Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
NCT Number: NCT06634732
This is a prospective observational study to observe the diagnostic efficacy of a quantitative ultrasound assessment plan for pathological accumulation in the abdominal cavity space of critically ill patients, and to explore its correlation with patient clinical outcomes.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025, China
Intra-abdominal lesions, such as hemorrhage and inflammation/infection, often lead to pathological accumulations, posing serious challenges for critically ill patients. These lesions can rapidly induce intra-abdominal hypertension and organ damage, which may progress to hemorrhagic or septic shock, endangering patients' lives. Intra-abdominal hemorrhage, especially surgery-related hemorrhage, is difficult to detect early, and existing assessment methods like CT scans have limited applicability in critically ill patients. Intra-abdominal infections account for a high proportion of infections in critically ill patients, with concurrent sepsis or shock having high mortality rates. Despite advancements in critical care medicine, the mortality rate from intra-abdominal infections remains stubbornly high. Accurate assessment of the source and extent of infection is crucial for treatment, yet routine physical examinations have low sensitivity in critically ill patients, making imaging examinations the primary method. However, while abdominal CT is considered the gold standard, it is limited by insufficient dynamic monitoring and difficulties in patient transport. Bedside ultrasound plays a significant role in the monitoring of critically ill patients due to its portability, non-invasiveness, and real-time dynamic capabilities. It can assess sources of hemorrhage and infection, quantify the extent of lesions, and monitor hemodynamic changes. Therefore, this study aims to develop a comprehensive ultrasound assessment protocol that covers the peritoneal cavity and posterior peritoneal space. Through a prospective observational study, we aim to validate its sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing pathological accumulations such as intra-abdominal hemorrhage/infection and explore its correlation with patient clinical outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-20, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-20, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
Time to initiate enteral nutrition after admission to ICU in hours
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
Intra-abdominal pressure in mmHg
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
C-reactive protein in mg/L
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
procalcitonin in ng/L
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
white blood cell count
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
time to achieve enteral nutrition targets in hours
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
serum albumin in g/L
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
prealbumin in mg/L
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
Duration of CRRT (Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy) treatment in hours
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
duration of mechanical ventilation in hours
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
length of ICU stay in days
Time frame: up to 28 days after admission to ICU
survival or death when transfer out of the ICU
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-71, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-15, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-4, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-10, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-10, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: up to 3 days after admission to ICU
score range from 0-2, higher scores indicate a worse outcome
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ruijin Hospital
Other
Study on the Application Value of Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment Plan for Abdominal Cavity Space in Critically Ill Patients
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07293078
Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF)
Framingham, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00736723
Critical Illness, Critically Ill
Ulm, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07680816
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
View Trial DetailsNCT06696391
Cardiovascular Diseases, Critical Care, Intensive Care
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details