Completed
NCT Number: NCT00466648
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
This study wishes to compare patient satisfaction and cosmesis of two different closure methods of laparoscopic ports. One method uses tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with a deep sub-cutaneous stitch and a Band-Aid dressing. The comparison method uses a 3.o undyed vicryl transcutaneous stitch, with a Bacitracin and Tegaderm dressing.
Completed
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
16 year–70 year
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- gynecologic laparoscopy patients
Exclusion criteria
- known sensitivity to tissue adhesive, antibiotic ointment
Treatment and study plan
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
New York Presbyterian Hospital
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Methods of Laparoscopy Port Closure
Important dates
- Study start
- 2007
- Study completion
- 2007
- First posted
- Apr 27, 2007
- Registry last updated
- Apr 27, 2007
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.