Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05029440

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Versus Pulsed High Intensity Laser in the of Osteoprosis

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disease. Although osteoporosis is widely considered to be much more prevalent in women approximately 39% of new osteoporotic fractures estimated to have occurred Worldwide in 2000 were in men. A number of studies investigate the effect of physical therapy modalities in treatment of osteoporosis. The use of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) represents an attractive alternative for Osteoporosis. Previous studies suggested that pulsed electromagnetic field could be beneficial for increase bone mineral density in osteoporotic patients, but there is a lack of Knowledge about the comparison with pulsed high laser therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Osteopenia or Osteoporosis Bone Diseases Bone Diseases, Metabolic Metabolic Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Osteoporosis

Age range

30 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Al Noor Specialized Hospital

Mecca, 715, Saudi Arabia

About this study

Objectives: This randomized controlled study aims to investigate theEffect of Full-Body Pulsed Electromagnetic Field versus Pulsed High Intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Men with Osteopenia or Osteoporosis Methods: Ninty male patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis will participate in this study, their age ranges between 30-60 years. They have BMD T-scores ≤ - 1.5. All patients will be randomized into one of three groups. Group one received PEMF and exercise (PEMF+EX), group two received HILT and exercise (HILT+EX) and group three will be treated by exercise alone (Ex). The exercise training program will include treadmill and aerobic exercises for hip and upper limb will be performed for 50 minutes.PEMF was administered to the whole body for PEMF groups using a 1.8×0.6m mat 30 minutes/day, 3 times/week for 3 months. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) will assess Bone mineral density BMD (g/cm2), bone mineral content (BMC), T-Score and Z-Score at the lumbar spine, proximal femur and forearm region, bone markers (25-hydroxy Vit D , Total, undercarboxylated Ostocalcin, Parathyroid Hormone, Total and Ionized calcium and Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), also will be measured. The assessment will be done at baseline, after treatment (12 weeks) and after 6 months as follow up. The data will be analyzed using repeated measures Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparison between pre-treatment and post treatment measurement intervals. One-way ANOVA is used to compare between each treatment interval in treatment groups at pre-test and post treatment measurement intervals. The level of significance is set at 0.05 for all tests.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a T-scores of ≤ #1.5, all patients received the same medical treatment for osteoporosis and the same average blood glucose level, sufficient ability to understand the nature and potential risks of the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmia, uncontrolled thyroid disease, cardiac pacemaker, tuberculosis, neuropsychiatric disorders (dementia, cerebrovascular disease, alcohol abuse, severe depression, panic disorder, bipolar disorder, or psychosis), and malignancy.

Treatment and study plan

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field

Other

PEMF was administered to the whole body for PEMF groups using a 1.8×0.6m mat 30 minutes/day, 3 times/week for 3 months.

exercise program

Other

The exercise training program included treadmill and aerobic exercises for hip and upper limb and performed for 50 minutes.

Pulsed High Laser Therapy

Other

High Laser was delivered with a total dose of energy of 3000 J was delivered in two treatment phases. The initial phase was performed with fast manual scanning at 510, 610, and 710 mJ/cm2 in three successive subphases and 500 J in each subphase for a total of 1500 J. The final phase was the same as the initial phase except that the scanning was slow. The average area for the upper thigh or lower back was 200 cm2 with an average fluency of 15 J/cm2 and the application time for each area was 18 min. HILT was applied using a HIRO 3 device (ASA, Arcugnano, Vicenza, Italy).

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline Bone Mineral Density at 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

    Bone Mineral Density was assessed by the DEXA in the lumbar spine, proximal femur and forearm region in g/cm2.

  2. Change from baseline Vitamin D levels at 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

    Vitamin D test is the most accurate way to measure how much vitamin D is in the body. Vitamin D in serum was measured as a standard procedure at the Department of Clinical Chemistry.

  3. Change from baseline Alkaline Phosphatase at 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

    Alkaline Phosphatase was estimated colorimetric end point and kinetic using fully automated analyzer Advia Centaur, according to enclosed pamphlet.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline Osteocalcin at 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

    Ostocalcin is a predictive marker for osteoprosis and bone fracture. Serum Osteocalcin was measured in serum samples using an ELISA Kits.

  2. Change from baseline Parathyroid Hormone at 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months post-intervention

    Parathyroid hormones (PTH) was measurement chemiluminescence immunoassays [QuiCkIntraOperativeTM intact PTH. The assay was performed on the Immuno- automated analyzer (DPC) at the Department of Clinical Chemistry at Um ALQURA University, Faculty of Applied Medical Science. The Roche intact-PTH test was assayed on an Elecsys-1010 immunoassay analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) with its "Stat-function.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Umm Al-Qura University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Full-Body Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Versus Pulsed High Intensity Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Patients With Osteopenia or Osteoporosis

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 31, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 31, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.