Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03904589

Questionnaires Assessing the Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Coronary Heart Disease

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in Europe and worldwide. In 2014, they led to more than 4 million deaths in Europe, and coronary heart disease alone accounts for nearly 1.8 million deaths, or 20% of all deaths in Europe. However, mortality from cardiovascular disease and, especially, coronary heart disease has declined in recent decades. This has been made possible by improving the quality of care provided to patients. Several studies have been conducted to demonstrate this improvement in the quality of care, but they mainly measure the functional results of treatment, morbidity and mortality, survival and prolongation of life.

However, patient-centered outcomes such as health-related quality of life outcomes (such as mental function, ability to resume activities of daily living, social relationship) are also considered important outcomes in the management and monitoring of these diseases. Some studies have shown that, even when other risks factors are controlled, a poor quality of life related to health is a prediction factor for morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease.

Some studies have suggested that health-related quality of life should be strongly associated with lifestyle, co-morbidities, and mental function.

Some factors have been identified as factors that may affect the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease, including depression, anxiety, dyspnea and angina pectoris. Depression and anxiety were negatively associated with health-related quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease. As for dyspnea, it has been shown that in stable patients who have had a myocardial infarction, its increase at 1 month after initiation of treatment is strongly associated with a decrease in the quality of life and with an increased risk of re-hospitalization and death. It is therefore important to measure these factors when the quality of life is assessed in patients with coronary heart disease.

The importance of assessing quality of life is that the clinician and the patient often have different concerns: what the clinician considers to be a "successful procedure" is not always considered as such by the patient. Results related to quality of life (results rarely evaluated) are among the results that really interest the patient. Indeed, many patients consider the quality of additional years of life acquired as important as the lifespan, so the goal of today's medicine is to improve the quantity and quality of life of the additional years of life acquired. To ensure this improvement, the assessment of health-related quality of life should be integrated into the daily clinical practice of coronary heart disease management.

The objective of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of this practice throughout the traject of care, by using several standardized questionnaires.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Coronary Heart Disease Cardiovascular Diseases Coronary Disease Heart Diseases Myocardial Ischemia Vascular Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, 1020, Belgium

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Confirmed coronary disease

Exclusion criteria

Emergencies, patients lost to follow-up.

Treatment and study plan

Quality of Life Assessment

Diagnostic Test

Quality of life will be assessed by means of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire.

Primary outcomes

  1. Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)

    Time frame: Baseline - at hospital admission

    Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), validated and specific questionnaire of angina pectoris which deals with 5 dimensions of quality of life: physical limits, stability of angina, frequency of angina, perception of the disease, satisfaction with the treatment. Each domain has a score calculated on a scale of 0 (= worst health quality) to 100 (= best health quality).

  2. Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)

    Time frame: 1 month after hospital admission

    Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), validated and specific questionnaire of angina pectoris which deals with 5 dimensions of quality of life: physical limits, stability of angina, frequency of angina, perception of the disease, satisfaction with the treatment. Each domain has a score calculated on a scale of 0 (= worst health quality) to 100 (= best health quality).

  3. Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7)

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital admission

    Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), validated and specific questionnaire of angina pectoris which deals with 5 dimensions of quality of life: physical limits, stability of angina, frequency of angina, perception of the disease, satisfaction with the treatment. Each domain has a score calculated on a scale of 0 (= worst health quality) to 100 (= best health quality).

  4. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)

    Time frame: Baseline - at hospital admission

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) questionnaire used to assess depression. The score is calculated on a scale of 0 (= low possibility of having symptoms related to depression) to 6 (= high possibility of having symptoms related to depression).

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)

    Time frame: 1 month after hospital admission

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) questionnaire used to assess depression. The score is calculated on a scale of 0 (= low possibility of having symptoms related to depression) to 6 (= high possibility of having symptoms related to depression).

  6. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2)

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital admission

    Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) questionnaire used to assess depression. The score is calculated on a scale of 0 (= low possibility of having symptoms related to depression) to 6 (= high possibility of having symptoms related to depression).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rose Dyspnea Score

    Time frame: Baseline - at hospital admission

    The Rose Dyspnea Scale is a four-item questionnaire that assesses a patients' dyspnea level with common activities. One point is assigned to each activity associated with dyspnea. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea.

  2. Rose Dyspnea Score

    Time frame: 1 month after hospital admission

    The Rose Dyspnea Scale is a four-item questionnaire that assesses a patients' dyspnea level with common activities. One point is assigned to each activity associated with dyspnea. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea.

  3. Rose Dyspnea Score

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital admission

    The Rose Dyspnea Scale is a four-item questionnaire that assesses a patients' dyspnea level with common activities. One point is assigned to each activity associated with dyspnea. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no dyspnea with activity and 4 indicates significant limitations due to dyspnea.

  4. Percentage of autonomous filling

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital admission

    Percentage of questionnaires filled autonomously by the patient

  5. Percentage of compliance

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital admission

    Percentage of questionnaires filled by the patient

  6. Average filling time per questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 months after hospital admission

    Average time (in minutes) the patients need to fill one questionnaire

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

José Castro

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Questionnaires Assessing the Quality of Life of Patients Treated for Coronary Heart Disease: a Pilot Study to Establish Outcome Indicators for Care Pathways From the Patient's Point of View

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Apr 5, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 19, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.