanced neoplasia incidence

    Time frame: 3 years from randomization

    Findings of colorectal cancer and high-risk polyps

  3. Findings at colonoscopy

    Time frame: 12 years from randomization

    Pathology detected during colonoscopy in both arms

  4. Colonoscopy utilization

    Time frame: 12 years after randomization

    Number of colonoscopies performed

  5. Adherence

    Time frame: 12 years from randomization

    Adherence with colonoscopy and FIT surveillance recommendations. Proportion of participants in each arm who are invited for colonoscopy or FIT surveillance and who actually adheres submit the FIT/undergo colonoscopy.

  6. Cost-effectiveness

    Time frame: 12 years from randomization

    Total cost for FIT-surveillance and colonoscopy surveillance will be calculated and compared, including reimbursement (FIT, colonoscopy, pathology assessment), payment from patients, travel, absenteism from work, cost of complications etc.

  7. Adverse events

    Time frame: 30 days after colonoscopy

    Adverse events after colonoscopy

  8. Carbon footprint

    Time frame: 12 years after randomization

    The carbon footprint in each arm will be calculated and compared. Carbon footprint is the total carbon emission from manufacturing, shipping, use, prosessing, litter-handling etc

  9. FIT accuracy

    Time frame: 3 years after randomization

    Sensitivity, specificity, postive predictive value and negative predicitive value for colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia at different FIT-thresholds

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Michael Bretthauer

CONTACT

[email protected]

004790132480

Øyvind Holme

CONTACT

[email protected]

004738073000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sorlandet Hospital HF

Other Gov

Collaborators

  • Gødstrup Hospital
  • Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
  • Helse Stavanger HF
  • Helsinki University Central Hospital
  • Horsens Hospital
  • Randers Regional Hospital
  • St. Olavs Hospital
  • Sykehuset Ostfold
  • Sykehuset Telemark Hospital Trust
  • Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
  • Turku University Hospital
  • University Hospital of North Norway
  • University Hospital, Akershus
  • Vestre Viken Hospital Trust
  • Viborg Regional Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

FIT Versus Colonoscopy for Post-polypectomy Surveillance

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2040
Study completion
2050
First posted
May 21, 2025
Registry last updated
Jan 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.