Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07236515

Randomized, Sham-Controlled Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis in Individuals With Peripheral Neuropathy

This study will evaluate a wearable device intended to support balance and gait in adults with peripheral neuropathy. Participants will use the device for a defined period, and outcomes related to safety, usability, and functional performance will be assessed.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This clinical investigation will assess a non-invasive wearable device designed to enhance gait and balance in individuals with peripheral neuropathy. The study will evaluate whether the device can improve balance and gait stability during daily activities, and will also examine safety, comfort, and overall user acceptability over the study period.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed informed consent prior to any study procedure
  • Adults ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, confirmed per site procedures and neurophysiological testing (e.g. NCV)
  • Gait or balance difficulties as self-reported and confirmed by Functional Gait Assessment (FGA score ≤ 23) and/or single-leg stance < 30 seconds
  • Able to walk without walking aids
  • Stable supplements and medications ≥ 1 month before baseline and willing to maintain stability during the investigation (same dosage and same medication within the last month)
  • Willingness and ability to attend weekly sessions, perform home use, and return for follow-up

Exclusion criteria

  • Untreated/unhealed lesion of any kind (e.g., wounds, swelling, infection, inflamed area of skin or eruptions on the lower leg (foot and ankle) or near product use (e.g., untreated lymphedema, phlebitis, thrombo-phlebitis or varicose veins)
  • Untreated/unhealed fractures in the foot and ankle
  • Cancerous growth in the planned treatment area
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease (e.g., gangrene)
  • Cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent or device use
  • Implanted electrical devices or pacemakers
  • Lower-limb orthoses/braces that cannot be removed for assessments
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females
  • Usage of other medical devices for the relief of neuropathic symptoms during the study
  • Current participation in any other clinical study using an investigational device or investigational drug
  • Orthopedic conditions substantially limiting gait (e.g., failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), recent hip or knee replacement, unstable fractures) as judged by the investigator
  • For patients who have been randomized in the active treatment group only: Incapability to perceive somatotopic sensations (tested at screening by MYNERVA staff)

Treatment and study plan

Active wearable device

Device

A non-invasive wearable device used to assess balance, gait, and usability in individuals with peripheral neuropathy.

Sham wearable device

Device

A sham version of the wearable device without active functionality.

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score

    Time frame: Change in Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score from baseline (day 0) to day 56.

    The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score

    Time frame: From baseline (day 0) to the end of the supervised period (day 28), change from day 28 to day 56, and evaluation of evolution across all timepoints, with and without stimulation

    The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks. To gain additional knowledge on whether there are changes between supervised and home-use phase

  2. Timed-up and Go (TUG) in seconds

    Time frame: Change from Baseline to day 56

    The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility. Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 metres at their usual pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time from the command to start until the participant is seated again is recorded in seconds. A shorter time indicates better functional mobility.

  3. Neuropathic pain symptoms (NPSI questionnaire)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to each of the follow-up time points (day 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 80)

    Captures changes in neuropathic pain intensity and quality.

  4. Quality of life (NORFOLK QOL-DN, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80

    Evaluates impact of intervention on daily function and well-being.

  5. Sensory function - Monofilament test

    Time frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28 and 56)

    Sensitivity to pressure and touch

  6. Sensory function - Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork test

    Time frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28, and 56)

    Semiquantitative measurement of vibration perception

  7. Sensory function - Sudoscan (subset of patients)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to day 56

    Evaluates peripheral sensory function and small-fiber integrity.

  8. Impact on fall risk: fall questionnaire

    Time frame: Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80

    Assessment of previous falls and falls during the study

  9. Neuroimaging (MRI) (subset of patients)

    Time frame: Change from baseline to day 56

    Exploratory mechanistic endpoint assessing effects of stimulation.

  10. Treatment compliance

    Time frame: Through home use phase of 4 weeks

    Based on the device logs that contain information on when treatment has been performed by the patients, patient's treatment compliance will be assessed.

  11. Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): step length in cm

    Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56

    Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.

  12. Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): step width in cm

    Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56

    Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.

  13. Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): center of mass sway in cm

    Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56

    Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.

  14. Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): heel-strike force in Newton

    Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56

    Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory - Sensory function - Temperature measurement using the thermal imaging camera

    Time frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 prestimulation to follow-up time points day 28 and 56

    Temperature distribution in the feet)

  2. Safety Outcome

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months

    All Adverse events (AEs): incidence, severity, seriousness, relatedness to device/procedures

  3. Safety Outcome

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months

    All Device deficiencies: number, type, corrective actions

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

MYNERVA AG

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multicenter Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis on Gait and Balance in Peripheral Neuropathy.

Acronym: MYN-L001-001

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
Nov 19, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 15, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.