NCT Number: NCT02284945
Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Stabilisation Versus TPS
Spread of cancer to the spinal column is a growing problem in patients with cancer. It can cause a number of problems including pain, instability and neurologic problems. If left untreated, progressive weakness, numbness and bladder/bowel disturbance occurs. The aim of treatment is to help with pain and to reduce the risk of these neurological problems. This treatment has traditionally been radiotherapy to the spine. Surgery has always meant large open operations with a long recovery time and significant risk of complications. There has been new technology that has allowed less invasive operations to take place to stabilise the spine. The aim is to relieve the pressure on the spinal cord in addition to stabilising the spinal cord. These techniques are called 'minimally invasive' and include surgical techniques such as cement augmentation and percutaneous instrumentation.
The aim of this study is to compare traditional open operations with these new minimally invasive techniques to see if they do result in reduced complications and quicker recovery in addition to achieving the goals of surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Has an age ≥ 18 years
- Is suitable for radiotherapy
- Has been assessed by the oncologist
- Has symptoms of pain
- Is diagnosed with metastatic spinal pain from MRI findings with or without biopsy
- Technically possible to perform the surgery
- Is willing and able to comply with required followup questionnaires
- Is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study
- Understands and has signed the informed consent form.
- Life expectancy of > 3 months
Exclusion criteria
- Active systemic infection or infection localized to the site of implantation
- Allergy or sensitivity to Polyether ether ketone (PEEK), Titanium or Tantalum
- A bleeding disorder precluding from invasive surgery
- Rapid neurological deterioration requiring urgent surgery which would be delayed to the detriment of the patient by including in this study
Treatment and study plan
Keyhole surgery
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Visual analogue pain (VAS) scores
Time frame: 3 months
-
Visual analogue pain (VAS) scores
Time frame: 6 months
-
Visual analogue pain (VAS) scores
Time frame: 1 year
-
Visual analogue pain (VAS) scores
Time frame: 2 years
-
Oswestry disability score
Time frame: 3 months
-
Oswestry disability score
Time frame: 6 months
-
Oswestry disability score
Time frame: 1 year
-
Oswestry disability score
Time frame: 2 years
-
EuroQoL Questioonaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 3 months
-
EuroQoL Questioonaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 6 months
-
EuroQoL Questioonaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 1 year
-
EuroQoL Questioonaire (EQ-5D)
Time frame: 2 years
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Other
Registry information
Official study title
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Open Spinal Stabilisation and Percutaneous Solution (TPS) Surgery in Patients With Metastatic Spinal Disease.
Important dates
- Study start
- 2011
- Primary completion
- 2014
- Study completion
- 2014
- First posted
- Nov 6, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Nov 6, 2014
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Establishing a Descriptive Cohort of Patients Cared for Operation on the Spine
NCT02886260
Back Injuries, Bone Diseases
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsDexamethasone vs. Dexmedetomidine for ESPB in Pain Management After Spine Surgery
NCT06233617
Bone Diseases, Erector Spinae Plane Block
Poznan, Poznań, Poland
View Trial DetailsSafety and Efficacy in Pain Reduction of CT-Guided Screw Fixation for Post-laminectomy Surgery Segment Spinal Instability: A Monocentric Study of 24 Patients (2023-2026)
NCT07443267
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsUsing Radiation-free Ultrasound for Screening Scoliosis Among Female School Children in Hong Kong to Reduce Unnecessary X-ray Exposure
NCT06828068
Bone Diseases, Musculoskeletal Disease
Hong Kong
View Trial Details