Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04350827

PRP vs PRP Plus IGF for Patellar Tendinosis

The purpose of this study is to compare two different platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for patellar tendinosis.

Aim: To perform a randomized, double blinded study comparing the clinical effect of PRP versus PRP + concentrated insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in patients with patellar tendinosis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Ohio State University Sports Medicine Center

Columbus, Ohio, 43221, United States

About this study

Introduction/Background:

Patellar tendinosis is a frustrating ailment commonly encountered in sports medicine. Treating this condition continues to be a significant challenge for sports medicine physicians. The tendinosis lesion is characterized by collagen disorganization and increased ground substance. One method of treating this problem is using platelet rich plasma (PRP), which is a concentration of platelets from the patient's own blood that provides a high dose of growth factors aimed at stimulating tendon healing. These injections have been used extensively to treat many tendon disorders including patellar tendinosis. Several studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of using PRP to treat patellar tendinosis.

One growth factor that is known to be helpful in tendon healing is insulin-like growth factor (IGF). However, IGF is not found in PRP but rather in the free plasma that is spun off during the PRP processing. This free plasma or platelet poor plasma (PPP) is typically discarded but it is a known source of IGF. We have shown that concentrating PPP in the FDA cleared Plasmax device yields an increased concentration of insulin-like growth factor (IGF). Local IGF injections into the patellar tendon have demonstrated improved tendon healing, but the effect on clinical outcomes has never been studied in a controlled fashion.

Research Design: Double blinded randomized comparative trial.

Detailed Study Procedures: 38 patients will be randomly assigned to a treatment arm. 19 patients will receive platelet rich plasma (PRP) and 19 patients will receive PRP plus concentrated IGF. Patient will be blinded to their treatment, but treatment team will not. PRP will be prepared according to standard sterile procedures out of view of the patient to ensure patients are adequately blinded. The injecting physician will not be blinded to randomization scheme.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • >6 weeks of symptomatic patellar tendinosis
  • unilateral or bilateral
  • 18 yrs of age or older
  • active in sport and exercise at least 3x / week
  • able to take time away from sport (for healing and rehabilitation phase after procedure)
  • failed at least 6 weeks of guided rehabilitation (under the supervision of either a certified athletic trainer or physical therapist)
  • minimum Tegner activity level of 4

Exclusion criteria

  • Steroid injection in target knee in the last 3 months
  • PRP in the target knee in the last 6 months
  • No other cellular treatments in index knee (bone marrow, amniotic suspensions) last 1 year
  • Participation in any experimental device or drug study within 1 year before screening visit
  • Oral or IM steroids for last 3 months
  • Dry needling of patellar tendon in last 6 months

Treatment and study plan

Platelet rich plasma

Device

Platelet rich plasma injection into patellar tendon

Platelet Rich Plasma plus IGF

Device

Platelet rich plasma plus IGF injection into patellar tendon

Primary outcomes

  1. Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-patellar Tendon (VISA-P)

    Time frame: 6 months

    Victorian Institute of sport assessment scale for patellar tendinopathy [VISA-P] is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 8 items; 6 are used to evaluate pain levels or disability in daily activities and specific functional tests and 2 provide information regarding ability to play sport. The maximum score possible is 100 points and represents an asymptomatic athlete who can fully engage in sports. The theoretical minimum is 0 points.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale-Pain

    Time frame: 6 months

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be').

  2. Tegner Activity Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

    The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that grads activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 athlete participating in competitive sports.

  3. Blazina Classification

    Time frame: 6 months

    Classification scale for functional limitations associated with patellar tendinitis. Stage 1: Pain after sports activity, Stage 2: Pain at the beginning of sports activity, disappearing with warm-up and sometimes reappearing with fatigue, Stage 3: Pain at rest and during activity; inability to participate in sports, Stage 4: Rupture of the patellar tendon

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ohio State University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Platelet-rich Plasma Plus Concentrated Insulin-like Growth Factor for Patellar Tendinosis: a Randomized Comparative Trial

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 17, 2020
Registry last updated
Oct 30, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.