PRO 140
DrugPRO 140 is a humanized IgG4,κ monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the chemokine receptor CCR5.
Other names: PRO140, CCR5 antagonist, Humanized monoclonal antibody to CCR5
NCT Number: NCT02483078
This is a Phase 2b/3, multi-center, two part study, designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of PRO 140 in conjunction with existing ART (failing regimen) for one week and Optimized Background Therapy (OBT) for 24 weeks respectively. Study population includes treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients with CCR5-tropic virus who demonstrates evidence of HIV-1 replication despite ongoing antiretroviral therapy with documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes (or within two or more drug classes with limited treatment options).The options may be limited as a result of drug antiviral class cross-resistance or documented treatment intolerance.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
CD02 Investigational site, Ponce, PR, Puerto Rico
PRO 140, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, is indicated for treatment experienced adult HIV-1 patients infected with CCR5-tropic virus. These patients must demonstrate evidence of HIV-1 replication despite ongoing antiretroviral therapy and have documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to at least one ART drug within three drug classes (or within two or more drug classes with limited treatment option). The options may be limited as a result of drug antiviral class cross-resistance, documented treatment intolerance, documented objective assessments such as renal or hepatic insufficiency (e.g. high creatinine at baseline, limiting treatment options due to potential for toxicity), past adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity reactions or neuropsychiatric issues that could limit use of currently approved drugs.
Study population includes treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients with CCR5-tropic virus who demonstrates evidence of HIV-1 replication despite ongoing antiretroviral therapy with documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes (or within two drug classes with limited treatment option).
Enrollment will be stratified to have HIV-1 virus resistant to ART drugs within three drug classes or within two drug classes with limited treatment option.
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy, clinical safety and tolerability parameters of PRO 140 compared to placebo in reducing HIV-1 viral load during the 1-week double-blind treatment period. The secondary objectives of the trial are to assess the efficacy, clinical safety and tolerability parameters of PRO 140 in combination with Optimized Background Therapy during the 24-week single-arm, open-label treatment period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
OR
Treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients with documented genotypic or phenotypic resistance to at least one ART drug within two drug classes and have limited treatment options. The options may be limited as a result of drug antiretroviral class cross-resistance or documented treatment intolerance.
Note: Subjects diagnosed with either substance dependence or substance abuse or any history of a concomitant condition (e.g., medical, psychologic, or psychiatric) may be enrolled if in the opinion of site investigator these circumstances would not interfere with the subject's successful completion of the study requirements.
Exclusion criteria
PRO 140 is a humanized IgG4,κ monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the chemokine receptor CCR5.
Other names: PRO140, CCR5 antagonist, Humanized monoclonal antibody to CCR5
Optimized background therapy (OBT) is chosen on the basis of a subject's resistance test results and treatment history.
Other names: Optimized background therapy (OBT) is chosen on the basis of a subject's resistance test results and treatment history.
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
The primary efficacy endpoint will be proportion of participants with a 0.5 log10 or greater reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the one week double-blind treatment period (Part 1).
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Proportion of participants with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period, stratified to each group:
a. resistance to ART drugs within two drug class with limited treatment option (N = 24).
This outcome measures the proportion of participants that are classified as having a resistance to ART drugs within two drug classes and with limited treatment options with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period .
The total number of participants in the study ITT population, 52, is further stratified into two subgroups:
This measure includes only the 24 participants with Resistance to ART Drugs Within Two Drug Class With Limited Treatment Options
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
Proportion of participants with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period, stratified to each group:
a. Resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes (N = 28)
This outcome measures the proportion of participants that are classified as having a resistance to ART drugs within two drug classes and with limited treatment options with ≥ 0.5 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period .
The total number of participants in the study ITT population, 52, is further stratified into two subgroups as follows:
This measure includes only the 28 participants with resistance to ART drugs within three drug classes
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
The raw and change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA levels (log10 copies/mL) at the end of the 1-week double-blind treatment period was to be summarized by treatment group for the first week during the double-blind treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded. The change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA levels was to be compared between the two (2) groups using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with the stratification factor (i.e., Resistance to ART drugs at the time of randomization) included in the model.
Time frame: 25 weeks
The number and percentages of subjects achieving HIV-1 RNA < 400 copies/mL at Week 25, from the open label portion of the study, are presented
Time frame: 25 weeks
The number and percentages of subjects achieving HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 25 are presented. This is from the 24 week open label portion of the of the trial.
Time frame: 25 weeks
The raw and change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA levels (log10 copies/mL) at Week 25 was to be summarized for each week during the treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded.
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
The raw and change from baseline in CD4 cell count at the end of the 1-week double blind treatment period was to be summarized by treatment group for the first week during the double-blind treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded.
Time frame: 25 weeks
The raw and change from baseline in CD4 cell count at Week 25 was to be summarized for each week during the treatment phase. For change from baseline summaries, subjects with an undefined change from baseline, because of missing data, were to be excluded.
Time frame: From baseline visit to week 1 visit
The number and percentage of subjects with a ≥ 1log10 or greater reduction in HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline was to be presented for the two (2) treatment groups. The analysis of change in viral load was done for subjects with ≥ 1.0 log10 reduction in HIV-1 RNA after the first week of treatment. The analysis is presented for the ITT population
Time frame: 25 weeks
Assessments of subject-perceived injection site pain using the Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were performed during each visit to the clinic for a study visit.
Beginning at Treatment Visit 2 (T2), subjects were asked to mark the point that best represents the average pain intensity over the past week at the injection site on a horizontal line (100 mm in length) anchored by the following word descriptors at each end, "no pain" on the left side and "pain as bad as it could possibly be" on the right side of the line. The subject marks on the line or by pointing to a position on the line the point that they feel represents their perception of their pain state. The VAS score is determined by measuring in millimeters from the left-hand end of the line to the point that the patient marks
The scale range is 0mm to 100 mm, with 0 mm = No Pain and 100 mm = Pain as bad as it could possibly be.
In this measurement, a lower number corresponds to less perceived pain.
T# = Visit Week#
Time frame: 25 weeks
The investigator was to carefully evaluate the comments of each subject and the response to treatment in order to judge the true nature and severity of the AE. The question of the relationship of AEs to study drug should have been determined by the investigator after thorough consideration of all available facts. To assess severity, the investigator was to use the DAIDS AE grading table for adverse events as well as any injection site reactions.
Time frame: 25 weeks
The incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) by relationship to the study treatment. In total, there were 16 SAEs reported for eight (8) subjects (15.4%, 8/52). Thirteen of the SAEs were determined to be Unrelated, three were determined to be Unlikely Related to study treatment.
Time frame: 25 weeks
The number of study participants who had exclusive CCR5-tropic virus at study entry and subsequently developed Dual/Mixed (D/M)- and CXCR4-tropic virus at any time during study treatment while receiving PRO 140.
CytoDyn, Inc.
Industry
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial, Followed by Single-arm Treatment of PRO 140 in Combination With Optimized Background Therapy in Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Subjects
Acronym: PRO140
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06125509
HIV
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07225894
Behavior, HIV
Kisumu, Kisumu County, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT02447159
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Eket, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
View Trial DetailsNCT03734393
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details