Department of cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital in Skejby
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT02637843
Coronary angiography (CAG) and possible angioplasty (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention = PCI) can be performed by access from the groin (a. femoralis), the wrist (a. radialis) or the elbow (a. brachialis). It is well established that there is less risk of bleeding complications when using a radial access. The smaller diameters of the vessels in the forearm, however, may result in increased risk of pain during CAG/PCI via a. radialis. This is associated with vascular spasm (spasm tendency). Ultimately this means that one may have to convert to access via a. femoralis.
To perform a CAG/PCI, a tube (a so-called sheath) has to be inserted in a. radialis. It is unclear whether the design of the sheaths can reduce the spasm tendency, thus reducing pain. Terumo has recently introduced a new kind of sheath, so-called Terumo Glide Slender Heath Coated (hereafter referred to as "Slender sheath"). This sheath is partly coated, partly made of a thinner material. "Slender sheath" thus has an outer diameter smaller than that of the sheath from traditional use (Terumo Radio Focus sheath, hereafter referred to as "Standard sheath"), although the inner diameter (lumen) is the same in the two sheaths. In turn, the "Slender sheath" is more fragile and far more expensive.
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate whether use of slender sheath compared with standard sheath is Associated with less pain and fewer complications following CAG/PCI.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
Study design: Randomized study
Purposes: to investigate whether the use of "Slender sheath" is associated with less pain compared to use of "Standard Sheath" and less complications corresponding at the access site. Specific hypotheses:
Time Schedule The trial will run from December 2015 until a total number of 1000 patients are included. It is expected that the data collection and publication of the results will be completed within a year.
Endpoints
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparing outcomes for two different sheaths used during radial CAG/PCI
Time frame: 1-2 minutes during sheath insertion
Maximal pain (Visual analogue scale) during sheath insertion
Time frame: 10 minutes to 2 hours (during CAG/PCI)
Maximal pain (Visual analogue scale) during CAG/PCI
Time frame: 10 minutes to 2 hours (during CAG/PCI)
Proportion of patients where the operator has to change to femoral access to complete the CAG/PCI
Time frame: 10 minutes to 2 hours (during CAG/PCI)
cumulative amount of analgesics, sedatives and verapamil during the procedure
Time frame: Within one month of CAG/PCI
Ultrasound and reverse Barbaeu test is performed to test patency of a.radialis following CAG/PCI. If patency not documented at time of discharge the tests are repeated at one month. The artery is patent if normal Barbaue test and ultrasound without occlusion.
Time frame: 10 minutes to 2 hours (during CAG/PCI)
cumulative number of catheters used during the procedure
Time frame: 10 minutes to 2 hours (during CAG/PCI)
cumulative number of sheaths used during the procedure
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Other
Randomized Comparison of Coated Slender Versus Un-coated Traditional Sheath
Acronym: ACCESS-I
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.