Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02563353

PTH and Vibration in OSteoporosis Study

Objective:

This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in osteoporosis patients randomized to standard parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment alone or to standard PTH treatment and Whole-body vibration (WBV). PTH is an effective but expensive anabolic treatment for osteoporosis. WBV stimulates muscles and bones. A combined treatment might have synergistic or additive beneficial effects on bone, reducing fracture risk making treatment more effective and cost-effective. A beneficial effect on muscles and thereby falls risk of WBV may improve fracture risk even further.

If the results of this pilot study are promising then a strong case can be made for a large multi-centre RCT using strong endpoints including fractures and falls.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Odense University Hospital

Odense, 5000, Denmark

About this study

Study Objectives

  • To determine if WBV in addition to standard PTH treatment has a greater effect on bone mass in osteoporosis patients compared to standard PTH treatment alone.
  • To determine if WBV in addition to standard PTH treatment has a greater effect on bone microarchitecture in osteoporosis patients compared to standard PTH treatment alone, as assessed by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).
  • To determine if WBV in addition to standard PTH treatment has a greater effect on markers of bone formation and resorption in osteoporosis patients compared to standard PTH treatment alone.
  • To study the effects of WBV on muscle function and balance in osteoporosis
  • To assess the safety and adherence to WBV in osteoporotic patients

Study Design:

General Design This will be a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) in osteoporosis patients being started on standard PTH treatment according to Danish Osteoporosis guidelines. Participants will be randomized to standard PTH treatment alone or to standard PTH treatment and WBV.

Statistical Plan:

Sample Size Determination The inclusion of 32 participants (16 in both groups) would give the study 80% power to detect a clinically significant additional increase of 22% with WBV (assuming a 9% increase of BMD in the PTH alone group and 11% increase in the combined PTH+WBV group, and assuming a SD of the BMD increase of 2%. Allowing for a 20% dropout rate, the plan is to include 40 participants (20 in each group). From previous research on WBV by one of the investigators (TM), statistically significant differences were found in bone formation markers and in muscle strength at 3 months between the WBV and control groups with a sample size of 35. The number of participants in the latter pilot work is reassuringly consistent with the sample size calculations. The number needed to be included is far less (34%) than the actual number of patients treated with PTH in the recruiting departments in a similar time period last year.

Statistical Methods:

STATA/SPSS will be used for data analysis. For the primary endpoint (BMD at 12 months) the mean percentage changes in BMD between the two groups will be compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) provided the distribution is normal. For the other endpoints parametric tests will be used to assess differences in the two groups for normally distributed data and non-parametric tests for data not normally distributed.

The randomization will be done online in the data capture program Red Cap. There will be created a Data dictionary that contains detailed descriptions of each variable used by the registry, including the source of the variable, and normal ranges if relevant.

Information:

Participants will be recruited during their attendance at the outpatient clinics. At that time the subjects will be given a full explanation of the study as well as the patient information sheet and invited to participate in the study. At an interval of not less than 24 hours, patients will be invited to consent prior to starting their PTH treatment.

The information will be sufficient for subjects to make an informed decision about their participation in this study. The subject will complete and sign a consent form to indicate they are giving valid consent to participate in the trial.

Withdrawal of Subjects:

Patients who withdraw consent from participation in the trial will be withdrawn from the trial. This will not affect their standard medical management and not cause any adverse effect on the subject.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women starting PTH treatment for osteoporosis according to Danish Osteoporosis guidelines

Exclusion criteria

  • Women currently taking oral glucocorticoids
  • Women unable to give informed consent
  • Women unable to stand for 2 minutes at a time on the vibration platform
  • Women who have contraindications to WBV (e.g. joint prosthesis, pacemakers)

Treatment and study plan

Whole-Body Vibration

Other

Whole-body vibration on vibration platforms. 30-40 Hertz, from 2 mm (low) to 4 mm (high) amplitude,

1 minutes x 6 with 1 minute break between. 3 times a week.

Other names: vibration therapy

Teriparatide

Drug

Teriparatide, 20 microgram/day. 24 months of treatment.

Other names: PTH

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in the BMD, Bone Mineral Density of hip and spine region (Hologic DXA machine)

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 6, 12, 18, 24 months from baseline

    DXA scan of hip and spine regions, BMD (g/cm^2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in the Bone microarchitecture at the tibia

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline

    HRpQCT assesses parameters of bone microarchitecture at the tibia.

  2. Changes in the Bone microarchitecture at the radius

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline

    HRpQCT assesses parameters of bone microarchitecture at the radius.

  3. changes in muscle mass

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 12 and 24 months from baseline

    Full body DXA

  4. Changes from baseline in the markers of bone resorption

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months from baseline

    CTX, sclerostin

  5. Changes from baseline in the markers of bone formation

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months from baseline

    P1NP

  6. Changes in Muscle strength

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3,6,12,18 and 24 months from baseline

    Measurements of muscle strength (leg extensor power)

  7. Changes in handgrip strength

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3,6,12,18 and 24 months from baseline

    Measurements of muscle strength (handgrip strength)

  8. Changes in Balance

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3, 6 ,12, 18 and 24 months from baseline

    Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

  9. Adherence to WBV

    Time frame: During 2 years from the start of the treatment

    Self Reporting training log

  10. Changes in physical activity

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 12, and 24 months from baseline

    IPAQ short version

  11. Changes in quality of life

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 12, and 24 months from baseline

    EQ5D questionaire.

  12. Changes in basic mobility

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 3,6,12,18 and 24 months from baseline

    Time up and go test

  13. Changes in The Falls Efficacy Scale International

    Time frame: at the time the participants start treatment and in an interval as close as possible to after 12, and 24 months from baseline

    FES-I

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
  • Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
  • Odense Patient Data Explorative Network
  • Region of Southern Denmark
  • Sygehus Lillebaelt
  • University of Southern Denmark

Registry information

Official study title

PTH and Vibration in OSteoporosis (PaVOS) Study

Acronym: PaVOS

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Sep 30, 2015
Registry last updated
Sep 18, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.