Department of Maxillofacial Surgery
Kielce, Poland
NCT Number: NCT06530745
This clinical trial aims to compare the multidirectional mandibular mobility following the treatment of TMJ disorders with same-protocol intra-articular injections of PRP and HA. It is questioned whether there is direct clinical evidence of the superiority of PRP or HA in the injection treatment of TMJ disorders.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Kielce, Poland
This study was designed as a two-arm equal-allocation clinical trial with a non-concurrent active treatment control. The study group consisted of consecutive patients receiving PRP injections into the TMJ cavities. The control group consisted of the same number of patients who received HA according to the same protocol. Controls were recruited consecutively, men and women separately, to maintain a consistent male-to-female ratio. The main condition for recruitment was the diagnosis of TMJ pain by a specialist in orthodontics or dental prosthetics and, on this basis, a referral for injection treatment. TMJ pain was diagnosed under the ICOP 2020 guidelines. The treatment was performed at the Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic in Kielce, Poland. The study group received PRP from peripheral venous blood of the elbow bend centrifuged at 160 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes with iFuge D06 (Neuation Technologies Pvt. Ltd, Gujarat, India). The control group received 2% hyaluronic acid Synocrom Forte (Croma-Pharma GmbH, Leobendorf, Austria). In both groups, 0.4 mL of the solution was injected per joint.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
2% hyaluronic acid Synocrom Forte (Croma-Pharma GmbH, Leobendorf, Austria) injection
PRP from peripheral venous blood of the elbow bend centrifuged at 160 revolutions per minute for 5 minutes with iFuge D06 (Neuation Technologies Pvt. Ltd, Gujarat, India) injection
Time frame: 0 - 6 months
Range of mandibular abduction between anthropometric points Incision superius (Is) and Incision inferius (Ii)
Time frame: 0 - 6 months
Range of mandibular abduction between anthropometric points Incision superius (Is) and Incision inferius (Ii)
Time frame: 0 - 6 months
Range of mandibular abduction between anthropometric points Incision superius (Is) and Incision inferius (Ii)
Time frame: 0 - 6 months
Range of mandibular abduction between anthropometric points Incision superius (Is) and Incision inferius (Ii)
Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Kielce, Poland
Other
Quintuple Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Improves and Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Does Not Affect Mandibular Mobility in Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Disorders: A Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05068908
Chronic Pain, Craniomandibular Disorders
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05989217
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT05883982
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Kielce, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT06134310
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details