UPMC Hillman Cancer Center - Radiation Oncology
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Brieana Marino, MS
CONTACT
Christopher T Wilke, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Samantha Demko, RN
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT02128906
The goal of this clinical research study is to learn which chemotherapy combination may be more effective in treating locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The side effects of these combinations will also be studied.
This study treatment consists of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy. For study chemotherapy, patients will be randomized between cisplatin or the combination of docetaxel and cetuximab. Subjects will be stratified depending on HPV status and the presence of ERCC-1 [4F9] in the tumor prior to randomization. The study will evaluate cisplatin vs. docetaxel-cetuximab in the overall population, and test which radiation and chemotherapy combination works best in relationship to how much ERCC-1 [4F9] is expressed in a tumor.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Brieana Marino, MS
CONTACT
Christopher T Wilke, MD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Samantha Demko, RN
CONTACT
If randomized to the cisplatin arm, patients receive cisplatin, 40 mg/m2, administered intravenously (IV) once a week (+/- 2 days) for 7 weeks. Per investigator discretion, if radiation continues beyond 7 weeks due to technical factors (not toxicity delays), an 8th dose of concurrent cisplatin may be added.
Cisplatin can be given either before or after the radiation therapy fraction that is given on the same day. If a dose of cisplatin is omitted when radiotherapy is ongoing, it will not be made up or added to the end of treatment. The omitted dose and the reason for the omission should be recorded in the site's source documentation. If radiotherapy is held, cisplatin should be held during the treatment break and resumed when radiation restarts.
Patients randomized to Cetuximab arm receive cetuximab, 250 mg/m2, IV over 60 minutes on a weekly schedule (+/- 2 days). . Cetuximab may be administered either before or after the radiation fraction that is given on the same day. Docetaxel will be administered at least 30 minutes following cetuximab. It is not permitted to make up missed doses of cetuximab or docetaxel. If a radiation therapy treatment break occurs, cetuximab should be held. When radiation restarts, cetuximab should resume.
Cetuximab will be given once a week (+/- 2 days) for a total of 7 doses concurrent with radiation therapy and docetaxel.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Calculated Creatinine Clearance = [(140-age) X (actual body weight in kg) X (0.85 if female)]/(72 X serum creatinine)
Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly x 7
Other names: Platinol
IMRT: once daily, M-F, 7 weeks (70 Gy)
Docetaxel 15 mg/m2 weekly x 7
Other names: Taxotere
Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 load, one week prior to IMRT Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly x 7
Other names: Erbitux
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time To Progression is the duration of time from date of study entry until the first appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with increased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Time To Progression is the duration of time from date of study entry until the appearance of new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with decreased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Proportions of patients with a tumor volume equal to or less than the tumor volume at start of radiotherapy.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Proportion of patients with new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with increased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Validation candidate cutpoint for decreased/normal vs. increased ERCC1 [4F9] expression in patients treated with cisplatin-IMRT. ERCC1 [4F9] expression is measured.
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Proportion of patients that experience response to treatment per RECIST v1.1 Per RECIST v1.1: Complete Response(CR): Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target)must have reduction in short axis to <10mm. Partial Response(PR): Atleasta30%decreaseinthesumof diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: At 2 years
Proportion of patients with new metastatic lesions or objective tumor progression in patients with increased tumoral ERCC1 expression. Progression is defined per RECIST v1.1 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression).
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The FACT-H&N (version 4) consists of a cancer-specific questionnaire, FACT-G, in addition to 12 H&N cancer-specific items (the HN subscale). FACT-G is a 27-item measure that assesses general cancer quality of life. The FACT-G contains 4 subscales: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. Individuals are asked to indicate how true 27 statements are for them, using the past 7 days as the timeframe. Responses range from not at all (0), to very much (4) on a 5-point scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The FACT-Cog consists of 37 questions exploring four different subscales of the cognitive function: perceived cognitive impairments (CogPCI: 20 items); perceived cognitive abilities (CogPCA: 9 items); comments from others (CogOth: 4 items); and the impact of perceived cognitive impairments on quality of life (CogQOL: 4 items). The patient must answer the questions by referring to the last seven days, expressing how many times a given situation has occurred during this period.The total FACT-Cog score is the sum of the four subscales and ranges from 0-148. The higher the total score, the better the cognitive function, and the lower the impact on patients' quality of life.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The PHQ-9 is a 9-question, self-administered instrument used to screen for the presence and severity of depression. Patients score how frequently they have been bothered by symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Scores range from 0-27 with 0 being least depressed and 27 most depressed. Scores are also monitored for change in values from visit to visit. Any value above 5 is an indication of the necessity of treatment intervention.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
GAD-7 is a self-administered questionnaire of seven items which measures the frequency of GAD symptoms. Patients are monitored for change in values from visit to visit.Scores range from 0-21; severity of anxiety increases in each escalation of 5 points. Higher scores indicate increased severity of depression.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
MESAS asks cancer patients or caregivers to score 9 common cancer symptoms (along with a 10th symptom of "other") on a scale of 0-10. The scores are transferred to a ESAS Graph, thereby allowing the practitioner to identify severity of each symptom at time of assessment. Each symptom is rated from 0-10 on a numerical scale with 0 indicating an absence of the symptom and 10 indicating the worst possible severity of the symptom.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
A self-administered, 7-item test used to evaluate the level of distress caused in patients by a traumatic event. The patient is asked to consider their experience with cancer during the past week and then rate how much they were bothered by the experience, from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). This yields a score between 0 and 28. Higher scores indicate a greater intrusion or impact of distress in the patient's life due to cancer.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
A self-administered 2-item quiz used to evaluate the level of blame patients are experiencing regarding their cancer. Asked to consider the extent to which they contributed to contracting cancer on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (completely), patients answer the questions to generate a number between 2 and 10. The lower the number, the less self-incrimination the patient is enduring.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
PTS is used to measure the patient's belief regarding the level of threat cancer poses to his/her life. Three questions are asked and the patient answers on a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (extremely). A final score between 3 and 15 is generated; the higher the number, the more threatened the subject is by the cancer diagnosis.
Time frame: Up to 2 years
The Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form is a 9 item self-administered questionnaire to measure the severity of a person' pain in musculoskeletal conditions and its impact on the patient's daily function. Patients are to consider their pain over the past 24 hours and rate it on a 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain) scale for each of the following points: its most severe, its least sever, its average and its appearance right now. Patients are also to provide a score between 0 (no relief) and 10 (complete relief) regarding the effectiveness of treatments or medicines in the past 24 hours. Finally, patients rate the amount of interference pain has in 7 basic life functions on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being "no effect" and 10 being "complete interference".
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Brieana Marino, MS
CONTACT
Samantha Demko, RN
CONTACT
Christopher Wilke
Other
A Randomized, Phase II Study of Definitive Radiotherapy With Concurrent Cisplatin vs. Docetaxel-cetuximab in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: an ERCC1 Biomarker Enrichment and Interaction Design
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02586207
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03854032
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00101582
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
View Trial DetailsNCT01089803
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details