Innovations for Poverty Action
Nairobi, Kenya
NCT Number: NCT04208191
Evaluation of a quality improvement (QI) collaborative aimed at improving person-centered care (PCC) for maternal health (MH) and family planning (FP) services
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me15 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Nairobi, Kenya
Evaluation of a quality improvement (QI) collaborative in public facilities in Nairobi and Kiambu Counties in Kenya aimed at improving person-centered care (PCC) for maternal health (MH) and family planning (FP) services.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for Women:
Exclusion criteria
for Women:
Inclusion criteria
for Providers:
Exclusion criteria
for Providers
Facilities that participated in a QI collaborative to improve PCC for MH and FP services
Time frame: Baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 2-weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 4-weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 6-weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 10-weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 24 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 26 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 30 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 30.5 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: about 31 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 31.5 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 32 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 32.5 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-100; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: Baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 4 weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 6 weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 8 weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: 10 weeks post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 24 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 26 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 30 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 31 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 31.5 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 32 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: About 32.5 months post baseline
Survey conducted with women: self report of experiences of care. Possible range 0-43; higher the score the better the experience of care
Time frame: Baseline
Survey and In-depth interviews conducted with providers; perceptions of person-centered care
Time frame: About 24 months post baseline
Survey conducted with providers; perceptions of person-centered care
Time frame: About 26 months post baseline
Survey conducted with providers; perceptions of person-centered care
Time frame: About 30 months post baseline
Survey and In-depth interviews conducted with providers; perceptions of person-centered care
Time frame: About 30 months post baseline
Survey conducted with intervention providers on facility readiness to implement QI; Possible range 0-154; higher the score the more ready facility is to participate in QI activities
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Strengthening People-centered Accessibility, Respect, and Quality for Maternal Health and Family Planning Services in Nairobi, Kenya
Acronym: SPARQ_QIK
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04208867
Delivery, Maternal Health
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
View Trial DetailsNCT01894126
Family Planning, Maternal Health
Nairobi, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT06085105
Adverse Outcomes, Behavior
Navrongo, Ghana
View Trial DetailsNCT07200323
Depression, Postpartum, Depressive Disorder
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details