University of Pittsburgh, Magee Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
NCT Number: NCT04391036
This is a double-blinded crossover study to evaluate whether Eudragit® content impacts the ability to self-insert placebo vaginal films. Thirty women will self-insert one high and and one low Eudragit® content film. The insertion order will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. After inserting each film, participants will complete a survey reporting their perceptions and experience. The primary endpoint is successful insertion defined as all of the film inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a study clinician. Secondary outcomes include preference for the low level or high level Eudragit® formulation film with respect to insertion and participants' description of identified challenges.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
This is a double-blinded crossover study to evaluate whether ammonio methacrylate copolymer dispersion type B (Eudragit®) content impacts the ability to self-insert placebo vaginal films. Eudragit® is a commonly used pharmaceutical excipient, present in several FDA approved products. This hydrophobic excipient is used in vaginal film formulations to increase disintegration time and impart extended drug release property. The presence of Eudragit and its concentration level affects film disintegration and spreadability in the vaginal environment, and are likely to affect tactile properties. Consequently, these attributes may impact ease of film administration, acceptability, and user preferences for specific film type.
Thirty pre-menopausal women, 18 - 45 years of age, will self-insert one high and and one low Eudragit® content film. High and low Eudragit films correspond to 12.8% and 6.4% of Eudragit® added during the formulation blending stage. The insertion order will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Within 10 minutes of the insertion, clinical staff will perform a speculum exam to assess the location of the film and remove the residual film. After inserting each film, participants will complete a survey reporting their perceptions and experience. The primary endpoint is successful insertion defined as all of the film inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a study clinician. Secondary outcomes include preference for the low level or high level Eudragit® formulation film with respect to insertion and participants' description of identified challenges.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
High (12.8%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film
Low (6.4%) Eudragit® Content Vaginal Film
Time frame: Approximately 30 minutes
Number of participants that successfully insert each vaginal film defined as the film location being completely inside the vagina upon visual assessment by a clinician
Time frame: Approximately 30 minutes
Participants that report that self-insertion of the placebo vaginal film was not difficult at all as assessed on a Likert scale from 1 (not difficult at all) to 4 (very difficult)
Time frame: Approximately 1 hour
Number of participants that report that they would prefer to use the high Eudragit® content vaginal film over the low Eudragit® content vaginal film. This outcome was analyzed by order of film product use (high then low vs low then high) as this may influence product preference.
Katherine Bunge
Other
A Randomized Double-Blind Cross-Over Study of Self-Insertion of Two Formulations of a Placebo Vaginal Film
Acronym: FAME103B
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06046053
Acceptability, Safety
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07660107
Safety, Tolerability
Boulder, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07604038
Dyssomnias, General Wellbeing
Boulder, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05173922
Alzheimer Disease, Behavior
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details