Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07195305

Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation or Uterine Artery Embolization for Treatment of Adenomyosis-related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

The present study aims to compare the efficacy (menstrual blood loss, pain, quality of life) and the safety (complications, recovery) of each conservative intervention (RFA, UAE) versus hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-related abnormal uterine bleeding, up to 2 years

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

30 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Adenomyosis is defined by the presence of ectopic non-atypical endometrial glands and stroma within the smooth muscle fibers of the myometrium causing reactive hypertrophy of the uterus. The prevalence of adenomyosis is approximately 20% before 40 years, and probably higher in the following decade. One-third of women with adenomyosis are symptomatic. Symptoms include abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) (40-50%), pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea 15-30%, dyspareunia) and are related to the uniformly enlarged and globular uterus (distension, swelling). Adenomyosis can be diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasonography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Symptoms associated with adenomyosis can be treated by hormonal or non-hormonal medications. When medical treatment fails, a hysterectomy is proposed to women who do not consider childbearing. For women who wish to preserve their uterus, two alternatives are possible.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is intended to ablate the endometrial lining of the uterus on pre-menopausal women with AUB due to benign causes for whom childbearing is complete. This outpatient procedure is well tolerated, with 10% of post-operative adverse events within one year, mainly not serious like pelvic pain/cramping and vaginal discharge/infection.

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is as a minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic uterine fibroids since 1995. This procedure is also well tolerated, with efficacy and satisfaction rates of 85% at 2 years, performed usually as a day case or with a short hospital stay of 12-24h to manage immediate post-operative pain.

Therefore the extension of the indications of both techniques in AUB associated with adenomyosis should be questioned.

The present study aims to compare the efficacy (menstrual blood loss, pain, quality of life) and the safety (complications, recovery) of each conservative intervention (RFA, UAE) versus hysterectomy for the treatment of adenomyosis-related abnormal uterine bleeding, up to 2 years

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Premenopausal women aged 30 to 50 years
  • Women who had at least 3 prior months failed medical therapy, or a contraindication to medical therapy, or refused medical therapy for adenomyosis-related AUB
  • Symptomatic pure internal adenomyosis or dominant adenomyosis (with less than 5 concurrent uterine fibroids type 3-7 < 5 cm) confirmed by MRI (< 6 months) according to ESHRE criteria
  • AUB defined as a PBAC score >100 at baseline
  • Uterine ultrasound measurement of 6.0-12.0 cm (external os to internal fundus)
  • Women with an indication for hysterectomy for adenomyosis-related AUB and accepting hysterectomy
  • Highly effective contraception for women of childbearing potential, maintained until the onset of menopause
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of health insurance
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Uterine cavity abnormality or obstruction confirmed via imaging modalities or hysteroscopy
  • Deep infiltrating posterior subperitoneal endometriosis involving contiguous digestive tract structures
  • Uterine malignancy within the last five years
  • Secreting ovarian tumor
  • Atypical endometrial hyperplasia
  • Unaddressed high grade cervical intra-epithelial lesions
  • Active sexually transmitted disease or pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Documented or suspected coagulopathies or long-term blood-thinner medications
  • Prior transmural myomectomy or prior endometrial ablation
  • Plasma FSH level > 40 IU/mL
  • Any contraindication to angiography (including iodine allergy and creatinine clearance < 60mL/min)
  • Any contraindication to MRI (claustrophobia, pace maker, etc.)
  • Any contraindication to the use of Embosphere®, Embozene® or NovaSure® according to the instruction for use
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or who are planning to become pregnant
  • Any condition or any situation that would prohibit women from coming to the investigational center for the 6 months follow-up
  • Women unable to understand the nature, risks, significance and implications of the clinical investigation
  • Women under legal protection

Treatment and study plan

Radiofrequency endometrial ablation

Procedure

Radiofrequency endometrial ablation

Uterine Artery Embolization

Procedure

Uterine artery embolization

Hysterectomy

Procedure

Hysterectomy

Primary outcomes

  1. proportion of 2-year clinical success of the intervention

    Time frame: Year 2

    proportion of 2-year clinical success of the intervention, defined as a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss (Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart-PBAC, score <100). Women undergoing RFA or UAE and requiring subsequent hysterectomy for persistent AUB before 2 years will be considered as clinical failure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion clinical success of the intervention

