Cancer hospital, CAMS
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021, China
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Wen-Yang Liu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wen-Yang Liu, MD
CONTACT
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06084897
The treatment efficacy for stage IVb esophageal cancer has been improved through chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy recently.
On this basis, the investigators intend to conduct a prospective, multicenter phase II clinical trial to assess whether radiotherapy could further improve the survival of patients with metastatic esophageal cancer responding to PD-1 Inhibitor plus chemotherapy.
Accompanied tissue samples, blood samples and urine samples will be analyzed by molecular biological detection (Including Whole Exome Sequencing and proteomics) to explore potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes, efficacy and toxicity.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021, China
Location status: Recruiting
Wen-Yang Liu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wen-Yang Liu, MD
CONTACT
CONTACT
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common carcinomas with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. More than 30% of the patients were stage IV when diagnosed. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EC for approximately four decades, however, only minimal improvement has been reached in overall survival (OS).
Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown effective antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, advanced or metastatic EC. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the PD-1 inhibitor could further improve the OS in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) on the basis of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has become one of the the standard treatment modality for metastatic EC.
As reported, for the patients with metastatic lung cancer or EC, locoregional radiotherapy could improve survival, especially in those who responding to systemic therapy. However, high-level evidence is still needed to assess whether these patients can benefit from local radiotherapy.
The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is obviously better than that of chemotherapy alone. On this basis, locoregional radiotherapy may help those patients with metastatic EC responding to systemic therapy improve local control, relieve the local symptoms, and even improve survival.
Therefore, the investigators intend to conduct a prospective, multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficiency and safety of radiotherapy with chemotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with metastatic EC. Accompanied tissue samples, blood samples and urine samples will be analyzed by molecular biological detection to explore potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes, efficacy and toxicity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A maximum of six cycles was recommended for chemotherapy.
Other names: Chemotherapy
Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab or Tislelizumab or Serplulimab or Toripalimab or Sintilimab or Camrelizumab
Other names: Immunotherapy
IMRT/VMAT technique. Patients receive radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for an average of 5 weeks. Radiotherapy is delivered to achieve a dosage of 49.22Gy/23f or 50Gy/25f to PGTV for lymphnode metastasis only patients and 40.66Gy/19f or 40Gy/20f for organ metastasis patients. Radiation treatment is planned after chemotherapy completed.
Other names: Planned Radiotherapy
IMRT/VMAT technique. Patients receive radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for an average of 5 weeks. Radiotherapy is delivered to achieve a dosage of 49.22Gy/23f or 50Gy/25f to PGTV for lymphnode metastasis only patients and 40.66~49.22Gy/19f ~23f or 40~50Gy/20~25f for organ metastasis patients. Radiation treatment is planned after disease progression when recommended by multidisciplinary team.
Other names: Radiotherapy when needed
Time frame: 12 month
Overall survival was defined as the time from first dose to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS is reported for all participants of the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculated the 1-year survival probability.
Time frame: 12 month
Median progression-free survival (PFS), was defined as the time from first dose to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
Time frame: One month within the end of one specific treatment
Acute toxicity Rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises within one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
Time frame: One month after the end of one specific treatment.
Late toxicity rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises after one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
Time frame: 24 month
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
Time frame: 24 month
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oesophageal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
Time frame: 24 month
To explore the dynamic changes of circulating tumor DNA (the frequency of specific mutations by Next-generation sequencing Methodology) from baseline, before and after radiotherapy.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Other
Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy: a Patient Preference Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06128551
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00242723
Adenoma, Cancers of Non Thoracic Origin With Metastases to the Lungs or Pleura
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06906887
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06465069
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Solid Tumor
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details