Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
Sheffield, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Alex Rothman
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT05825417
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the capacity of implantable/remote technology for early evaluation of drug therapies in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The main question it aims to answer is whether structured changes in clinical therapy will be detectable using implanted regulatory approved devices. Participants will will be implanted with approved medical devices and will enter into a study of approved drugs to assess physiology, activity and patient reported quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes. Researchers will compare two therapeutic strategies in each individual patient to see if the study design provides enough evidence to personalise drug treatment plans
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Sheffield, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
Location status: Recruiting
Alex Rothman
CONTACT
In this study, patients established on guideline recommended therapy will be implanted with devices and remote monitoring established. Patients will then enter into a 2x2 crossover study of approved drugs during which standard clinical investigations will be undertaken at baseline and maximal therapy on each drug. The cross-over design will provide multiple increases and decreases of drugs known to alter haemodynamics and 6MWT. The study is powered to detect improvement in right ventricular stroke volume measured by MRI from baseline to maximal therapy for each drug. It will then be established if changes in remote monitored measures provide an early indication of clinical efficacy when compared to the MRI, haemodynamics, NTproBNP and 6MWT made at 12-weeks. Remote measurement of haemodynamics during the two periods of de-escalation will inform understanding of physiology and inform clinical practice. The comparison of the two therapeutic strategies in individual patients in one study will facilitate novel clinical study designs and provide evidence for data-driven personalised medicine in the area.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
If Arm A - Up-titration to maximum tolerated dose followed by de-escalation If Arm B - Up-titration to maximum tolerated dose followed by observation, modification or transition at discretion of responsible care team where necessary.
Other names: Uptravi, oral prostacyclin IP receptor agonist (OPA)
If Arm A - Up-titration to maximum tolerated dose followed by de-escalation If Arm B - Up-titration to maximum tolerated dose followed by observation, modification or transition at discretion of responsible care team where necessary.
Other names: Adempas, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator (sGCS)
Implantation and remote monitoring established with patient initiated daily readings
Implantation and remote monitoring established with automated daily readings / downloads
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
This provides a robust, objective assessment of clinical efficacy which, if met, will mean that a change in therapy has provided a clinically meaningful change in physiology
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in TPR (Woods Units) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in mPAP (mmHg) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in CO (L/min) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in cardiac index (L/min/m^2) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in SV (mL) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change in HR (bpm) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
RVEF (%) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
RVESV (mL/m^2) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
RVEDV (mL/m^2) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
RVSV (mL) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
LVEF (%) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
LVESV (mL/m^2) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
LVEDV (mL/m^2) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
LVSV (mL) on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
LVSV flow on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change of QoL score on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy. This will be done using EmPHasis-10 questionnaire (10 questions using a 0 (poor) - 5 (good) scale)
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change of medication compliance score on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy. This will be done using PHoenix PRO questionnaire (10 questions using a 0 (poor) - 5 (good) scale)
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change of medication side effects on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy. This will be done using PHoenix Medication side effects questionnaires (4 Yes/No or Better/Worse style questions)
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change of depression symptoms on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy. This will be done using the GAD-2/7 questionnaire (2 screening questions to determine if symptoms present. If present, 7 additional questions to determine level of depression using a 0 (not at all) - 3 (nearly every day) scale)
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change of anxiety symptoms on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy. This will be done using the PHQ-2/9 questionnaire (2 screening questions to determine if symptoms present. If present, 9 additional questions to determine level of anxiety using a 0 (not at all) - 3 (nearly every day) scale)
Time frame: From baseline and area under the curve to 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Change on each therapy to determine clinical efficacy. Functional assessment of PAH will be made according to the WHO classification system: Class I - Patients with PAH without limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause increased dyspnoea or fatigue, chest pain, or near syncope / Class II - Patients with PAH resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. No discomfort at rest. Normal physical activity causes increased dyspnoea or fatigue, chest pain, or near syncope / Class III - Patients with PAH resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. There is no discomfort at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes increased dyspnoea or fatigue, chest pain, or near syncope / Class IV - Patients with PAH with inability to carry out any physical activity without discomfort. Indications of manifest right heart failure. Dyspnoea and/or fatigue may even be present at rest. Discomfort is increased by the least physical activity.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Other
A Multicentre Randomised Cross-over Trial of Disease Specific Therapy in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) Implanted With Pulmonary Artery Pressure and Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring Devices (CardioMEMS/ConfirmRx)
Acronym: PHoenix
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07613099
Acute Lung Injury, Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01712620
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07218029
Hypertension, Pulmonary, Lung Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07623525
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial Details