Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07713914

Randomized Study of Triple Therapy vs Sildenafil Dose Optimization in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease characterized by increased pressure in the pulmonary arteries, leading to right heart failure and premature death. Although combination therapy has improved outcomes, many patients remain at intermediate or high clinical risk despite treatment.

When patients do not reach low-risk status, treatment escalation is recommended. However, different escalation strategies are used in clinical practice, including increasing the dose of existing medications or adding a third drug that targets a different biological pathway. There is limited prospective randomized evidence directly comparing these approaches.

The ASCEND-PAH study is a prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial designed to compare two therapeutic escalation strategies in adults with PAH who remain at intermediate or high risk despite dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil. Participants will be randomized to either: (1) escalation to triple therapy with the addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent, or (2) optimization of dual therapy by increasing the dose of sildenafil.

The primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients who improve their risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum risk model within 3 to 6 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include changes in functional status, exercise capacity, biomarkers, clinical worsening, safety, and treatment persistence

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Instituto do Coração (InCor), Hospital das Clínicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo

São Paulo, 04551-060, Brazil

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Caio Fernandes, Principal Investigator

CONTACT

[email protected]

1126615034

About this study

This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial designed to evaluate therapeutic escalation strategies in adults with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, Group 1) who remain at intermediate-low, intermediate-high, or high risk according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model despite stable dual therapy.

Eligible participants must be receiving an endothelin receptor antagonist in combination with sildenafil and have a clinical indication for treatment escalation. After confirmation of eligibility and baseline assessments, participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two strategies:

Escalation to triple therapy through addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent (inhaled iloprost or selexipag), according to clinical judgment and availability.

Optimization of dual therapy by increasing the dose of sildenafil according to clinical practice.

Baseline assessments may include WHO functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and BNP or NT-proBNP levels obtained within 90 days prior to randomization. Follow-up evaluation will occur between 3 and 6 months after randomization, with the primary analysis based on the assessment closest to 6 months within that window.

The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients who achieve improvement in risk stratification, defined as a decrease of at least one risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model. Secondary endpoints include composite clinical improvement and worsening, change in individual clinical parameters, time to clinical worsening, safety outcomes, need for additional therapeutic escalation, and treatment persistence.

The study is powered to detect a clinically meaningful absolute difference of 20 percentage points in risk improvement between groups, with planned enrollment of approximately 196 participants to account for potential losses to follow-up

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, Group 1) confirmed according to accepted clinical and hemodynamic criteria
  • Stable treatment with an endothelin receptor antagonist in combination with sildenafil prior to randomization
  • Classified as intermediate-low, intermediate-high, or high risk according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model
  • Clinical indication for therapeutic escalation
  • Availability for follow-up assessment between 3 and 6 months after randomization
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial that mandates treatment modification
  • Known contraindication to prostacyclin pathway agents (including iloprost or selexipag)
  • Known contraindication to sildenafil dose escalation
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Women of childbearing potential not using effective contraception
  • Any clinical condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with study participation or outcome assessment

Treatment and study plan

Prostacyclin Pathway Agent

Drug

Addition of a prostacyclin pathway agent (inhaled iloprost or oral selexipag) to ongoing dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist and sildenafil as part of therapeutic escalation to triple therapy. The specific agent will be selected according to clinical judgment and availability. Dosing will follow approved labeling and routine clinical practice.

Other names: Iloprost, Selexipag

Sildenafil Dose Optimization

Drug

Optimization of sildenafil dose within approved dosing ranges as part of dual therapy with an endothelin receptor antagonist. Dose adjustments will be performed according to clinical practice to achieve maximal tolerated and guideline-recommended dosing without addition of a new PAH pathway agent at randomization.

Other names: Sildenafil

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Risk Stratification According to the COMPERA 2.0 Four-Stratum Model

    Time frame: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization (assessment closest to 6 months within the predefined window)

    Proportion of participants who achieve improvement in clinical risk category between baseline and follow-up, defined as a decrease of at least one risk category according to the COMPERA 2.0 four-stratum model (low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, high risk). Risk status is determined using World Health Organization functional class, 6-minute walk distance, and BNP or NT-proBNP levels, when available.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite Clinical Improvement at 3-6 Months

    Time frame: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization

    Proportion of participants who achieve composite clinical improvement between baseline and follow-up (3-6 months), defined as improvement in at least two of the following without worsening in any: (1) improvement of ≥1 WHO functional class; (2) increase of ≥30 meters in 6-minute walk distance; (3) reduction of ≥30% in BNP or NT-proBNP levels.

  2. Composite Clinical Worsening

    Time frame: From randomization through 6 months of follow-up

    Occurrence of clinical worsening defined as any of the following during follow-up: worsening of ≥1 WHO functional class; decrease of ≥30 meters in 6-minute walk distance; increase of ≥30% in BNP or NT-proBNP; need for additional therapeutic escalation; hospitalization related to pulmonary arterial hypertension; or death from any cause.

  3. Change in WHO Functional Class

    Time frame: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization

    Change in World Health Organization (WHO) functional class between baseline and follow-up. WHO functional class ranges from I (least severe) to IV (most severe), with higher classes indicating worse functional limitation.

  4. Change in 6-Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)

    Time frame: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization

    Absolute change in 6-minute walk distance (meters) between baseline and follow-up assessment.

  5. Change in BNP or NT-proBNP Levels

    Time frame: Between 3 and 6 months after randomization

    Percent change in BNP or NT-proBNP levels between baseline and follow-up. Higher values indicate greater cardiac strain and worse prognosis.

  6. Time to Clinical Worsening

    Time frame: From randomization through 6 months of follow-up

    Time from randomization to first occurrence of clinical worsening event as defined in the composite clinical worsening outcome.

  7. Treatment Persistence

    Time frame: From randomization through 6 months of follow-up

    Proportion of participants who remain on their initially assigned therapeutic strategy without permanent discontinuation by the follow-up visit.

  8. Safety and Adverse Events

    Time frame: From randomization through 6 months

    Incidence, type, and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events occurring during the study period.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Caio Fernandes, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+551126615034

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Triple Therapy Versus Sildenafil Dose Optimization in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Using COMPERA 2.0 Risk Stratification as the Primary Outcome

Acronym: ASCEND-PAH

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.