Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04110522

Psoriatic Arthritis D2P Screening

The overarching goal of this study is to develop a direct-to-patient screening approach that will improve early Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) detection in patients with psoriasis. Previously developed screening questionnaires were intended for use in the setting of a doctor's office to assist providers with referral decisions. However, these screening questionnaires are infrequently used in routine practice because of limitations with time and resources. The study will aim to develop a practical screening strategy that does not require involvement from dermatologists (or other non-rheumatology providers) and can systematically reach a broad range of psoriasis patients, including patients not attending dermatology clinics. The researchers hypothesize that disseminating questionnaires directly to patients outside of a clinic setting (direct-to-patient approach) will educate patients about their PsA risk and improve early PsA diagnoses.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Electronic medical record (EMR) systems will be used to identify psoriasis patients without a PsA diagnosis. Patients will be randomized to receive a PsA screening questionnaire (intervention group) or not receive a questionnaire (control group). Rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses will be compared between the groups, using EMRs to longitudinally track outcomes.

Intervention group patients who through the completion of the PsA Screening questionnaire positively self-screen for an elevated PsA risk will either be randomly invited to directly access a rheumatology appointment or instructed to talk with their doctor about a rheumatology referral. We will compare rates of rheumatologic evaluations and new PsA diagnoses between these groups to identify the best method for accessing rheumatology appointments.

To determine if PsA patients diagnosed after receiving a screening questionnaire differ from patients diagnosed via usual care; investigators will examine disease duration, severity, and comorbidities in patients receiving and not receiving the screening questionnaire.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code diagnosis of psoriasis but without a confirmed diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis prior to study initiation
  • Be age 18 or older
  • Be geographically located within a reasonable proximity to the Rheumatology study site

Exclusion criteria

  • Have psoriasis and a confirmed diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis made or confirmed by a rheumatologist

Treatment and study plan

Direct to patient PsA Screening Questionnaire

Other

Patients randomized to an intervention group will be asked to complete and score the 5-item Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (PEST) questionnaire. Those patients with an elevated score (PEST ≥3 out of 5) will be advised to complete a rheumatologic evaluation for PsA.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients with a new PsA diagnosis

    Time frame: 6 months

    The percentage of psoriasis patients with a new diagnosis of PsA will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)

  2. Symptom duration

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) will be compared to the average duration of baseline symptoms prior to PsA diagnosis in the Control Arm

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation

    Time frame: 6 months

    The percentage of psoriasis patients who complete a rheumatologic evaluation will be compared between the Experimental Arms and the Control Arm, and compared between the two Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral)

  2. Time to initial PsA diagnosis after questionnaire dissemination

    Time frame: 6 months

    The average time to PsA diagnosis after dissemination of the questionnaire in the Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist arm compared to the Intervention with Standard of Care Referral Arm

  3. Time to rheumatologic evaluation after questionnaire dissemination

    Time frame: 6 months

    The average time to rheumatologic evaluation after dissemination of the questionnaire in the Intervention with Direct Access to Rheumatologist arm compared to the Intervention with Standard of Care Referral Arm

  4. Severity of PsA Disability

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average work disability in PsA, as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire score will be compared between the Experimental ams (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm

  5. Physical function level in PsA

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average physical function level in PsA, as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) questionnaire score will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

  6. Severity of PsA radiographic damage

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average number of psoriatic arthritis inflammatory changes per rheumatology provider's judgement after review of all relevant available imaging data using scale of yes/no/unsure will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

  7. PsA Activity by Joint Count

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average number of swollen/tender joints in PsA using the 66/68 joint count assessment by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

  8. PsA Activity by Enthesitis

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average number of joint insertions with enthesitis in PsA as determined by the Leeds enthesitis index as assessed by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

  9. PsA Activity by Dactilitis Count

    Time frame: 6 months

    Average number of digits with dactylitis in PsA using a dactylitis count (yes/no for each finger or toe) as assessed by rheumatology provider physical exam will be compared between the Experimental Arms (intervention with direct access to rheumatologist and intervention with standard of care referral) and the Control Arm.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Jessica Walsh

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Accelerating Psoriatic Arthritis Detection in Patients With Psoriasis: Direct-to-patient Administration of Screening Questionnaires (D2P Screening)

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Oct 1, 2019
Registry last updated
May 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.