M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
NCT Number: NCT03896646
This trial aims to improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor responses in patients undergoing Y90 radioembolization by using personalized dosimetry as part of treatment planning. Using standard calculations for Y90 doses may not be specific enough for individual patients given that there can be differences in how tumor cells and liver cells respond to radiation. Personalized dose plans may help improve treatment and outcomes in liver cancer.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To achieve tumor objective response rates of 75% using voxel based dosimetry when the mean dose (Dmean) to tumor is targeted to be greater than 200 Gray (Gy).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Correlate changes in liver function and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) incidence to the mean absorbed dose to normal liver.
II. Prospectively validate the accuracy of our published tumor dose response prediction based on the yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres (yttrium-90 [Y90]) tumor dose volume histograms (DVHs).
III. Correlate predicted tumor doses macroaggregated albumin (MAA) scan with actual doses delivered (Y90 scan).
IV. Develop a tumor dose response model prediction based on the MAA dose maps. V. Develop a model correlating normal liver radiation dose to liver function using single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (SPECT/CT HIDA) imaging.
VI. Develop a model correlating the relative tumor to normal liver enhancement on CT imaging and Cone beam CT imaging to the uptake on SPECT CT Tc99m MAA imaging (gold standard).
VII. Compare tumor and normal liver doses estimations from SPECT CT Bremsstrahlung imaging to positron emission tomography (PET) CT imaging.
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres using personalized dose measurements. Patients also undergo SPECT/CT HIDA scan before radioembolization and 2-4 months after radioembolization.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3 and 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Undergo SPECT/CT HIDA scan
Other names: CAT, CAT Scan, Computerized Axial Tomography, computerized tomography, CT, CT SCAN, tomography
Undergo SPECT/CT HIDA scan
Other names: HIDA Scan
Undergo SPECT/CT HIDA scan
Other names: Medical Imaging, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Single Photon Emission Tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, SPECT, SPECT imaging, SPECT SCAN, SPET, tomography, emission computed, single photon, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Undergo radioembolization with yttrium Y 90 glass microspheres
Other names: TheraSphere
Undergo yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization
Other names: Yttrium Y 90 Microsphere Therapy, Yttrium-90 Radioembolization
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Assessed with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. The ORR of treated tumors will be determined. Will perform a cluster bootstrap in which patients (not tumors) are sampled with replacement. Will construct a 95% confidence interval using the 2.5% and 97.5% quantiles of the bootstrap sampling distribution.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Will analyze the correlation in changes in liver function to the mean absorbed dose to normal liver. The hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan will be used to estimate the body-surface area corrected mebrofenin clearance rate in %-activity/sec/m^2 using published methodology. The change in liver function after radioembolization will be calculated and correlated to the radiation dose distribution to the normal liver. Will use Wilcoxon and two-sample t-tests to measure significance of association.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Will analyze the correlation in changes in CTCAE incidence to the mean absorbed dose to normal liver. Will create waterfall charts of CTCAE and mean absorbed normal liver in liver. Will use Wilcoxon and two-sample t-tests to measure significance of association and scatterplots and regression (linear or non-linear) to predict actual doses delivered from predicted tumor dose.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Lin's concordance correlation, t-test, and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed on pair-wise estimate of tumor doses. Develop tumor dose response curves using logistic regression and assess significance of parameters. Furthermore, we will compute the half-maximal dose (D50%), positive predictive value, negative predictive value and its 95% confidence interval from this prospective study. These values will be compared to those from the retrospective study for equivalence using the z-test.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Lin's concordance correlation, t-test, and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed on pair-wise estimate of tumor doses. Will use scatterplots and regression (linear or non-linear) to predict actual doses delivered from predicted tumor dose. A correlation analysis of the predicted tumor doses from the MAA images with the actual tumor doses delivered from Y90 images will be performed. The linear-correlation coefficient will be computed. A Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to compute the bias and the 95% limits of agreement.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Mean tumor doses based the planning 99mTc-MAA images will be computed using voxel dosimetry. A univariate logistic regression model will used to determine tumor dose metrics (D50%) that correlated with mRECIST-based tumor response at 3 and 6 months.
Time frame: Up to 6 months
A regression analysis of the change in liver function from the pre- and post-procedural HIDA SPECT/CT scans (changes in %/min) as a function of the normal liver absorbed dose will be performed.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04175912
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04605731
Adenocarcinoma, BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05269381
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05168163
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details