Radiesse® Safety Study For the Treatment of Hands

Proportion refers to percentage of subjects with device-and/or injection-related severe TEAEs.

Proportion refers to percentage of subjects with device-and/injection-related severe TEAEs.

The ROM was assessed using a Jamar finger goniometer. This test passively and actively measured the angle of motion of all five metacarpophalangeal joints in each hand right and left by determining the flexion and extension angles. The flexion determined how far each finger could be flexed at the metacarpophalangeal joint toward the palm. The extension determined how each finger could be extended at the metacarpophalangeal joint away from the palm. Degree scale ranges from 0 to 180 degree. Lower values in flexion angle and extension angle means more deterioration in hand function.

The functional dexterity test (FDT) assessed the fine motor skills (dexterity) that means it assessed the subject's ability to use the hand for daily tasks requiring the 3-jaw chunk prehensions that is buttoning, tying shoelaces, screwing a nut and bolt, and lacing yarn using a 16-hole peg board. Functional Dexterity was measured by noting the time in seconds on stopwatch for a hand to invert pegs on a 16-hole pegboard and this test assessed the ability to use hand for daily tasks. Longer times to complete the functional dexterity test means deterioration in hand function.

Sensation in the dorsum of each hand was conducted using a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament touch test. This was assessed using an index finger touch protocol, where by study subject was asked to report when a 2 to 3 centimeter (cm) light touch is felt at 3 different areas of the dorsum of each hand. Sensation results were coded for analysis such as response to 2.83 filament = 1, response to 3.61 filament = 2, response to 4.31 filament = 3, response to 4.56 filament = 4, response to 6.65 filament = 5, and no response to either filament = 6. For sensation testing a value of 1 (response to 2.83 filament) is considered normal while a value of 2 (response to 3.61) would show diminished light touch. Score ranges from 1 to 6. A higher value in sensation measurements is associated with a deterioration in hand function.

Hand strength was assessed in two ways grip and pinch strengths. Grip strength was assessed using a standard, adjustable-handle Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer. Pinch strength was assessed in three different ways such as tip (two-point) pinch, key (lateral) pinch, and palmar (three-jaw chuck) pinch using the Jamar hydraulic pinch gauge. Lower values (pounds) in hand grip and pinch strength are associated with deterioration in function.

The MHGS was used to measure clinical effectiveness of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made at a single, live rating at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility of veins and tendons); 4(very severe loss of fatty tissue; marked visibility of veins and tendons).

The MHGS was used to measure clinical effectiveness of the Radiesse hand treatments by a masked evaluator performing live, dorsal hand assessments. The MHGS was an ordinal scale; therefore, ratings were made at a single, live rating at a specific study time point. A measure of successful or improved treatment effect was demonstrated by a decrease in MHGS score. MHGS had 5 categories, where: 0 (no loss of fatty tissue); 1 (mild loss of fatty tissue; slight visibility of veins); 2 (moderate loss of fatty tissue; mild visibility of veins and tendons); 3 (severe loss of fatty tissue; moderate visibility of veins and tendons); 4(very severe loss of fatty tissue; marked visibility of veins and tendons).

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follow: +3 (very much improved), +2 (much improve), +1 (improved), 0 (no change), -1 (worse), -2 (much worse), and -3 (very much worse).

The GAIS is a 7-point scale. The 7-point scale are as follow: +3 (very much improved), +2 (much improve), +1 (improved), 0 (no change), -1 (worse), -2 (much worse), and -3 (very much worse).