Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03495635

Randomized Controlled Trial of Big Brothers Big Sisters Mentoring for Prevention of Crime and Delinquency

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Big Brothers Big Sisters of America (BBBSA) community-based mentoring (CBM) program for prevention of crime and delinquency/conduct problems, including risk and protective factors for these outcomes. Approximately 2,500 youth ages 10-16 will be randomly assigned to either the CBM program or an untreated control group. Study outcomes will be assessed over a 4-year period via both youth- and parent-report surveys and official records of police/court contact (e.g., arrests).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

10 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, 60608, United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Big Brothers Big Sisters of America (BBBSA) community-based mentoring (CBM) program for prevention of crime and delinquency/conduct problems, including risk and protective factors for these outcomes. Participants will be recruited from 16 BBBSA affiliates, which are located in different regions of the U.S. and were invited to serve as sites for the study using a random selection process. The study sample will consist of approximately 2,500 youth ages 10-16 whose parents seek services from one of the participating BBBSA affiliates during the study enrollment period and for whom consent/assent to participate in the research is obtained. Enrolled youth will be randomly assigned to participate in the CBM program (treatment group) or to a control group (no BBBSA programming during the youth's 4-year period of study participation). Youth will be assigned in a 3:1 ratio to the treatment and control groups. Youth and parents will complete survey measures both at study enrollment, prior to notification of assignment to control or treatment group, and 18 months later. Official records of police/court contact (e.g., arrests), with separate parent/guardian consent as provided at study enrollment, will be obtained both for the period preceding each youth's enrollment in the study and for a 4-year period following enrollment.

The study has 4 specific aims:

  • To determine the effects of participation in the Big Brothers Big Sisters CBM program on youth offending as measured by police/court records, i.e., person offense, property offense, drug law violation, public order offense, or status offense.
  • To determine the effects of participation in the BBBS CBM program on the likelihood of youths' involvement in delinquent behavior/conduct problems as assessed by youth and parent reports.
  • To determine the effects of BBBS CBM program participation on the likelihood of youths' involvement in substance use as assessed by self-reports of alcohol use to point of drunkenness, tobacco, or illicit drug use.
  • To determine the effects of BBBS CBM program participation on both risk and protective factors for delinquent/criminal behavior, such as aggression, depressive symptoms, association with deviant peers, self-control, and school connectedness, as assessed by youth and/or parent reports, and to explore the role of these effects in mediating effects of program participation on offending, delinquent behavior, and substance use.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • youth is 10 years of age or older
  • youth is likely to be eligible for the Big Brothers Big Sisters Community-Based Mentoring program as determined by initial assessment of program staff

Exclusion criteria

  • youth has a severe learning, cognitive or other intellectual disability as reported by the parent
  • parent does not both speak and read either English or Spanish
  • youth does not have a sibling who is already a study participant
  • youth has been matched with a Big Brother/Sister through one of the affiliate's programs in the past
  • youth has a sibling currently receiving services from the affiliate for whom services were initiated (i.e., inquiry was made) prior to start of the study
  • youth belongs to a group that the affiliate is excluding from study participation based on previous agreement with the research team
  • youth is designated as an exception case by affiliate staff (each affiliate will have the opportunity to exclude up to 4% of study-eligible youth from the research prior to consent and random assignment for any reason deemed appropriate (e.g., perceived high need of the youth))

Treatment and study plan

Big Brothers Big Sisters Community-Based Mentoring Program

Behavioral

One-to-one mentoring provided by an adult volunteer with training and ongoing monitoring and support from program staff.

Primary outcomes

  1. Arrest

    Time frame: 4 years

    0/1 indicator based on official police/court/juvenile office records of any of the following types of offenses-person offense, property offense, drug law violation, public order offense, or status offense

  2. Arrest

    Time frame: 18 months

    0/1 indicator based on official police/court/juvenile office records of any of the following types of offenses-person offense, property offense, drug law violation, public order offense, or status offense

  3. Delinquency

    Time frame: 18 months

    0/1 indicator based on youth and parent report using 13 items from the Add Health Study (Bearman et al., 1997)

  4. Substance use

    Time frame: 18 months

    0/1 indicator based on youth report of alcohol use to point of drunkenness, tobacco, or illicit drug use

Secondary outcomes

  1. Truancy

    Time frame: 18 months

    3-item youth-report measure (2 items from Herrera et al., 2013)

  2. Association with deviant peers

    Time frame: 18 months

    A single measure computed as the average of scores on continuous youth-report measure (Elliott et al., 1996) and one-item (0/1) parent-report indicator from Youth Risk Index (Herrera et al., 2013) after each score has been standardized to mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1.

