Continuous Glucose Monitor
DeviceDaily use of a continuous glucose monitor
Other names: Abbott FreeStyle Navigator, DexCom SEVEN, Medtronic Paradigm REAL-Time
NCT Number: NCT00406133
Subjects with intensively-treated type 1 diabetes and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0%-10.0% in 3 age groups (>25, 15-24, 8-14) will be randomized to a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) group or control group. The primary outcome is change in HbA1c after 26 weeks. A parallel randomized trial is being conducted for a second cohort with HbA1c <7.0% that will follow an identical protocol to that of the first cohort with HbA1c >=7.0%.
The >=7.0% trial was specifically designed and statistically powered to compare separately the impact of continuous versus standard intensive glucose monitoring in the three age groups. Both trials used standardized treatment algorithms and equivalent frequent contacts with subjects in both the CGM and control group.
After completion of the 26-week trial, the CGM group continues to use CGM for another 26 weeks to evaluate whether any beneficial effect seen in the first 6 months is sustained with longer-term use and less intensive contact and the control group initiates CGM use with less intensive contact after the first month than was provided at initiation of CGM use in the CGM group in the randomized trial.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me8 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
University of Southern California, Beverly Hills, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Daily use of a continuous glucose monitor
Other names: Abbott FreeStyle Navigator, DexCom SEVEN, Medtronic Paradigm REAL-Time
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
The primary outcome was the Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 26 weeks, as determined by a central laboratory (for the cohort with baseline HbA1c >=7.0% cohort).
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
The primary outcome was the change in the time per day with glucose values <=70mg/dL comparing baseline sensor values with those obtained following the 26-week visit.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Measure of the number of severe hypoglycemic events in the cohort with baseline HbA1c >=7.0% cohort
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding CGM were obtained after completion of the 26-week visit with the use of an unblinded device in the RT-CGM group and a blinded device in the Control group. Measure consists of minutes/day in range.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding CGM were obtained after completion of the 26-week visit with the use of an unblinded device in the RT-CGM group and a blinded device in the Control group. Measure consists of minutes/day in range.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding continuous glucose monitoring were obtained after completion of the 26-week visit with the use of an unblinded device in the RT-CGM group and a blinded device in the Control group. Measure consists of minutes/day in range.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding continuous glucose monitoring in both groups after the 26-week visit were used to estimate the amount of time per day the glucose level was hypoglycemic (<=70 mg/dL)
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding continuous glucose monitoring in both groups after the 26-week visit were used to estimate the amount of time per day the glucose level was hypoglycemic (<=50 mg/dL)
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Glucose variability was assessed by computing the absolute rate of change.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
The secondary outcome was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 26 weeks in the Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and Control groups (for the cohort with baseline HbA1c <7.0% cohort), as determined by a central laboratory.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding CGM were obtained after completion of the 26-week visit with the use of an unblinded device in the RT-CGM group and a blinded device in the Control group. Measure consists of minutes/day in range.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding CGM were obtained after completion of the 26-week visit with the use of an unblinded device in the RT-CGM group and a blinded device in the Control group. Measure consists of minutes/day in range.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding continuous glucose monitoring were obtained after completion of the 26-week visit with the use of an unblinded device in the RT-CGM group and a blinded device in the Control group. Measure consists of minutes/day in range.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Data regarding continuous glucose monitoring in both groups after the 26-week visit were used to estimate the amount of time per day the glucose level was hypoglycemic (<=50 mg/dL)
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Glucose variability was assessed by computing the absolute rate of change.
Time frame: 26 weeks
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey Total Score Average score of all items giving equal weight to each item. Scale 0-100 with higher score denoting more fear or more likely to avoid low blood glucose.
Time frame: 26 weeks
Estimated total costs divided by estimated Quality-Adjusted Life Weeks (QALW) calculated per group
Time frame: 26 weeks
Quality Adjusted Life Weeks: We collected experienced utility data by eliciting time tradeoff (TTO) utilities for overall experience. Patients were asked to consider their current state of health in comparison to life in perfect health. Experienced utilities were elicited at baseline, 13 weeks, and 26 weeks. For children aged <18 years, parents served as surrogates. The total quality-adjusted life weeks (QALWs) were calculated as the area under the quality-of-life time trends under each arm.
Time frame: 26 weeks
Investigators reported time spent with patients on CGM training and diabetes management excluding research time. Adult patients (or caregivers of children) self-reported health service utilization including routine office visits, after-hours clinic visits, emergency room visits, 911 calls, and hospitalizations. The daily cost of CGM technology was calculated based on FDA recommended frequency of sensor replacement and the expected frequency of receiver and transmitter replacement. The costs of the three devices used during the trial were averaged to arrive at a daily cost of CGM of $13.85. This daily cost was multiplied by the reported weekly use of CGM to arrive at an overall cost of CGM technology. Indirect costs: self-reported number of hours devoted to diabetes care per day, number of days missed from work or school due to diabetes, and number of days of work underperformance. Unit costs available at: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dc09-2042/DC1 (Table 1).
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
A relative decrease in A1c level >=10% was evaluated in logistic-regression models, adjusted for the baseline glycated hemoglobin level and clinical center.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
A relative increase in A1c level by >=10% was evaluated in logistic-regression models, adjusted for the baseline glycated hemoglobin level and clinical center.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
A relative decrease A1c level by >=0.5% was evaluated in logistic-regression models, adjusted for the baseline glycated hemoglobin level and clinical center.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
A relative increase by in A1c level >=0.5% was evaluated in logistic-regression models, adjusted for the baseline glycated hemoglobin level and clinical center.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
A 26-week A1c level <7.0% was evaluated in logistic-regression models, adjusted for the baseline glycated hemoglobin level and clinical center.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Other preplanned secondary outcomes included change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks in an ANCOVA model (adjusted for baseline HbA1c and clinical center) and 26-week binary HbA1c outcomes evaluated similarly in logistic regression models.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Other preplanned secondary outcomes included change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks in an ANCOVA model (adjusted for baseline HbA1c and clinical center) and 26-week binary HbA1c outcomes evaluated similarly in logistic regression models.
Time frame: Baseline and 26 weeks
Other preplanned secondary outcomes included change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks in an ANCOVA model (adjusted for baseline HbA1c and clinical center) and 26-week binary HbA1c outcomes evaluated similarly in logistic regression models.
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Other
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) in the Management of Type 1 Diabetes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05488119
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07696780
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05610111
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06308549
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Distress
Bad Mergentheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial Details