IKCU, Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Acil Tıp
Izmir, 35360, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT05557032
The final approach adopted in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines as defined by the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) is to minimize the time between chest compressions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Pulse and rhythm checks are recommended between chest compressions and it is stated that this period should not exceed 10 seconds.
All guidelines also state that in cases of low cardiac output or low blood pressure, even if electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythms can be obtained, pulse checks may still fail and an arterial pulse may not be felt during chest compressions. This difficulty in sensing the arterial pulse causes delays in the decision of cardiac arrest in the patient. For this reason, there are cases of cardiac arrest in which the initiation of CPR is delayed or not started at all.
The most common method for checking the pulse is manual palpation. However, since it is an operator-dependent method, it is affected by the experience of the healthcare personnel, the vital values of the patient, and anatomical differences. Therefore, more objective criteria are required to detect a pulse. A clinical study of the reliability of pulse checks showed that most healthcare professionals are unable to detect the presence or absence of a pulse. Another study showed that pulse alone is not sufficient to initiate CPR, and 50% of decisions to initiate CPR based on heart rate are incorrect. Therefore, more objective criteria have been sought to detect the presence of a pulse. For this purpose, evaluations were made regarding the presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide, cardiac echo, and organized rhythm.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–100 year
All sexes
Observational
Izmir, 35360, Turkey (Türkiye)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
pulse checks during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Time frame: 2 minute
Our aim is to compare the USG and manual methods in evaluating the presence of a pulse during CPR and to determine which method gives the most appropriate time and accuracy.
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Other
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Carotid Arteries in Pulse Control Using USG and Manual Palpation Methods in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03817892
Cardiac Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Caen, Normandy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06599073
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Loerenskog, Akershus, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05992454
Basic Cardiac Life Support, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05023616
Cardiopulmonary Arrest, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details