Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05171257

Quantifying Gram-negative Resistance to Empiric Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health emergency estimated to be responsible for 700,000 deaths per year worldwide, and it is well known that previous antibiotic exposure is the single most contributing factor. For example, the use of non-antipseudomonal agents can increase risk for any P. aeruginosa strain; however, the use of an agent with antipseudomonal activity would select for resistance to that particular antimicrobial agent or class. Demonstrated that each additional day of exposure to any antipseudomonal beta-lactam is associated with an increased risk of new resistance development.

The study seeks to determine whether the choice of empiric therapy (i.e., the same agent versus a different agent from prior antibiotic exposure) has any effect on the likelihood of in vitro activity against GN pathogens (GNPs) in a subsequent infection.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75203, United States

About this study

Antimicrobials are the most commonly prescribed drugs in medicine, resulting in inappropriate use in approximately 50% of cases Misuse can have devastating effects through resistance development which further complicates selection of appropriate empiric antibiotics. In cases of severe illness, it is easy for clinicians to rely on broad spectrum antibiotics to cover the majority of likely pathogens when dealing with a presumed bacterial infection. However, this practice perpetuates the cycle of resistance. Inappropriate empiric therapy is associated with worse outcomes in resistant Gram-negative (GN) bacteremia and pneumonia, so clinicians should strive for targeted coverage that is specific to the pathogen of interest when possible. Johnson et al. showed that patients with recent antibiotic exposure had greater inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy (45.4% vs. 21.2%; p < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (51.3% vs. 34.0%; p < 0.001) compared with patients without recent antibiotic exposure.

The 2020 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial Resistant Gram-Negative Infections reports an increased risk of resistance with antibiotic exposure in the past 30 days. Additionally, expert opinion prompts consideration of empiric coverage with a GN agent from a different class that offers comparable spectrum of activity from previous exposure. The 2019 Community-acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and IDSA lists prior antibiotic use in the last 90 days as a risk factor for P. aeruginosa.The 2016 Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (HAP, VAP) Guidelines from IDSA, list antibiotic use in the past 90 days as a risk factor for P. aeruginosa and other GN organisms in HAP. Additionally, antibiotic use in the past 90 days is listed as having an association with increased risk of multi-drug resistant VAP. The CAP, HAP, and VAP Guidelines do not mention using the same versus different agent as empiric choice if previous antibiotic exposure is to an anti-pseudomonal agent.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age
  • GNP pneumonia or bacteremia during hospital admission
  • Previous IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours in the past 90 days
  • Culture MIC data available

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with a history of isolate resistance in the previous six months to antibiotics being studied
  • Patients that received antibiotics within five days prior to study inclusion
  • Patients on more than one anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam antibiotics (excluding emergency department doses) during previous exposure

Treatment and study plan

IV antibiotic treatment from prior

Drug

patients receiving same IV antibiotic treatment from prior

differing IV antibiotic treatment

Drug

patients receiving differing IV antibiotics from prior

Primary outcomes

  1. Rates of resistance

    Time frame: charts from 4/1/2017 to 3/31/2021

    Rates of resistance in patients receiving empiric therapy with the same IV antibiotics from prior (repeat group) compared to rates of resistance in patients receiving differing IV antibiotics from prior (change group)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intensive Care Unite LOS(ICU LOS)

    Time frame: charts from 4/1/2017 to 3/31/2021

    Intensive Care Unite LOS(ICU LOS)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Methodist Health System

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Quantifying Gram-negative Resistance to Empiric Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit - Repeat ExpoSure to AntimicRobial Therapy (RESTART)

Acronym: RESTART

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 28, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.