Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01397617

Randomized, Open Investigation Evaluating the Efficacy of Nobel Biocare SFB and CFB Implants

The purpose of this study is to determine the survival rate, marginal bone resorption, soft tissue health and maintenance of the NobelActive Internal and External implants and to make comparisons with the NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implant placed in healed sites.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine safety and efficacy parameters for the NobelActive Internal and External implants and to make comparisons with the NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implant placed in healed sites.

Safety: AEs

Efficacy:

  • survival rates,
  • marginal bone resorption with marginal bone levels measurement,
  • soft tissue health and maintenance via gingival index measurement, plaque index, papilla index .

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject should be in need of an implant supported fixed restoration
  • The subjects should have sufficient bone volume and density i.e. an osseous architecture in the planned implant placement region sufficient to receive implants with a diameter of 3.5 mm and a length of at least 10 mm.
  • The subject as well as the implant sites should fulfill criteria for immediate functional tem-porization within 24 h.
  • The implant sites should be healed and free from infection.

Exclusion criteria

  • Alcohol or drug abuse as noted in patient records or in patient history.
  • Health conditions, which do not permit the surgical procedure.
  • Reason to believe that the treatment might have a negative effect on the subject's total situation (psychiatric problems), as noted in patient records or in patient history.
  • The subject is not able to give her/his informed consent to participate.
  • The need of bone augmentation before implant installation to obtain a prosthetically correct implantation transversally. However, a minor augmentation procedure to cover exposed threads or interproximal / buccal grafting due to deficient sites is not an exclusion criteria.
  • Any disorders in the planned implant area such as previous tumors, chronic bone disease, or previous irradiation.
  • Uncontrolled diabetics will be excluded.
  • Severe bruxism or other destructive habits.
  • Immediate insertion (e.g. placement of the implant immediately after extraction) consti-tutes an exclusion criterion.

Treatment and study plan

NobelActive Internal implant

Device

Dental implant

NobelActive External implant

Device

Dental implant

NobelReplace Tapered Groovy implant

Device

Dental implant

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Endpoint Was the Change in Marginal Bone Levels (in mm) From the Time of Implant Insertion to Follow-up Visits (3,6,12,24,36 and 60 Months).

    Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months and 60 months

    Marginal bone remodeling is calculated for each side of the implant (mesial and distal) separately, as the difference between bone levels at two time points. The average of mesial and distal remodeling is then calculated for each implant site (paired for each side between two different points). Negative numbers indicate bone loss. Implant insertion was defined as a baseline.

    Missing data was not imputed and not included in evaluation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant Survival Rate From the Time of Implant Insertion to Follow-up Visits (3,6,12,24,36 and 60 Months).

    Time frame: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months and 60 months

    An implant was reported to be a surviving implant when it remained in the jaw and was functionally loaded even if not all the individual success criteria were fulfilled (i) an implant that causes no allergic, toxic or gross infectious reactions either locally or systemically, ii) offered anchorage to a functional prosthesis, iii) showed no signs of fracture or bending, iv) showed no signs of peri-implant radiolucency on an intraoral radiograph using a paralleling technique strictly perpendicular to the implant-bone interface, and v) showed no mobility when individually tested by either tapping or rocking with a hand instrument).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Nobel Biocare

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of NobelBiocare SFB and CFB Implants

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Jul 19, 2011
Registry last updated
Apr 22, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.