Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03429075

Psilocybin vs Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Comparative Mechanisms

This is a randomised double-blind clinical trial. The aim is to compare the efficacy and mechanisms of action of psilocybin, the primary psychoactive substance in 'magic mushrooms', with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Imperial College Hammersmith campus

London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Major depressive disorder (DSM-IV)
  • Depression of moderate to severe degree (17+ on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)).
  • No Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) contraindications
  • No SSRI contraindications
  • Has a general practitioner (GP) or other mental healthcare professional who can confirm diagnosis
  • 18-80 years of age
  • Males and females
  • Sufficiently competent with English language

Key exclusion criteria:

  • Current or previously diagnosed psychotic disorder
  • Immediate family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder
  • Medically significant condition rendering unsuitability for the study (e.g., diabetes, epilepsy, severe cardiovascular disease, hepatic or renal failure e.g. creatine clearance:renal clearance (CLRC) < 30 ml/min etc.)
  • History of serious suicide attempts requiring hospitalisation.
  • Significant history of mania (determined by study psychiatrist and medical records)
  • Psychiatric condition judged to be incompatible with establishment of rapport with therapy team and/or safe exposure to psilocybin, e.g. borderline personality disorder
  • Blood or needle phobia
  • Positive pregnancy test at screening or during the study, women who are planning a pregnancy and/or women who are nursing/breastfeeding.
  • Participants who do not agree to use an acceptable contraceptive method throughout their participation in study.
  • Current drug or alcohol dependence
  • No email access
  • Use of contraindicated medication
  • Patients presenting with abnormal QT interval prolongation at screening or with a history of this (QTc at screening above 440ms for men and above 470ms for women)

Treatment and study plan

Psilocybin + Placebo

Drug

Multiple dosing days psilocybin vs 6 weeks of daily placebo

Psilocybin + Escitalopram

Drug

Multiple dosing days psilocybin vs 6 weeks of daily escitalopram

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change of the BOLD Signal

    Time frame: Baseline measure vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing

    Patients were tested with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain brain responses to emotional faces before and after the treatment. The 2 values of BOLD signal (before and after exposure to emotional faces) were used to estimate a percentage value per patient and then these were used to estimated a group percentage change.

  2. Change in QIDS-16: Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (QIDS-16)

    Time frame: Baseline vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing

    Change in QIDS-16 (self-rated measure of depressive symptoms). Scale is composed of 16 items that correlate with the 9 Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) symptom criteria for depression. Each response is graded 0-4 (none-severe symptoms). Questions 1-4 concern sleep disturbances, Question 5 addresses sad mood, Questions 6-9 appetite/weight, Question 10 concentration, Question 11 self-criticism, Question 12 suicidal ideation, Question 13 interest, Q14 energy/fatigue and Questions 15-16 psychomotor agitation/retardation. All questions that address the same topic are grouped and only the highest score from each group is summed up together with the other questions in order to produce a total score. Scores can range from 0-27 and depression severity is graded based on the total score in the following way: 1-5 = No depression 6-10 = Mild depression 11-15 = Moderate depression 16-20 = Severe depression 21-27 = Very severe depression

    Lower score =better outcome (less depression)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17)

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

    HAMD-17: clinician rated Hamilton Depression Scale of depression severity. Range of scores: 0-52: where 0-7 is normal, 8-16 is mild, 17-23 is moderate, >23 is severe.

    A threshold score of 17 is the entry: a score of 17 or higher indicated moderate-severe depression and was a requirement for entry into this trial at the screening point. This baseline does not refer to the screening point, it refers to the HAMD conducted 7-10 days before psilocybin dosing.

    A higher decrease in the HAMD (larger negative change score) is a better outcome.

  2. Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA)

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

    BDI-IA: patient-rated Beck Depression Inventory, depressive symptomatology scale. Higher score = worse depression. The total score range is 0-63: where 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe

    Higher negative score = greater decrease in depression scores 6 weeks after each treatment arm = better outcome.

  3. Change in MADRS

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

    MADRS - Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, clinician-rated measure of depression. This scale is clinician-rated and consists of 10 items; each item is rated on a 0-6 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 60 points, with higher scores indicative of greater depressive symptomology.36 The MADRS scoring instructions indicate that a total score ranging from 0 to 6 indicates that the patient is in the normal range (no depression), a score ranging from 7 to 19 indicates "mild depression," 20 to 34 indicates "moderate depression," a score of 35 and greater indicates "severe depression," and a total score of 60 or greater indicates "very severe depression."

    A higher decrease in the MADRS (larger negative change score) is a better outcome.

  4. Number of Patients Who "Responded": Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-16) Response at 6 Weeks

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

    Number of patients who "responded" on the QIDS-16 scale (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-rated). "Response" is defined by a decrease in QIDS score of 50% from baseline.

    Higher number of patients who responded = better outcome for treatment arm.

  5. Number of Patients Who "Remitted": QIDS-16 Remission Rate

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

    Number of patients who "remitted" on the QIDS-16 scale (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-rated). "Remission" is defined by having a QIDS score below 5 at the 6 week point = no depression.

    Higher remission rate = better outcome (less depressed patients after treatment)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London

Other

Collaborators

  • Alexander Mosely Charitable Trust

Registry information

Acronym: Psilodep-RCT

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
Registry last updated
Oct 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.