Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01315249

QVA149 Versus Fluticasone/Salmeterol in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety/tolerability of indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149) (fixed-dose combination) with fluticasone/salmeterol over a 26-week period in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Malmedy, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Smoking history of at least 10 pack years
  • Diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (moderate-to-severe as classified by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] Guidelines, 2009)
  • Post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) >40% and < 80% of the predicted normal value and post-bronchodilator FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) <70%

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who have had a COPD exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics, systemic steroids (oral or intravenous) or hospitalization in the last year.
  • Patients requiring long term oxygen therapy on a daily basis for chronic hypoxemia.
  • Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients with concomitant pulmonary disease
  • Patients with a history of asthma
  • Any patient with lung cancer or a history of lung cancer (within last 5 years)
  • Patients with a history of certain cardiovascular co-morbid conditions

Treatment and study plan

indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149)

Drug

QVA149 capsules delivered via dry powder inhaler (SDDPI), once daily.

Placebo to fluticasone/salmeterol

Drug

Placebo to fluticasone/salmeterol delivered via Accuhaler® device, twice daily.

fluticasone/salmeterol

Drug

Fluticasone/salmeterol dry inhalation powder delivered via Accuhaler® device, twice daily.

Placebo to indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149)

Drug

Placebo to QVA149 delivered via dry powder inhaler (SDDPI), once daily

Primary outcomes

  1. Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Area Under the Curve (FEV1 AUC) 0-12

    Time frame: Week 26

    Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) was calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. FEV1 was normalized by 12 hours (divided by time). This outcome measures absolute values at week 26. Results are obtained from linear mixed model.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Area Under the Curve (FEV1 AUC) 0-12 Hours

    Time frame: Week 12

    Standardized Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were made between 0 and 12 hours after treatment. FEV1 was normalized by 12 hours (divided by time). This outcome measures absolute values at week 12. Results are obtained from linear mixed model.

  2. Forced Vital Capacity at All-time Points (Week 12)

    Time frame: -45 min, -15 min predose; 5 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 12 hr post-dose on week 12

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. FVC was assessed via spirometry. A positive change from baseline in FVC indicates improvement in lung function.

    This outcome measures absolute values at -45 min, -15 min predose; 5 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 12 hr post-dose week 12. Results are obtained from linear mixed model.

  3. Forced Vital Capacity at All-time Points (Week 26)

    Time frame: -45 min, -15 min predose; 5 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 12 hr post-dose on week 26

    Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. FVC was assessed via spirometry. A positive change from baseline in FVC indicates improvement in lung function.

    This outcome measures absolute values at -45 min, -15 min predose; 5 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2hr, 4 hr, 8 hr, 12 hr post-dose on week 26. Results are obtained from linear mixed model.

  4. Focal Score of the Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI)

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 26 weeks

    Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) captures changes from baseline. The TDI score is based on three domains with each domain scored from -3 (major deterioration) to +3 (major improvement), to give an overall score of -9 to +9, a negative score indicating a deterioration from baseline. A TDI focal score of 1 is considered to be a clinically significant improvement.

  5. Total Score of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C)

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 26 weeks

    The total score of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C) is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three components: symptoms, activity, and impacts. The lowest possible value is zero and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment in quality of life.

  6. Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks and 26 weeks

    Participants maintained a diary to record the daily number of puffs of rescue medication used to treat COPD symptoms.

  7. Change From Baseline in Symptom Scores Reported Using the Ediary

    Time frame: 12 weeks and 26 weeks

    Participants maintained an ediary to record daily symptom scores (AM and PM) over 12 weeks and 26 weeks of treatment. This analysis compares the mean symptom scores over 12 weeks and 26 weeks compared to baseline. The diary records morning and evening daily clinical symptoms including cough, wheezing, shortness of breath, sputum volume, sputum purulence, night time awakenings and rescue medication use.

    Scale ranges: ranges are 0 to 3 with varying scale descriptions that pertain to the question being asked.

    0 is the minimum score = "none" or "No symptoms" or "never" or "No"

    • = mild, a little
    • = moderate
    • = severe For the scale range provided, high values represent a worse outcome.
  8. Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at All-time Points (12 Weeks)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

    After 12 weeks of treatment, Inspiratory Capacity (IC) was measured via spirometry, conducted according to internationally accepted standards. The mean of 3 acceptable measurements was calculated and reported in liters.

  9. Inspiratory Capacity (IC) at All-time Points (26 Weeks)

    Time frame: 26 weeks

    After 26 weeks of treatment, Inspiratory Capacity (IC) was measured via spirometry, conducted according to internationally accepted standards. The mean of 3 acceptable measurements was calculated and reported in liters.

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: 26 weeks

    The assessment of safety was based on Adverse Events. A summary of adverse events is presented with this outcome, additional details are provided in Adverse Events Section.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 26-week Treatment, Multi-center, Randomized, Doubleblind, Double Dummy, Parallel-group Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of QVA149 Compared to Fluticasone/Salmeterol in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Acronym: ILLUMINATE

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Mar 15, 2011
Registry last updated
Aug 9, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.