Mohan Ramchandani
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India
NCT Number: NCT03186248
Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of a short esophageal myotomy extending from 3 cm cephalad to the EGJ, to 3 cm distal to it with a long esophageal myotomy with an additional proximal extension (at least 6 cm cephalad to the EGJ, to 3 cm distal) for POEM procedures. Principle of POEM is to reduce pressure gradient across LES by Myotomy. Hypothesis is that performing short myotomy will result in similar efficacy in achalasia cardia while reducing the total time taken for the procedure and ultimately will result in less complications.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082, India
The primary goal of treatment of achalasia cardia (either LHM or POEM) is to divide the muscle at LES to reduce the pressure so that food bolus can pass down into the esophagus. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal length of this myotomy for either procedure. During LHM the proximal length of myotomy is extended upto 6-8 cm in esophagus and distally to 3 cm in stomach. There are no data on long term outcomes between differential proximal myotomy lengths. The conventionally the esophageal myotomy is extended to 6-8 cm, this is based on technical considerations, as it is the maximum length that can safely be achieved via a laparoscopic, transhiatal approach. High pressure zone of Esophago gastric junction (EGJ) complex extends for 4 cm on an average with 2 cm on esophageal side. It is hypothesized that If shorter proximal myotomy that ablates just the EGJ complex could achieve the same normalization of EGJ physiology as a longer one, there could be several advantages to this modification. It will take less mediastinal dissection of the esophagus, potentially reducing the chances of esophageal perforation, vagal injury and pleural tears. During POEM, a shorter myotomy would allow for creation of a shorter submucosal tunnel, decreasing operative time along with potentially decreasing the incidence of mucosal perforations, pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, there is chance that many patients regain some esophageal peristalsis after both LHM and POEM. Patients undergoing POEM for type 1 and type 2 Achalasia cardia will be randomised into 2 groups of short oesophageal (3 cm) and long oesophageal ( 6-8 cm) myotomy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
General anesthesia will be administered and an esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be performed. Mucosal incision proximal to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) will be identified depending on short or long myotomy. A 1.5- to 2-cm mucosal incision will be performed after raising a submucosal wheal. The endoscope will be inserted to create a submucosal tunnel with a combination of blunt dissection, carbon dioxide insufflation, hydro dissection and careful electrocautery. The tunnel will be extended past the GEJ, 3 cm onto the gastric cardia. after myotomy, the mucosal incision will then be closed using standard endoscopic clips.
Time frame: 1 year
Clinical success defined as Eckardt score≤3 compared between the two groups
Time frame: Intra-opeartive
Operating time defined as time taken from mucosal incision to closure of incision after completion of the procedure. Procedure duration was calculated in both the groups and compared
Time frame: At the time of index procedure
Adverse events encountered during the procedure will be noted. Clinical success with reference to improvement in eckerd score. Change in LES pressure by Manometry ( Assessed at 1and 3 months) Assessment of Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) by Potential of Hydrogen (pH) -impedance and Endoscopy (Assessed at 1 and 3 months) Change in barium column height on timed barium Esophagogram (Assessed at pre procedure at 1 and 3 months).
Time frame: 1 and 3 months
In both the arms reduction in mean LES pressure will be compared at 1 and 3 months
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months
In both the groups Eckardt score ( based on symptoms of Dysphagia, Chest pain, regurgitation and weight loss) will be compared
Time frame: 3 months
Both the groups will under go clinical evaluation, esophagograstroscopy and ph metry
Time frame: 1 and 3 months
In both the groups time barium swallow studies will be done to evaluate the oesophageal emptying at 5 minutes.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Other
Comparison of Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in Cases With Idiopathic Achalasia: A Randomized Single Blinded Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07451301
Achalasia Cardia, Deglutition Disorders
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07177222
Achalasia Cardia, Deglutition Disorders
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
View Trial DetailsNCT05729971
Achalasia, Achalasia Cardia
Naples, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT04951739
Achalasia Cardia, Deglutition Disorders
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
View Trial Details