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 5, Year 1

    Proportion clinical success of the intervention, defined as a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss (PBAC score <100)

  2. Proportion in self-reported amenorrhea

    Time frame: Month 1, Month 5, Year 1, Year 2

    Proportion in self-reported amenorrhea (PBAC score = 0),

  3. Mean changes in severity of dysmenorrhea between UAE and RFA

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean changes in severity of dysmenorrhea between Uterine Artery Embolisation-UAE and Radiofrequency endometrial ablation-RFA) (visual analogue scale rating from 0 to 10),

  4. Mean changes in pelvic pain

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean changes in pelvic pain (visual analogue scale rating from 0-no pain to 10-extreme pain);

  5. Mean changes in deep dyspareunia

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean changes in deep dyspareunia (visual analogue scale rating from 0-no pain to 10-extreme pain);

  6. Mean changes in pelvic distension

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean changes in pelvic distension (visual analogue scale rating from 0-no pain to 10-extreme pain);

  7. Mean duration of hospital stay

    Time frame: Hospital discharge

    Mean duration of hospital stay (in days);

  8. Mean time to return to normal life

    Time frame: Month 1

    Mean time to return to normal life (in days);

  9. Mean change in quality of life

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean change in quality of life assessed using UFS-QoL questionnaire (Uterine Fibroid Symptom Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire, from 29 poins (best health-related quality of life to 145 (worse health-related quality of life)

  10. Mean change in endometriosis quality of life

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean change in endometriosis quality of life assessed using EHP-5 questionnaire (Short form endometriosis health profile, from 0 (best possible state of health) to 100 (worst possible state of health)

  11. Mean change in sexual life quality

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean change in sexual life quality using FSFI questionnaire (Female Sexual Function Index from 2 (worse sexual life quality to 36 (best sexual life quality; 26.55 indicating the lower score reflecting the existence of sexual disorders

  12. Mean satisfaction with the intervention

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean satisfaction with the intervention (7-point Likert scale) from hospital discharge to 2 years;

  13. Proportion of women with correction of iron-deficiency anemia

    Time frame: Year 2

    Proportion of women with correction of iron-deficiency anemia, if diagnosed at baseline

  14. Rate and severity of intra-operative complications

    Time frame: Hospital discharge

    Rate and severity of intra-operative complications (according to Clavien Dindo classification)

  15. Severity of intra-operative complications

    Time frame: Hospital discharge

    Severity of intra-operative complications (according to Clavien Dindo classification)

  16. Analgesic and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake

    Time frame: Week 1

    Analgesic and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake (type, daily dose, duration)

  17. Rate of post-operative adverse events

    Time frame: Year 2

    Rate of post-operative adverse events

  18. Severity of post-operative adverse events

    Time frame: Year 2

    Severity of post-operative adverse events

  19. Mean change in junctional zone thickness

    Time frame: Month 6

    Mean change in MRI junctional zone thickness accordingly to European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology-ESHRE- criteria bewteen Uterine Artery Embolisation-UAE and Radiofrequency endometrial ablation-RFA

  20. Mean change in percentage of necrosis

    Time frame: Month 6

    Mean change in MRI percentage of necrosis accordingly to European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology-ESHRE- criteria bewteen Uterine Artery Embolisation-UAE and Radiofrequency endometrial ablation-RFA

  21. Mean change in uterine vascularization

    Time frame: Month 6

    Mean change in MRI uterine vascularization accordingly to European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology-ESHRE- criteria bewteen Uterine Artery Embolisation-UAE and Radiofrequency endometrial ablation-RFA

  22. Mean change of hormonal parameters

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mean change of hormonal parameters (FH, estradiol), if post-operative amenorrhea occurred after Uterine Artery Embolisation-UAE and Radiofrequency endometrial ablation-RFA

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jean-Luc Brun, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 5 56 79 59 85

Marc Sapoval, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 1 56 09 37 41

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Other

Collaborators

  • French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health

Registry information

Official study title

Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation or Uterine Artery Embolization for Women With Adenomyosis-related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Eligible for Hysterectomy: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Each Intervention to Hysterectomy

Acronym: ADENOTREAT

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Sep 26, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.