Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
NCT Number: NCT04501445
Families of patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at increased risk for developing psychological symptoms that can last for months after the patient is discharged. These symptoms can have significant impact on both the patient and family member's quality of life.
The investigators have found that families of patients admitted to the Rush University Medical Center ICU during to the COVID-19 pandemic were more likely to develop clinically significant psychological symptoms than families of patients admitted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The investigators suspect that this finding is due in part to the hospital-wide no visitation policy that altered our standard communication practices and may have prevented families from being active participants in the patient's medical care.
The goals of this project are 1) to determine the prevalence of psychological disorders among families of COVID-19 patients after ICU discharge 2) to determine the characteristics of ICU care that were associated with the development of psychological disorders among family members and 3) to pilot a program in which families with psychological disorders after ICU discharge receive therapy from mental health professionals.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Part 1- Post-ICU discharge survey and Interview Upon enrollment in this post-ICU discharge follow-up study, the subject (surrogate of the ICU patient) will complete a survey dealing with the patient's course since Rush discharge
i. If at home, for how long? Is he/she receiving home health services?
Subjects will be asked to complete the 1) Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) questionnaire, 2) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and 3) Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) questionnaire.
Subjects will participate in a 30-minute phone interview with a member of the study team. The interviewer will review the subject's responses to the above surveys and ask follow-up questions. The interviewer will ask how the subject has been coping with any psychological symptoms (i.e. anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress)
The psychologist will describe different types of interventions for people coping psychological symptoms and assess the subject's interest in pursuing any of them.
Part 2 - Post-ICU psychological intervention Subjects with clinically significant psychologist symptoms based on either their survey or interview responses will be invited to participate in 6-week trauma-focused intervention with a psychologist.
The program will be brief and delivered online to test the acceptability and feasible of the program, and to gather a preliminary estimate of effect size. We will pilot a group-based intervention (n =3-5) online over Zoom and deliver the intervention across six sessions outlined below. Sessions will last 60-75 minutes depending on participant questions and discussion. Experiential exercises will be drawn from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, a related contemporary cognitive behavioral treatment (Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 2012). Some commentary of Viktor Frankl's (1985) work on meaning making will be made in group discussion. Activity scheduling worksheets from Martell, Dimijian and Herman-Dunn (2013) will be used for out of session homework.
We plan two phases for the study. The first phase, sessions 1-3, focus on introducing the model of behavioral activation and guide the participants to identify activities that will being pleasant, meaningful, or offer a sense of accomplishment and mastery. The first session aims to normalize diverse responses to health-related stress and loss by introducing the behavioral model of depression, and the rationale for behavioral activation. In the second session participants then clarify their values, so that they can begin scheduling pleasant and/or meaningful activities in the third session. These activities are tailored based on each participant's individuals goals, priorities and values. The second phase, sessions 4-6, aims to reinforce and sustain positive gains made via behavioral activation and pleasant activity scheduling. Session 4 offers suggestions for problem-solving ways to overcome unhelpful avoidance, a transdiagnostic vulnerability that sustains a number of emotional and psychiatric disorders. Session 5 offers suggestions for overcoming rumination including instruction in mindfulness, and attentional techniques that help participants attend to the outcomes and experiences of the pleasant activities they engage in. Session 6 concludes the program, and guides participants to consider plans to maintain commitment to pleasant activities.
Session 1 Psychoeducation Introductions. Question to group: Why are we here?
Session 2 Value Clarification Question to the group: How do we bring purpose into our living?
o "We do not ask life what the meaning of life is. Life asks us, what is the meaning of your life. And life demands our answer."
Session 3 Scheduling Activities Question to group: What does it mean to be committed?
Session 4 Overcoming Avoidance What do we do with fear?
Session 5 Working with thoughts Question to the group: How do we prevent going on autopilot so we stay focused on what matters?
Prior to beginning the intervention and at the completion of the intervention, surrogates will complete the 1) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and 2) Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) questionnaire.
At the completion of the intervention, subjects will participate in another 30-minute phone interview with a study investigator. The study investigator will review the subject's responses to the above surveys and ask follow-up questions. The study investigator will ask how the subject has been coping with any psychological symptoms (i.e. anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress).
All interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed. Two members study staff will review the transcriptions and use thematic content analysis to determine the types of psychological symptoms that are present and the reason(s) they may be present.
When analyzing subject responses, the investigators will account for the following variables
Statistical Analysis The investigators expect ~100 subjects to meet inclusion criteria. The investigators expect ~70-100 to complete Part 1 (Post-ICU discharge survey and Interview). The investigators will determine the prevalence of psychological symptoms and opinions on ICU care by reviewing survey responses and interview recordings. The investigators expect ~30 to complete Part 2 (Post-ICU discharge survey and Interview). The investigators compare pre- to post-intervention survey responses for each subject using a paired t-test. Part 2 will be considered a pilot study. The investigators will use the results to plan a future, adequately powered study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The summary was organized as follows for each of the most important ICU problems: 1) Description of the problem, 2) Ways the ICU team is addressing the problem i.e. consultations, diagnostic tests, and treatments. 3) An assessment of whether the problem is improving or worsening.
Time frame: Measured once upon enrollment
Score on Impact of Events Scale Revised (IES-R) questionnaire. 22 questions. Score 0-88 with higher scores indicating more stress.
Time frame: Measured once upon enrollment
Score on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Total score 0-21 for anxiety (7 questions) and 0-21 for depression (7 questions). Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Time frame: Measured once upon enrollment
Score on the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) questionnaire. 14 questions. Total score range 14-56 with lower scores indicating better satisfaction.
Time frame: Measured before behavioral intervention (6-12 weeks after enrollment)
IES-R score before intervention
The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88) with higher scores indicative of more severe PTSD
Time frame: Measured after behavioral intervention (12-24 weeks after enrollment)
IES-R after intervention
The IES-R yields a total score (ranging from 0 to 88) with higher scores indicative of more severe PTSD
Time frame: Measured before behavioral intervention (6-12 weeks after enrollment)
Score on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Total score 0-21 for anxiety (7 questions) and 0-21 for depression (7 questions). Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Time frame: Measured after behavioral intervention (12-24 weeks after enrollment)
Score on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Total score 0-21 for anxiety (7 questions) and 0-21 for depression (7 questions). Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Time frame: Measured once upon enrollment
Qualitative analysis of phone interview to determine the presence and reason(s) for psychological symptoms
Time frame: Measured after behavioral intervention (12-24 weeks after enrollment)
Qualitative analysis of phone interview to determine the presence and reason(s) for psychological symptoms
Rush University Medical Center
Other
Relieving the Burden of Psychological Symptoms Among Families of Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04476914
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05280691
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT05461521
Family Members, Mental Disorders
Angoulême, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04430049
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France
View Trial Details