Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00227747

Radiation Therapy and Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Stage II or Stage III Rectal Cancer

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine and oxaliplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. Giving radiation therapy together with combination chemotherapy before surgery may shrink the tumor so it can be removed. It is not yet known whether giving radiation therapy together with capecitabine is more effective with or without oxaliplatin before surgery in treating rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin to see how well they work compared to radiation therapy and capecitabine in treating patients who are undergoing surgery for stage II or stage III rectal cancer.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Centre Hospitalier d'Abbeville, Abbeville, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy comprising radiotherapy and capecitabine with vs without oxaliplatin followed by total mesorectal excision, in terms of the rate of complete surgical resection, in patients with resectable stage II or III rectal cancer.

Secondary

  • Compare overall and disease-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare clinical tumor response in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare acute and late toxicity of these regimens in these patients.
  • Determine biological parameters that predict tumor response and treatment-related toxicity in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare sphincter preservation and function in patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week and receive capecitabine once daily 5 days a week in weeks 1-5.
  • Arm II: Patient undergo radiotherapy and receive capecitabine as in arm I. Patients also receive oxaliplatin once weekly in weeks 1-5.

All patients undergo total mesorectal excision 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 590 patients will be accrued for this study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum
  • T3-4, N0-2, M0 disease by endorectal ultrasound
  • T2 disease located in the low rectum allowed provided lower pole is ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge
  • Tumor must be accessible to digital rectal examination (i.e., tumor located at low- or mid-rectum)
  • Resectable disease treatable with chemoradiotherapy
  • No unresectable disease (i.e., T4 disease with high risk for incomplete gross resection [i.e., R2])

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Age

  • 18 to 80

Performance status

  • ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

  • Not specified

Hematopoietic

  • WBC ≥ 1,500/mm^3
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm^3
  • Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL

Hepatic

  • Alkaline phosphatase normal
  • Bilirubin normal

Renal

  • Creatinine ≤ 130 μmol/L
  • No severe renal insufficiency

Cardiovascular

  • No cardiac insufficiency
  • No symptomatic coronary artery disease

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • No contraindication to study treatment
  • Prior acute intestinal obstruction allowed provided patient underwent surgical diversion with stoma
  • No history of other cancer except basal cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix
  • No peripheral neuropathy
  • No uncontrolled diabetes
  • No other uncontrolled severe disease
  • No geographical, social, or psychological condition that would preclude study follow-up

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Biologic therapy

  • Not specified

Chemotherapy

  • No prior chemotherapy for cancer
  • No other concurrent chemotherapy

Endocrine therapy

  • Not specified

Radiotherapy

  • No prior radiotherapy for cancer

Surgery

  • Not specified

Other

  • No concurrent phenytoin
  • No concurrent participation in another clinical trial of an experimental medical treatment

Treatment and study plan

Capecitabine

Drug

Oxaliplatin

Drug

conventional surgery

Procedure

neoadjuvant therapy

Procedure

radiation therapy

Radiation

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of complete surgical resection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

  2. Disease-free survival

  3. Sphincter preservation

  4. Sphincter function

  5. Biological parameters that predict tumor response and treatment-related toxicity

  6. Acute and late toxicity

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

UNICANCER

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing in a Preoperative Schedule the Result of Two Concurrent Chemoradiation Schemes (45 Gy + Capecitabine vs 50 Gy + Capecitabine - Oxaliplatin) on the Rate of Sterilization of the Operative Specimen in Resectable Rectal Carcinomas T3-4 No-2 Mo

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2013
First posted
Sep 28, 2005
Registry last updated
Feb 17, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.