State Medical University
Kazan', Tatarstan Republic, Russia
NCT Number: NCT05889000
There are currently no specific validated patient-centric tools for the clinical evaluation of patients with chronic pelvic venous disorders (CPVD). The study involves the development and validation of a questionnaire for the quality of life and a scale of disease severity for a patient with pelvic venous disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
Female
Observational
Kazan', Tatarstan Republic, Russia
This retrospective study will include patients with pelvic varicose veins seen between 2018 and 2020.
2 groups of patients will be formed. The main group will be women with verified CPVD, the comparison group - 93 participants without signs of CPVD.
All patients will respond to the previously developed Pelvic Varicose Veins Questionnaire (PVVQ) and Pelvic Venous Clinical Severity Score (PVCSS) as submitted questionnaires.
Validation of the PVVQ questionnaire and the PVCSS scale will be carried out in accordance with the methodology for studying the quality of life and clinical scales in accordance with international standards. The main psychometric properties of both instruments in terms of validity, reliability and sensitivity will be assessed.
The validation protocol will include certain steps: 1) pre-testing, 2) assessing the reliability of the questionnaire, 3) assessing the validity, 4) assessing the sensitivity.
To assess the degree of internal consistency, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient will be used, which is calculated by the formula: α = N * r / (1 + r * (N - 1)), where N is the number of components under study, r is the average correlation coefficient between the components. The study will assess the reliability of the questionnaire and the scale as a whole, as well as the impact on the overall reliability of each individual domain. Domain correlation will be assessed using Spearman's rank correlation method (r).
To assess discriminant validity, the level of quality of life and disease severity of patients with VBT will be compared with similar levels of healthy participants.
Assessment of internal consistency will be performed by retesting stable patients without treatment after 14 days, followed by calculation of Cronbach's alpha.
To study the degree of representation of the studied psychological construct in the test results, both types of construct validity will be determined: convergent and discriminant.
Based on this examination of the data, objective information on the validity, reliability and sensitivity of PVVQ and PVCSS will be obtained.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
questionnaire responses - Pelvic Varicose Veins Questionnaire (PVVQ) and Pelvic Venous Clinical Severity Score (PVCSS)
Time frame: At baseline
To assess the degree of internal consistency, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient will be used, which is calculated by the formula: α = N * r / (1 + r * (N - 1)), where N is the number of components under study, r is the average correlation coefficient between the components. The study will assess the reliability of the questionnaire and the scale as a whole, as well as the impact on the overall reliability of each individual domain. Domain correlation will be assessed using Spearman's rank correlation method (r).
Time frame: At baseline
To assess discriminant validity, the level of quality of life and disease severity of patients with CPVD will be compared with similar levels of healthy participants.
Time frame: At baseline and after 14 days
Assessment of internal consistency will be performed by retesting stable patients without treatment after 14 days, followed by calculation of Cronbach's alpha.
Time frame: At baseline
To assess the validity, the reliability of the construct will be studied by determining the criterion validity, i.e. identifying the correlation coefficient or relationships between the scales of both questionnaires with some external criterion. The scales of the SF-36 questionnaire will be used as external criteria for assessing the quality of life, and elements of visual analogue scales will be used to assess the severity of the disease.
Time frame: At baseline and after 2 months
To assess the sensitivity, a comparison of the indicators of the questionnaire questionnaires at the points before treatment and 2 months after the treatment will be carried out.
Kazan State Medical University
Other
Quality of Life Questionnaire and Disease Severity Scale for Patients With Chronic Pelvic Venous Disorders: Design and Validation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03921788
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04512443
Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Kazan', Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT02796092
Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Zaragoza, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT07472504
Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
View Trial Details