Quality Assessment Creatinines in Plasma and Urine

In clinical practice the 24-hour creatinine clearance is often used to obtain an impression of renal function. However, the glomerular filtration rate is considered to be the best indicator of renal function. For practical and financial purposes, GFR is often estimated by means of serum creatinine based equations. These equations are also used in internation guidelines to define and classify chronic kidney disease. Therefore, accurate creatinine measurements are important to make reliable estimates of renal function. However, previous research has revealed a large variability in creatinine measurements using different measuring methods. In this study the investigators aim to establish the degree of variability in different methods to measure creatinine in a heterogenous group of Caucasian people with and without renal function loss and the influence of this variability on renal function estimating equations and the 24-hour creatinine clearance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease Chronic Disease Disease Attributes Female Urogenital Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Kidney Diseases Male Urogenital Diseases Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Renal Insufficiency Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Urogenital Diseases Urologic Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Isala Clinics

Zwolle, Netherlands

About this study

Apart from the 24-hour creatinine clearance, also formulas to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are increasingly used to get an impression from renal function in recent years. Based on these renal function measurements, clinical decisions are made as well as drug dose adjustments. The use of reliable serum creatinine measurements is therefore important to get accurate renal function estimates. However, serum creatinine is one of the most variable routine laboratory tests.

The importance of calibration to a traceable reference measurement of serum creatinine has been stressed. However, this standardization does not correct for analytical non-specificity problems, which occurs in certain techniques to measure creatinine, leading to under- or overestimation of the true creatinine concentration.

The aim of this cross-sectional observational study is to examine the degree of variability between diverse methods to measure creatinine in plasma and urine in a heterogenous group of Caucasian people with and without renal function loss and the influence hereof on the 24-hour creatinine clearance and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation and the consequences for chronic kidney disease staging.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

All patients >18 years presenting at the laboratory facility for a 24-hour creatinine clearance, or
Persons >18 years, undergoing a renal replacing therapy by means of hemo-/peritoneal dialysis that had a KT/V appointment between May 2010 - January 2011

Exclusion criteria

Patients <18 years

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

To investigate the bias and precision between routine laboratory techniques to measure creatinine in plasma, urine and dialysate when compared to the gold standard to measure creatinine.

Time frame: 6 months (plasma, urine and dialysate samples are collected only once during the running of the study)

Creatinine concentrations of plasma, urine and/or dialysate samples will be measured using different techniques applied in daily clinical practice (jaffe, enzymatic and HPLC). For each participant creatinine will also be measured using the gold standard measure LC-MS. LCMS values will be used as reference method against which routine methods will be compared by means of absolute bias and precision per method group. Absolute bias is the mean difference between SCr values measured by individual laboratories and SCr target values; precision is defined as the SD of the absolute bias.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical Research Foundation, The Netherlands

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Quality Assessment of Creatinines in Plasma and Urine

Important dates

Study start: 2010
Primary completion: 2011
Study completion: 2011
First posted: Apr 11, 2012
Registry last updated: Apr 11, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed