Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00527371

PVP Compared to TURP for the Treatment of Benign Hyperplasia of the Prostate

In patients with an enlarged prostate (benign prostatic hyperplasia), is treatment using photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP 120 Watt) as effective and cost-effective as the standard treatment of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)? A higher-power (120W) laser system has recently been approved by Health Canada for the treatment of an enlarged prostate. This system, which uses laser energy to vaporize the prostate tissue, will be compared with the current standard treatment of transurethral resection of the prostate. This newer generation laser may offer more efficient removal of prostate tissue with fewer complications and may result in clinical and economic benefits compared to the standard treatment. However, there have been no studies comparing the 120W laser with the standard transurethral resection of the prostate. This study will provide currently unavailable information for clinicians and decision makers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

41 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

McMaster Institute of Urology at St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Following a review of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by the Medical Advisory Secretariat (MAS) of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), the Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee (OHTAC) recommended that "a registry study be conducted to establish longer term effectiveness and complication rates for PVP given the likelihood of increasing diffusion of this technology". Since then, the Medical Devices Bureau of the Therapeutic Products Directorate, Health Canada, has licensed in April 30, 2007, a 120W-KTP laser system (Greenlight HPS (TM)) for sale in Canada. As several new 120W systems will be operating in Ontario in the coming months, there is an urgent need to evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and durability of 120W PVP compared to conventional TURP in the treatment of patients with BPH.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male over the age of 40
  • Diagnosed with symptomatic/obstructive symptoms secondary to BPH requiring surgical intervention as determined by their urologist
  • Experienced lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to BPH > 3 months in duration
  • IPSS value of > 12
  • Peak urinary flow < 15mL/sec on voided volume (minimum of 150 ml)
  • Prostate size, as measured by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), less than 100cc in volume
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of physical status, class 1-3
  • Able to read, understand, and sign the Informed Consent
  • Willing and able to comply with all follow-up requirements including multiple follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

  • Transvesically measured post-void residual volume >400 mL
  • Currently in urinary retention
  • Chronic urinary retention
  • Medications impairing bladder contractibility
  • Uncorrectable bleeding disorders or long- term anticoagulation that cannot be stopped
  • Recent myocardial infarction or coronary artery stent placement
  • Any of the following diseases which appear to involve the bladder: myasthenia gravis, diabetes neuropathy, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or Parkinson disease
  • Any patient with idiopathic atonic bladder
  • Major pelvic fractures that involved damage to the external urinary sphincter
  • Recently completed definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer
  • Active localized or systemic infections; including active urinary tract infection
  • Active cystolithiasis, urethral strictures, bladder neck contracture, or acute prostatitis affecting bladder function
  • If patient's PSA value > PSA age-adjusted normal value, patient needs to have a negative biopsy before participating in the study
  • Confirmed malignancy of the prostate
  • Bladder cancer treated with transurethral resection of bladder cancer (TURBT) within 12 months or any patients treated with Bacillius Calmette-Guerin (BCG)
  • Bilateral hydronephrosis on renal ultrasound
  • Urethral strictures or a residual volume >400 ml
  • Immunocompromised
  • Previous TURP

Treatment and study plan

GreenLight HPS (TM)laser system [Photoselective Vaporization of the prostate (PVP)]

Device

Photoselective vaporization of the prostate will be performed using the GreenLight HPS (TM)laser system (American Medical Systems), which is a high-power (120W) potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser which was licensed by Health Canada in April 2007.

Other names: PVP

transurethral resection of the prostate

Procedure

Transurethral resection of the prostate will be performed with a continuous flow resectoscope and unipolar cautery using a standard technique.

Other names: TURP

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome is the change in International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS).

    Time frame: 6-months after surgery versus baseline.

Secondary outcomes

  1. International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS)

    Time frame: 1, 3, 12 and 24 months post procedure

  2. Peak or maximum urinary flow rate

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 6 months post surgery

  3. Post-void residual volume

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6 month post procedure

  4. Length of operation/procedure

    Time frame: During procedure

  5. Frequency of blood transfusion

    Time frame: During procedure

  6. Change in hemoglobin in recovery room

    Time frame: Following procedure

  7. Postoperative serum electrolytes (sodium, creatinine) in recovery room

    Time frame: Following procedure

  8. Duration of catheterization

    Time frame: 10 days after procedure

  9. Occurrence of urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture requiring re-operation

    Time frame: up to 2 years after the procedure

  10. Re-bleed rate requiring hospitalization

    Time frame: 1 month after procedure

  11. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value

    Time frame: 3 months follow-up

  12. Rate of re-operation

    Time frame: At 1, 6, 12 and 24 months following intervention

  13. Rate of re-catheterization

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months following intervention

  14. Rate of sexual dysfunction (SHIM) and/or retrograde ejaculation (specific question)

    Time frame: Pre-op, 1, 3, 6 months

  15. Use of medications for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 6 months after intervention

  16. Long-term durability of PVP and TURP (i.e. readmission, drug therapy)

    Time frame: At 12 and 24 months after intervention

  17. IPSS quality of life score (Bother-score)

    Time frame: Pre-op, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

  18. EQ-5D utility score

    Time frame: Pre-op, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

  19. Resource utilization: hospital length of stay, OR time, pain medications, follow-up care (e.g. urologist visits, lab tests)

    Time frame: Pre-op, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

  20. Productivity losses

    Time frame: Pre-op, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Other

Collaborators

  • Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Controlled Trial Comparing Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP-120W) to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) for the Treatment of Benign Hyperplasia of the Prostate (BPH)

Acronym: PVP

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Sep 10, 2007
Registry last updated
Feb 12, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.