Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital)
Yuzhong, Chongqing Municipality, 400042, China
NCT Number: NCT07683390
Patients with suspected DD who met the Rome IV criteria were divided into the DD group and other types of constipation groups. The differences between the two groups were analyzed to explore the precise diagnostic scheme for DD.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–85 year
All sexes
Observational
Yuzhong, Chongqing Municipality, 400042, China
This study was conducted solely at the Army Specialized Medical Center and was a single-center, bidirectional cohort study. Patients with suspected dyssynergic defecation who visited the constipation specialty clinic of Daping Hospital were collected. After the patients signed the informed consent form, they were asked to fill out the questionnaire (general clinical data questionnaire, Wexner constipation rating scale, ODS rating scale, and constipation patient quality of life scale (PAC-QOL)). The baseline data of the patients (such as age, gender, symptoms, constipation scale scores, intestinal satisfaction scores, etc.) and the results of anorectal manometry, defecography, and perineal ultrasound were statistically analyzed. Patients meeting the Rome IV criteria were grouped through DFG, ARM, and pelvic floor ultrasound examination. The differences in clinical main symptoms, constipation scores, defecography, perineal ultrasound, etc. between the two groups were observed, and the roles and correlations of each parameter in diagnosis were analyzed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Analysis of inter-group differences
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Rectal emptying rate is defined as the reduction in rectal area from pre-evacuation to post-evacuation, expressed as a percentage of the pre-evacuation area, as assessed by defecography.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
the minimum value is 0,and maximum value is 31; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
the minimum value is 0,and maximum value is 30; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
the minimum value is 0,and maximum value is 112; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
the minimum value is 25,and maximum value is 100; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
the minimum value is 1,and maximum value is 7; a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Time frame: Baseline assessment
changes in anorectal angle during defecography
Time frame: Baseline assessment
anal canal diameter during straining on DFG
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Puborectalis syndrome indicated by the defecography diagnostic report.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Internal rectal prolapse indicated by the defecography diagnostic report.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Rectocele indicated by the defecography diagnostic report.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal Resting Pressure measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal Squeeze Pressure measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Rectal propulsive pressure measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Anal relaxation rate measured by High-resolution Anorectal Manometry during defecation
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Dyssynergic defecation(DD) reported by high-resolution anorectal manometry parameters, with diagnostic criteria of rectal pressure during straining >45mmHg and anal canal relaxation rate <20%.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
changes in anorectal angle during evacuation measured by Transperineal Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Changes in right puborectalis muscle thickness during defecation measured by Transperineal Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Changes in left puborectalis muscle thickness during defecation measured by Transperineal Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Puborectalis syndrome(PRS) indicated by the transperineal ultrasound diagnostic report
Third Military Medical University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07225803
Constipation, Dyssynergic Defecation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05771597
Digestive System Diseases, Dyssynergic Defecation
Augusta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details