Active wearable device
DeviceA non-invasive wearable device used to assess balance, gait, and usability in individuals with peripheral neuropathy.
NCT Number: NCT07236515
This study will evaluate a wearable device intended to support balance and gait in adults with peripheral neuropathy. Participants will use the device for a defined period, and outcomes related to safety, usability, and functional performance will be assessed.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hôpital de la Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland
This clinical investigation will assess a non-invasive wearable device designed to enhance gait and balance in individuals with peripheral neuropathy. The study will evaluate whether the device can improve balance and gait stability during daily activities, and will also examine safety, comfort, and overall user acceptability over the study period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A non-invasive wearable device used to assess balance, gait, and usability in individuals with peripheral neuropathy.
A sham version of the wearable device without active functionality.
Time frame: Change in Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score from baseline (day 0) to day 56.
The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks.
Time frame: From baseline (day 0) to the end of the supervised period (day 28), change from day 28 to day 56, and evaluation of evolution across all timepoints, with and without stimulation
The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks. To gain additional knowledge on whether there are changes between supervised and home-use phase
Time frame: Change from Baseline to day 56
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility. Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 metres at their usual pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time from the command to start until the participant is seated again is recorded in seconds. A shorter time indicates better functional mobility.
Time frame: Change from baseline to each of the follow-up time points (day 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 80)
Captures changes in neuropathic pain intensity and quality.
Time frame: Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Evaluates impact of intervention on daily function and well-being.
Time frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28 and 56)
Sensitivity to pressure and touch
Time frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28, and 56)
Semiquantitative measurement of vibration perception
Time frame: Change from baseline to day 56
Evaluates peripheral sensory function and small-fiber integrity.
Time frame: Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Assessment of previous falls and falls during the study
Time frame: Change from baseline to day 56
Exploratory mechanistic endpoint assessing effects of stimulation.
Time frame: Through home use phase of 4 weeks
Based on the device logs that contain information on when treatment has been performed by the patients, patient's treatment compliance will be assessed.
Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Time frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Time frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 prestimulation to follow-up time points day 28 and 56
Temperature distribution in the feet)
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
All Adverse events (AEs): incidence, severity, seriousness, relatedness to device/procedures
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
All Device deficiencies: number, type, corrective actions
MYNERVA AG
Industry
Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multicenter Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis on Gait and Balance in Peripheral Neuropathy.
Acronym: MYN-L001-001
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05950659
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07109817
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
The Bronx, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05404230
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Aalborg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT07095998
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Nervous System Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details