PSMA-1007 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan
Diagnostic TestAdditional staging PET scan prior to focal therapy to focal therapy.
NCT Number: NCT06003556
The goal of this phase 2 multicenter randomized controlled trial is to study the accuracy of second generation prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET; utilizing 18F-PSMA-1007) compared to standard of care multiparametric MRI and MRI targeted-prostate biopsy for staging in patients diagnosed with unilateral prostate cancer who are eligible for focal therapy.
The main question it aims to answer is:
Can PSMA PET improve diagnostic accuracy for the primary staging of Prostate Cancer for patients undergoing focal therapy thereby reducing residual and recurrence disease?
Participants who are eligible by current standard of care diagnostic workup will undergo 1:1 randomization to PSMA PET scan or no further imaging. Those diagnosed with bilateral disease by PSMA PET will be ineligible for focal therapy and be referred for radical therapy. Men with unilateral disease on PSMA PET and those randomized to no further imaging will then undergo focal therapy. All men undergoing focal therapy will receive PSMA PET, MRI, and combined targeted and systematic biopsy 12 months after ablation. The primary outcome will be the detection of Gleason Grade Group 2 or higher prostate cancer in men 12 months after hemigland ablation.
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2
Prostate Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Focal therapy is emerging as a new treatment strategy for appropriately selected men with localized prostate cancer. Focal therapy (also called partial gland ablation) is the concept of treating only where the tumor is believed to be located within the prostate, leaving normal healthy regions of the prostate untreated. Thus, focal therapy minimizes treatment side effects such as erectile dysfunction and incontinence, while providing good cancer control.
The foundation of performing oncologically sound partial gland ablation is possessing a high degree of diagnostic certainty that the tumor is limited to the region that is being treated and is not unknowingly present elsewhere in the gland. However, this is currently a major diagnostic challenge. The current diagnostic strategy for work-up of a patient for focal therapy is based on a pre-operative multiparametric MRI and combined targeted and systematic prostate biopsy showing intermediate risk prostate cancer localized to only one side of the prostate gland. This combination has been shown to accurately diagnose the final tumor grade in 96.5% of men. However, whole mount pathology data after radical prostatectomy shows that over 50% of cases that would pre-operatively have been deemed appropriate for focal therapy, which is a unilateral treatment, in fact harbour bilateral disease, which would mean that contralateral tumor would be inadvertently left untreated. Similarly, our group has shown that of the 35% of men who were found to have residual tumor after hemigland ablation of their prostate for unilateral disease, two-thirds of residual tumors were identified on the side contralateral to the ablative treatment. Therefore, our current gold standard pre-operative imaging and biopsy techniques are under staging many men who are undergoing focal therapy and a new paradigm is required to advance focal ablative treatments.
PSMA PET is a new imaging technique that uses a radioligand that binds to prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA is expressed at high levels in prostate cancer and the degree of expression correlates proportionately with tumor grade. A second generation PSMA PET radioligand, called 18F-PSMA-1007, has been used extensively at our site and possesses the key attributes of minimal urinary excretion, high resolution, and a half-life that as Gallium based radioligands. This makes 18F-PSMA-1007 an excellent candidate for improving the intraprostatic diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer localization in patients considering focal therapy as a treatment option.
Primary outcome:
The primary outcome is the detection of any clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as greater than or equal to Gleason Grade Group 2) at MRI-guided combined targeted and systematic biopsy 12 months after hemigland ablation.
Secondary outcomes:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Additional staging PET scan prior to focal therapy to focal therapy.
Time frame: 12 months after hemigland ablation.
Detection of any clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as greater than or equal to Gleason Grade Group 2) at MRI-guided combined targeted and systematic biopsy
Time frame: Prior to hemigland ablation - at study enrollment
The number of men found to have bilateral disease on PSMA PET prior to hemi-gland ablation
Time frame: 12 months after hemigland ablation.
The number of men found to have bilateral disease on PSMA PET after hemi-gland ablation
Time frame: 12 months after hemigland ablation.
The rate of contralateral Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater prostate cancer at time of biopsy
Time frame: Through study completion, expected within 1 year of randomization
The rate of contralateral Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater prostate cancer at final pathology in men undergoing radical prostatectomy after PSMA PET detected bilateral disease
Time frame: 5 years after hemigland ablation
5-year failure free survival defined as freedom from radical or systematic therapies, metastasis, prostate cancer specific and overall survivals.
Time frame: Immediately after the imaging
Number of patients with Side effects of PSMA PET imaging
Time frame: 12 months after hemigland ablation
Comparison of the direct health care system costs incurred by each patient in both trials arms at the 1 year mark after hemigland ablation. Health system resource utilisation data will be captured using the administrative data infrastructures of the health care systems hosting the study centres, combined with data from the study clinical case report form. Unit costs for all resources will be obtained from CIHI and health system specific cost databases.
Time frame: Through Study Completion, completion by end of study at 5 year mark
Comparison of the direct health care system costs incurred by each patient in both trials arms at the 5 year mark after hemigland ablation at the time of study completion. Health system resource utilisation data will be captured using the administrative data infrastructures of the health care systems hosting the study centres, combined with data from the study clinical case report form. Unit costs for all resources will be obtained from CIHI and health system specific cost databases.
Time frame: Through Study Completion, completion by end of study at 5 year mark. Every 3 months for first year and every 6months-1 year after
The EPIC-26 is a short form questionnaire designed to measure Quality of Life (QOL) issues in patients with prostate cancer. Response options for each EPIC item form a Likert scale, and multi-item scale scores are transformed linearly to a 0-100 scale with higher scores representing better Health Related QOL.
Time frame: Through Study Completion, completion by end of study at 5 year mark. Every 3 months for first year and every 6months-1 year after
The AUA Symptom Score evaluates impact and severity of urinary symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The AUA Symptom Score ranges from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Time frame: Through Study Completion, completion by end of study at 5 year mark. Every 3 months for first year and every 6months-1 year after
The IIEF-5 is a short form version of a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in men. THE IIEF-5 scale ranges from 5-25 with a higher score indicating less severe symptoms.
Time frame: Through Study Completion, completion by end of study at 5 year mark. Every 3 months for first year and every 6months-1 year after
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a self-assessed, health-related, quality of life questionnaire that measures quality of life on a 5-component scale including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The questionnaire can be used to derive a summary index score, which ranges from 0.000 (death) to 1.000 (perfect health).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Alberta
Other
PSMA-Guided Ablation of the Prostate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: P-GAP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05751434
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07455903
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02526368
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07054346
Disease, Genital Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details