Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03481127

Psychological Services Integration in Gynecological Oncology Clinics

The purpose of this study is to understand the feasibility and impact of integrated psychological care in outpatient gynecologic oncology clinics with the goal of creating a new standard of care. The investigators propose an intervention study comparing patient-centered outcomes (assessed by surveys) between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care. The investigators' objectives are to learn about the process of integration of psychological care directly into outpatient gynecologic oncology clinics and the impact of such integration on patients' well-being, presentation of symptoms, psychological functioning, coping mechanisms, awareness of support services offered, and perception of quality of care. As this is a feasibility study, aims are focused on assessing patient willingness for psychological intervention in the medical office, provider willingness to have psychologist present in clinic, and impact of psychological intervention. With such data to warrant further integration and time of psychologists in medical clinics, next steps for immediate and long-term projects may include focus on high risk populations, specific disease sites, additional provider clinics, more psychologist time spent in gynecological oncology clinics, and effectiveness of interventions with higher power. The investigators hope the results will serve as preliminary data for an integrated psychosocial care model that can be implemented in other oncology clinics.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Gynecologic Oncology Patient

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Primary location

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Scheduled for an appointment in a gynecologic oncology clinic at the Siteman Cancer Center at the Center for Advanced Medicine or the Women's Tumor Clinic at the Center for Outpatient Health at Barnes-Jewish Hospital
  • Patients may or may not have a cancer diagnosis.
  • All gynecologic cancer types, histologic grades, primary or recurrent disease.
  • Patients actively undergoing treatment or close observation
  • Pregnant or lactating patients
  • Able to speak and read English
  • Able to consent

Inclusion criteria

(correlative studies only) -Patients who are undergoing pre-operative work-up for evaluation of an adnexal mass by a Washington University gynecologic oncologist.

Exclusion criteria

-Impaired by a psychiatric or cognitive disorder that limits their ability to give consent or communicate with their medical providers about symptoms (as determined by the patient's medical team)

Exclusion criteria

(correlative studies only)

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Treatment within the past month with antidepressant medications that affect serotonin physiology
  • Specific histology: low malignant potential tumors, non-epithelial cancer histology.
  • Previous cancer diagnosis within the past five years or recurrent cancer
  • Regular steroid use in the last month
  • Presence of comorbidities with known effects on the immune system (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis), congestive heart failure, pregnancy, or stroke within the past six months
  • Major surgery in the past month.

Treatment and study plan

Integrated psychological care

Behavioral

Additional possible strategies used may include supportive or validating interventions, increasing/introducing/reinforcing coping strategies, psychoeducation; distress tolerance skills; brief cognitive behavioral therapy; cognitive restructuring; activity scheduling; acceptance; and relaxation/mindfulness.

Surveys

Other
  • NCCN Distress Thermometer
  • PROMIS Depression & Anxiety
  • Quality of Life (SF-12)
  • Brief COPE
  • Patient awareness and satisfaction survey

Blood draw

Procedure
  • For patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cysts
  • Optional
  • Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

Fresh tissue from ovary

Procedure
  • For patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cysts
  • Optional
  • At time of standard of care surgery

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of integrating psychosocial care by a trained psychologist into gynecologic cancer outpatient clinics as measured by patient enrollment

    Time frame: Completion of patient enrollment (approximately 12 months)

    -Willingness to participate with integrated care as quantified by proportion of enrolled patients from the number of approached eligible patients

Secondary outcomes

  1. Provider willingness to have a psychologist present

    Time frame: 6 months after start of study enrollment

    -5 item survey about willingness to have psychologist present in clinic

  2. Differences in clinic visit duration with and without a psychologist present

    Time frame: Day 1

    -Clinic visit duration is defined as the time from check-in to patient discharge

  3. Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient distress between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • NCCN Distress Thermometer: picture of thermometer that states to circle the number that best describes how much distress has been experienced in the past week (10=extreme distress and 0=no distress)
    • Next section contains categories of Practical Problems, Family Problems, Emotional Problems, Physical Problems, Spiritual/religious concerns - participant is to mark yes or no to indicate if they have had problems in the past week
    • The distress thermometer score of 0-10 is recorded. The problem areas endorsements are tallied within each problem area.

  4. Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient depression between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • PROMIS Depression & Anxiety - asks participant in the last 7 days if they have felt worthless, helpless, depressed, hopeless, fearful, lack of focus, worrying, and uneasy. Check box choices are never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always
    • Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question. Never = 1, rarely = 2, sometimes = 3, often =4, always = 5. Points are added to raw score. Raw score is converted to t-score via short form conversion table.

  5. Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient anxiety between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • PROMIS Depression & Anxiety - asks participant in the last 7 days if they have felt worthless, helpless, depressed, hopeless, fearful, lack of focus, worrying, and uneasy. Check box choices are never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always
    • Point values are as follows: never =1, rarely, rarely = 2, sometimes = 3, often =4, always = 5. Points are added to raw score. Raw score is converted to t-score via short form conversion table.

  6. Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient quality of life between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • Quality of life (SF-12): 12 item survey
    • Scores are recoded to give numerical value, with some items reverse scored. Scoring is broken down into mental health and physical health subscale scores.

  7. Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient coping mechanisms between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • Brief COPE: 28 item survey with answers ranging from 1=I haven't been doing this at all to 4=I've been doing this a lot
    • Scores are on tallied based on answers to 4 point likert scale. No reverse scoring. There are 14 subscales with two questions each.

  8. Difference in psychological correlates of perception of psychological care as measured by patient perception of Siteman Cancer Center being highly focused on their wellbeing between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • 4 item survey
    • Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question.
    • 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree

  9. Difference in psychological correlates of awareness of psychological care as measured by awareness of support services offered between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care

    Time frame: Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment

    • 4 item survey
    • Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question.
    • 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine

Other

Collaborators

  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Implementation and Evaluation of Psychological Services Integration in Gynecological Oncology Clinics

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.