Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01529736

Randomized Study of Integration Success of Osseotite Dental Implants Placed Using Different Insertion Procedures

Osseotite implants placed with higher insertion torque (TEST procedure) will have higher initial stability and integration success than those placed with lower insertion torque forces.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Partial Edentulism Stomatognathic Diseases Tooth Disease Tooth Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidad Javeriana

Bogotá, Colombia

About this study

Osseotite implants will be placed using the standard lower insertion torque forces and compared to implants placed using higher insertion torque forces.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients of either sex and older than 18 years of age
  • patients needing a minimum of 3 implants to treat partial edentulism
  • patients physically able to tolerate surgical and restorative dental procedures
  • patients agreeing to all protocol visits

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with infection or severe inflammation at the intended treatment sites
  • patients smoking greater than 10 cigarettes per day
  • patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • patients with uncontrolled metabolic diseases
  • patients who received radiation treatment to the head in the past 12 months
  • patients needing bone grafting at the intended treatment sites
  • patients known to be pregnant at screening visit
  • patients with para-functional habits like bruxing and clenching

Treatment and study plan

High torque insertion

Procedure

Osseotite implant placed with high insertion torque forces

Other names: Osseotite endosseous dental implant

Low torque insertion

Procedure

Osseotite implant placed with low insertion torque forces

Other names: Osseotite endosseous dental implant

Primary outcomes

  1. primary stability countertorque measures

    Time frame: 4 months

    resistance to countertorque measures showing primary stability success of implants

Secondary outcomes

  1. cumulative success rate

    Time frame: 1 year

    Crestal bone regression (amount of bone loss measured) and equivalence in integration success (implant mobility)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

ZimVie

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized-controlled Study of the Integration Success of Osseotite Implants Placed With Different Insertion Procedures

Acronym: Pegasus

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 9, 2012
Registry last updated
Mar 28, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.