Total knee replacement
DeviceRotating Platform (RP) Cruciate Retaining Knee System
Other names: P.F.C.® Sigma™ RP Cruciate Retaining Knee System
NCT Number: NCT00289094
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the rotating platform and fixed bearing implants in patients undergoing primary total knee replacement. Outcome scoring and radiographic assessment will be the methods used to evaluate performance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Billings, Montana, United States
This study will evaluate the clinical performance of rotating platform and fixed bearing knee implants. This will be done by obtaining a series of primary total knee replacements. Patients will receive either the P.F.C.® Sigma™ Rotating Platform Cruciate Retaining Knee System or the P.F.C.® Sigma™ Fixed Cruciate Retaining Knee System and assignment is randomized.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Rotating Platform (RP) Cruciate Retaining Knee System
Other names: P.F.C.® Sigma™ RP Cruciate Retaining Knee System
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter for at least 5 years.
The Knee Society Score (KSS) is comprised to two sections (each worth 100 points) for a maximum 200 points. One section is the Knee Society Clinical Score (KSCS) - points are given for pain, motion, and stability and points are deducted for flexion contracture, extension lag, and misalignment. The other section is the Knee Society Functional Score (KSFS) - points are assigned for walking distances and climbing stairs and points are deducted for use of walking aids. For each section, a score of 80-100 = excellent, 70-79 = good; 60-69 = fair; and < 60 = poor.
Time frame: On-going to end of study.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter for at least 5 years.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter for at least 5 years.
DePuy Orthopaedics
Industry
Multi-center, Prospective, Clinical Evaluation of the PFC Sigma Rotating Platform Cruciate Retaining Versus PFC Sigma Cruciate Retaining Knee Primary Cases
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00289107
Arthritis, Arthritis, Juvenile
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02347384
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Luoyang, Henan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00764530
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00872066
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Martin, Slovakia
View Trial Details