Pulsenmore ES home ultrasound device
DevicePregnant participants will use Pulsenmore ES device to assess the safety and the efficacy of the device in monitoring fetal parameters
NCT Number: NCT05329077
This is a multicenter, prospective, investigational device study designed to evaluate:
The safety, feasibility, and accuracy of the device, when used by pregnant individuals
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Center for Fetal Medicine and Women's Ultrasound, Los Angeles, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pregnant participants will use Pulsenmore ES device to assess the safety and the efficacy of the device in monitoring fetal parameters
Time frame: Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy
The presence or absence of device derived fetal cardiac activity would be matched with the presence or absence of fetal cardiac activity derived by the ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Time frame: Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy
Comparison of device derived amniotic fluid level status, normal or abnormal, (measured by maximal vertical pocket in cm) would be matched with amniotic fluid level status derived from the ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Time frame: Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy
Whether fetal presentation could be assessed or could not be assessed from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Time frame: Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy
Whether placental location could be assessed or could not be assessed from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Time frame: Test to be conducted during week 14-38 of pregnancy
Whether fetal movement could be detected or could not be detected from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
Time frame: Test to be conducted during week >27-38 of pregnancy
Whether fetal breathing could be detected or could not be detected from device derived input compared to the input from ground truth (in-clinic ultrasound scan)
PulseNmore
Industry
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Pulsenmore ES Home Ultrasound Device in Pregnant Women
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06622408
Agnosia, Analgesia
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07567755
Behavior, Breast Feeding
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06442358
Perinatal Care
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05960357
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Mersin, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details