Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
Boulder, Colorado, 80303, United States
NCT Number: NCT04773639
Adults diagnosed with metastatic cancer commonly experience depression and anxiety symptoms, which can interfere with advance care planning. This randomized clinical trial evaluates a novel, piloted, primary palliative care intervention that addresses advance care planning and psychosocial needs of patients with metastatic cancer. The intervention focuses on patients with elevated anxiety and depression (anx/dep) symptoms-those with highest psychosocial needs who may be at greatest risk for advance care planning non-completion. The intervention is founded on an evidence-based intervention approach known as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) that reduces distress and promotes behavior change through theory-driven mechanisms. In the proposed randomized trial, M-ACT will be compared to a usual care control condition. The study will also assess the association between advance care planning and anx/dep symptoms, thereby informing the critical practice question of whether anx/dep symptoms should be addressed concurrently with advance care planning. The study will enroll patients with Stage IV solid tumor cancer (N=240) within Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, randomized 1:1 to M-ACT or usual care. The study aims to: 1) Evaluate the hypothesis that M-ACT will increase advance care planning completion (primary outcome) and sense of life meaning, and reduce anx/dep symptoms and fear of dying relative to usual care control. 2) Assess the association between anx/dep symptoms and advance care planning at baseline and over time, testing the hypothesis that decreases in anx/dep symptoms at post- intervention will be associated with increases in advance care planning at follow-up. 3) Assess M-ACT's hypothesized mechanisms to specify how the intervention works (exploratory aim). Given their advance care planning and psychosocial needs, and poor access to palliative care, rigorously investigating M-ACT has the potential to benefit community patients with metastatic cancer and to advance palliative care science by addressing gaps in novel approaches, foundational knowledge, and the scalable delivery of palliative care.
Note: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the in-person group component of M-ACT has currently been shifted to an online group format.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boulder, Colorado, 80303, United States
This study will evaluate an innovative, multi-modal palliative care intervention that addresses the lack of advance care planning (ACP) and unmet psychosocial needs commonly experienced by patients with metastatic cancer. Up to half of adults with metastatic cancer report elevated anxiety or depression symptoms, which can cause withdrawal from daily activities and future planning and have been linked to non-adherent health behaviors in other disease populations. However, little is known about the extent to which anxiety or depression influence ACP completion in palliative care. In addition, metastatic cancer triggers patients' fear of dying and threatens their sense of meaning. The current approach aims to optimize two core palliative care outcomes - ACP and psychosocial well being - in outpatient oncology settings and to build the evidence base for primary palliative care interventions. This new multimodal intervention, which is based on extensive pilot data, uses a primary palliative care approach and focuses on patients with elevated anxiety or depression (anx/dep) symptoms.
The intervention is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), an evidence-based approach to reduce distress and promote behavior change through theorized mechanisms that include cultivating acceptance of internal experience and aligning behavior with personal values. A pilot study for adults with metastatic cancer and elevated anx/dep symptoms conducted by the current research team, leveraged ACT to design and refine the multi-modal ACT intervention (M-ACT) in response to patient and provider feedback. M-ACT helps metastatic cancer patients to live meaningfully and face the future no matter what their health status, supports their engagement in ACP and addresses their psychosocial needs.
To facilitate future scalability, M-ACT uses a novel multi-modal delivery structure comprising both in-person group sessions led by existing on-site clinical social workers and self-paced, personalized online sessions completed at home, which efficiently increase intervention dose without increasing patient travel or provider demands. The current randomized controlled trial will rigorously evaluate the ability of M-ACT to increase ACP (primary outcome) and improve psychosocial outcomes (secondary). This study also will evaluate the relationship between anx/dep symptoms and ACP to inform the critical clinical question of whether anx/dep symptoms should be addressed concurrently with ACP. Finally, the study will explore mechanisms that may explain how M-ACT influences ACP and the targeted secondary outcomes.
The study will enroll patients with stage IV solid tumor cancer (N = 240), randomized in a 1:1 ratio to M-ACT or usual care for a 4-week intervention period. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (to assess mechanisms), 1-week post-intervention, and 2-month follow-up.
Note: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the in-person group component of M-ACT has currently been shifted to an online group format.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
An innovative muli-modal palliative care intervention that addresses the lack of advance care planning and unmet psychosocial needs commonly experienced by patients with metastatic cancer.
The control condition includes usual care (UC) at the collaborating clinics, consisting of access to a clinical social worker and nurse practitioners for advance care planning and supportive visits at patient request.
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
The primary outcome is defined as change in the number of steps taken toward ACP completion from baseline through 2-month follow-up. ACP steps will be assessed with a checklist adapted from the M-ACT pilot study by consulting the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association online ACP resources and the study team, and refined by soliciting pilot participants' feedback on item clarity. The checklist describes each ACP step and asks patients to indicate steps taken to date.
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported depression symptom questionnaire. Higher scores = more depression symptoms
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported anxiety symptom questionnaire. Higher scores = more anxiety symptoms
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported fear of death and dying questionnaire. Higher scores = greater fear of death and dying
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported sense of life meaning and peace. Higher scores = greater sense of meaning/peace
Time frame: At the end of each session during the 5-week intervention period, plus after the booster session 1 month later
Participant value of the session will be assessed through the Session Feedback. Higher scores = higher value and acceptability of the session
Time frame: From the start to end of the 5-week intervention plus the booster session held 1 month later
Intervention engagement will be assessed via attendance in group sessions and completion of the online modules and check-ins
Time frame: Assessed two times: within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Participant satisfaction will be measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (adapted to the current intervention) with higher scores indicating more satisfaction
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported experiential avoidance with higher scores indicating greater avoidance.
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported defusion/decentering with higher scores indicating greater defusion/decentering.
Time frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported values-aligned behavior with higher scores indicating more aligned behavior
University of Colorado, Boulder
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06920238
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05280691
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06484400
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06910748
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Hong Kong, China
View Trial Details