  3. School suspensions

    Time frame: 18 months

    One-item (0/1) parent-report indicator from Youth Risk Index (Herrera et al., 2013)

  4. Depressive symptoms

    Time frame: 18 months

    Depressive Symptoms Pediatric Self-Report - Short Form from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (Irwin et al., 2010). Lower scores indicate a better outcome

  5. Impulsivity

    Time frame: 18 months

    A single measure computed as the average of scores on continuous youth- and parent-report scales (Hay & Meldrum, 2010) after each score has been standardized to mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1.

  6. Conventional values

    Time frame: 18 months

    Belief in the Moral Order scale of the Communities That Care Youth Survey (Arthur et al., 2002)

  7. Aggressive behavior

    Time frame: 18 months

    A single measure computed as the average of scores on youth-report Aggression Scale (Orpinas & Frankowski, 2001) and parent-report Parent's Checklist from the Fast Track Project: https://fasttrackproject.org/techrept/p/pcl/ after each score has been standardized to mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1.

  8. Academic success

    Time frame: 18 months

    4-item measure of grades in core subjects (Herrera et al., 2013)

  9. Positive parenting

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report Positive Parenting subscale from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Essau et al., 2006)

  10. Parent involvement

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report Involvement subscale from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Essau et al., 2006)

  11. Parental monitoring and supervision

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report Poor Monitoring/Supervision subscale from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Essau et al., 2006)

  12. Parental consistent discipline

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report Inconsistent Discipline subscale from the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (Essau et al., 2006)

  13. Family relationships

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report General Functioning scale of the Family Assessment Device (Epstein et al., 1983)

  14. Perceived social support from family members

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al., 1988): Family Members subscale

  15. Perceived social support from peers

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al., 1988): Peers subscale

  16. Perceived social support from special person

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (Zimet et al., 1988): Significant Others subscale

  17. School engagement

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Behavioral Engagement subscale of the Engagement versus Disaffection with Learning Scale (Skinner et al., 2009)

  18. Goal-setting and pursuit

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report Goal Orientation scale from Child Trends: https://www.childtrends.org/research/research-by-topic/positive-indicators-project/goal-orientation/

  19. Involvement in out-of-school-time activities

    Time frame: 18 months

    Parent-report (Herrera et al., 2007)

  20. Volunteering in the community

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report single-item (Herrera et al., 2013)

  21. Life satisfaction

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report single-item measure from WHO's 2005-06 Health Behaviors in School Age Children Survey: http://filer.uib.no/psyfa/HEMIL-senteret/HBSC/2006_Mandatory_Questionnaire.pdf

  22. Self-esteem

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Global Self-Esteem subscale of brief version of the Self-Esteem Questionnaire (DuBois et al., 1996; Silverthorn et al., 2017)

  23. Happiness

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Positive Affect Pediatric Self-Report - Short Form from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (Forrest et al., 2017)

  24. Grit

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report Grit Scale for Children (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009)

  25. Social competence

    Time frame: 18 months

    Social Competencies Scale of the Youth Outcome Measures Online Toolbox (Muris, 2001)

  26. Special interest development

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report (adapted from DuBois & Keller, 2017)

  27. Hopeful future expectations

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report abbreviated version of the Hopeful Future Expectations Scale (Bowers et al., 2012)

  28. Career exploration

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report 2 items (adapted from Herrera et al., 2011)

  29. College exploration

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report 1 item (adapted from Herrera et al., 2011)

  30. Self-advocacy

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report (Jarjoura et al., 2017)

  31. Coping efficacy

    Time frame: 18 months

    Youth-report 1 item adapted from Coping Efficacy Scale (Sandler et al., 2000)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Illinois at Chicago

Other

Collaborators

  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America
  • Herrera Consulting Group, LLC
  • Laura and John Arnold Foundation
  • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Community-Based Mentoring Program for Prevention of Crime and Juvenile Delinquency

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Apr 12, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 22, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.