pulsed-field ablation
Deviceapplication of pulsed-field energy for pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations
NCT Number: NCT05922917
Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Our project (The PIVCO study) aims to determine a more standardized procedure representing optimal ablation strategy for patients suffering from PsAF using PFA and multielectrode ablation catheters. The central hypothesis is that ablation of the posterior LA wall (PWI), together with mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation added on top of PVI, will be associated with better effects in terms of rhythm control. Given the speed, safety, and ease of standardization of ablation using electroporation, a demonstration of the superiority of either approach could significantly impact the current standard of clinical care.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University Hospital, Olomouc, Czechia
Purpose Since a new method called pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged, allowing significantly simpler, safer, and faster creation of ablative lesions in paroxysmal AF and PsAF (13), redefining the "optimal" ablation approach started to appear mandatory. Our project (The PIVCO study) aims to determine a more standardized procedure representing optimal ablation strategy for patients suffering from PsAF using PFA and multielectrode ablation catheters. The central hypothesis is that ablation of the posterior LA wall (PWI), together with mitral and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation added on top of PVI, will be associated with better effects in terms of rhythm control. Given the speed, safety, and ease of standardization of ablation using electroporation, a demonstration of the superiority of either approach could significantly impact the current standard of clinical care.
Primary endpoints
(1) The primary endpoint will be a recurrence of AF (or atrial tachycardia, AT) lasting >30 seconds as assessed using repeated 7-day ECG Holter monitoring in patients without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the entire post-blanking follow-up, i.e., starting three months after the index procedure. All patients should complete a 12-month follow-up period.
Secondary endpoints
(1) The first recurrence of on-AADs AF/AT lasting >6 minutes during the post-blanking follow-up period (i.e., disregarding all off-AAD episodes). (2) Number of hospitalizations and emergency out-patient visits related to AF/AT recurrence, worsening of heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases. (3) Number of electrical cardioversions. (4) Proportion of patients on AADs at the end of follow-up. (5) PFA-related complications. (6) Assessment of the quality of life using standardized instruments (AFEQT, EQ5D). (7) Feasibility of achieving a complete block of the mitral isthmus and PWI using PFA (8) Proportion of patients with delayed conduction into LAA after mitral line (9) Number of patients that underwent repeated ablations during follow-up.
Interventions
Procedures that will be performed on the day of admission for ablation:
Catheter ablation strategy
In all patients, ablation will be performed by electroporation (Farapulse system), as recommended, with at least two applications per each ablation spot. Based on the randomization, patients will be treated using two distinct approaches:
Group PVI (Pulmonary vein isolation only)
Group PVI+ (Complex ablation procedure)
Follow-up The following information will be recorded on the day of discharge: Date of hospital discharge after ablation, length of in-hospital stays, early complications of ablation, and medication at the discharge (all antiarrhythmic drugs except beta-blockers will permanently be discontinued at hospital discharge).
Four 7-day Holter ECG monitoring recordings will be done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after ablation (in case of recurrence of AF after ablation, standard treatment according to the treating physician's decision, including the possibility of antiarrhythmic medication, electrical cardioversion or repeated ablation, will be applied).
A telephone visit be done at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after ablation with an inquiry about complications of the ablation procedure, perceived recurrence of AF, use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication, elective cardioversion, hospitalization, and reasons for it.
An in-office visit will be done 12 months after ablation in the hospital's out-patient department, including an inquiry about complications of the ablation procedure, perceived and documented recurrence of AF, use of antiarrhythmic and antithrombotic medication, elective cardioversion, hospitalization and reasons for it after ablation, physical examination, medication history, ECG, echocardiography and quality of life questionnaires.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
application of pulsed-field energy for pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablations
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
The primary endpoint will be a recurrence of AF (or atrial tachycardia, AT) lasting >30 seconds as assessed using repeated 7-day ECG Holter monitoring in patients without anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the entire post-blanking follow-up, i.e., starting three months after the index procedure. All patients should complete a 12-month follow-up period.
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
The first recurrence of on-AADs AF/AT lasting >6 minutes during the post-blanking follow-up period (i.e., disregarding all off-AAD episodes).
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
Number of hospitalizations and emergency out-patient visits related to AF/AT recurrence, worsening of heart failure, or other cardiovascular diseases.
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
Number of electrical cardioversions.
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
PFA-related complications.
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
Assessment of the quality of life using standardised instrument AFEQT. Three domains and global QoL will be assessed using a calculated score of 0 to 100% (100% = the best quality of life) based on the patient´s response to 20 questions.
Time frame: 1 year following ablation procedure
Assessment of mobility, self-care, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression by a Likert scale (1-3, 1 = no limitation, 3 = severe limitation) complemented by visual aid score (1-100, the higher score, the better quality of life).
České Budějovice Hospital
Other
Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Complex Procedure Using Pulsed-field Ablation in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Acronym: PIVCO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05988411
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06096337
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05986526
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Baden, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05005949
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details