NCT Number: NCT00054717
Randomized Evaluation of Strategic Intervention in Multidrug Resistant Patients With Tipranavir (RESIST)
Demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Tipranavir/Ritonavir versus an active treatment regimen in highly treatment experienced Human Immunodeficiency virus 1(HIV-1) infected patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
1182.12.1401 St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients meeting the following criteria will be eligible for participation in th is study:
- Human Immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) infected males or females >=18 years of age.
- Screening genotypic resistance report indicating both of the following: at least one primary protease Inhibitor (PI) mutation at the following sites:
30N, 46I/L, 48V, 50V, 82A/F/L/T, 84V or 90M, and no more than two protease mutations on codons 33, 82, 84, or 90.
- At least 3 consecutive months experience taking antiretrovirals (ARVs) from each of the classes of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors(NRTI(s)), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors(NNRTI(s)), and protease inhibitors (PIs) at some point in treatment history,with at least 2 protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens, one of which must be the current regimen, and current protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral (ARV) medication regimen for at least 3 months prior to randomization.
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1) viral load >=1,000 copies/mL at screening.
Exclusion criteria
Patients with any of the following criteria are excluded from participation in t he study:
- Antiretroviral (ARV) medication naïve.
- Patients on recent drug holiday, defined as off antiretroviral (ARV) medications for at least 7 consecutive days within the last 3 months.
- alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >=3.0x upper limit of normal (ULN) and aspartate aminotransferase(AST) >=2.5x upper limit of normal (ULN) (>=Division of AIDS(DAIDS) Grade 1) at either screening visit.
Treatment and study plan
Ritonavir(r)
DrugComparator Protease Inhibitor (CPI)
DrugPrimary outcomes
-
Treatment Response at Week 48
Time frame: At week 48
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Time to Treatment Failure Through 48 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Week 48
Time to treatment failure is defined as 0 for patients who never achieve TR otherwise time to treatment failure is the earliest time of death, discontinuation of the study drug or introduction of a new anti-retroviral drug to the regimen if it is not solely related to either toxicity or intolerance clearly attributable to a background, or the first of two consecutive visits with VL measurements <1 log10 below baseline.
Secondary outcomes
-
Treatment Response at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 2
Time frame: week 2
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 4
Time frame: week 4
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 8
Time frame: week 8
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 16
Time frame: week 16
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 32
Time frame: Week 32
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 40
Time frame: Week 40
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 56
Time frame: week 56
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 64
Time frame: week 64
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 80
Time frame: Week 80
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 88
Time frame: Week 88
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Treatment Response at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Treatment response (TR) is defined as two consecutive VL ≥ 1 log10 below baseline without discontinuation of study drug, change in anti-retroviral background, or rebound
-
Time to Treatment Failure Through 96 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Week 96
time to treatment failure is defined as 0 for patients who never achieve TR otherwise time to treatment failure is the earliest time of death, discontinuation of the study drug or introduction of a new anti-retroviral drug to the regimen if it is not solely related to either toxicity or intolerance clearly attributable to a background, or the first of two consecutive visits with VL measurements <1 log10 below baseline.
-
Time to Confirmed Virologic Failure Through 48 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Week 48
Time to virologic failure is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the last measurement with a viral load reduction greater than 1.0 log before a confirmed drop of viral load reduction below 1.0 log.
-
Time to Confirmed Virologic Failure Through 96 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Week 96
Time to virologic failure is defined as the time from the start of treatment to the last measurement with a viral load reduction greater than 1.0 log before a confirmed drop of viral load reduction below 1.0 log.
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Viral Load Nadir, LOCF
Time frame: Week 2 through Week 96 (at any point during trial)
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 32
Time frame: Week 32
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 40
Time frame: Week 40
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 56
Time frame: Week 56
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Virologic Response (Viral Load >= 1 Log Drop) at Week 64
Time frame: Week 64
Percentage of participants with Viral Load (VL) >= 1 log reduction from baseline
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 2
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 4
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 8
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 32
Time frame: Baseline to Week 32
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 40
Time frame: Baseline to Week 40
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 48
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 56
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 64
Time frame: Baseline to Week 64
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 72
Time frame: Baseline to Week 72
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 80
Time frame: Baseline to Week 80
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 88
Time frame: Baseline to Week 88
-
Median Change From Baseline in Viral Load to Week 96
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 2 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 2
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 4
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 8 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 16 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 32 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 32
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 40 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 40
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 48 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 48
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 56 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 56
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 64 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 64
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 72 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 72
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 80 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 80
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 88 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 88
-
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 96 in CD4+ Cell Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 96
-
Time to New CDC Class C Progression Event or Death.
Time frame: after 48 weeks of treatment
Time to new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class C progression event (i.e., new AIDS defining illness) or death
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Viral Load Nadir, LOCF
Time frame: Week 2 through Week 96 (at any point during trial)
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 32
Time frame: week 32
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 40
Time frame: Week 40
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 56
Time frame: Week 56
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 64
Time frame: Week 64
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 80
Time frame: Week 80
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 88
Time frame: week 88
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 400 Copies/ml) at Week 96
Time frame: week 96
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 400 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Viral Load Nadir, LOCF
Time frame: Week 2 through Week 96 (at any point during trial)
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 2
Time frame: Week 2
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 4
Time frame: Week 4
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 32
Time frame: Week 32
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 40
Time frame: Week 40
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 48
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 56
Time frame: Week 56
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 64
Time frame: Week 64
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 80
Time frame: Week 80
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 88
Time frame: Week 88
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Virologic Response (VL < 50 Copies/ml) at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Percentage of participants with Viral Load < 50 copies/mL
-
Percentage of Patients With Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Grade 3 or 4 Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: 240 Weeks
NIH Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Table for Grading Severity of Adult Adverse Experiences, December 2004.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Randomized, Open-label, Comparative Safety and Efficacy Study of Tipranavir Boosted With Low-dose Ritonavir (TPV/RTV) Verses Genotypically-defined Protease Inhibitor/Ritonavir (PI/RTV) in Multiple Antiretroviral Drug-experienced Patients.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2003
- Primary completion
- 2008
- First posted
- Feb 10, 2003
- Registry last updated
- Jul 2, 2014
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Dolutegravir-Containing Versus Efavirenz-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens in HIV-1-Infected Pregnant Women and Their Infants
NCT03048422
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsA Prospective and Retrospective Observational Study of Multidrug-Resistant Patient Outcomes With and Without Ibalizumab
NCT05388474
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsSafety and Immunogenicity of Clade C ALVAC and gp120 HIV Vaccine
NCT03284710
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Maputo, Mozambique
View Trial DetailsSafety and Virologic Effect of a Human Monoclonal Antibody (VRC01) Administered Intravenously to Adults During Early Acute HIV Infection
NCT02591420
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Kericho, Kenya
View Trial Details