San Salvatore Hospital
L’Aquila, Abruzzo, 67100, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07255547
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if PRP and adipose-derived stem cells (AD-SVF) enhance healing after knee microfracture for chondral lesions. It will also learn about the safety of the procedure. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do PRP and AD-SVF get better results than PRP alone in patients undergoing arthroscopic microfracture for knee monocompartmental cartilage injuries? What medical problems do participants have when taking drug ABC? Researchers will compare PRP + AD-SVF to PRP alone to see if PRP + AD-SVF work better to treat knee cartilage injuries.
Participants will:
Undergo knee microfracture and biologics injections at the end of the arthroscopic procedure (PRP+AD-SVF vs PRP).
Visit the clinic for checkups and tests at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months post-treatment, and then annually.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
L’Aquila, Abruzzo, 67100, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All patients underwent an arthroscopic procedure (that further confirmed the preoperative diagnosis; i.e. monocompartmental chondral lesion - Outerbridge grade IV) including a concomitant bone marrow stimulation technique (microfracture). According to the technique described by Steadman, the cartilaginous lesion underwent preliminary debridement to remove the damaged cartilage and form a stable edge of healthy tissue and subsequent microfracture with an arthroscopic pick to stimulate the subchondral unit regenerative response.
Other names: knee arthroscopy, Steadman microfracture
After bone marrow stimulation technique, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms (allocation ratio 1:1). 40 patients underwent PRP injection while the other 40 underwent PRP + AD-SVF injections.
Other names: PRP injection
After bone marrow stimulation technique, patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms (allocation ratio 1:1). 40 patients underwent PRP injection while the other 40 underwent PRP + AD-SVF injections.
Time frame: From preoperatively (baseline) until the end of the study, up to 60 months.
Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score is a self-administered questionnaire and assesses five outcomes: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (No problems) to 4 (Extreme problems) and each of the five scores is calculated as the sum of the items included. The resulting scores are then transformed to a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems. The scores on this scale represent the percentage of the total possible score that the person achieved.
Time frame: From preoperatively (baseline) until the end of the study, up to 60 months.
Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Time frame: Until the end of the study, up to 60 months.
Adverse events such as knee swelling and pain with longer recovery time
Time frame: From preoperatively (baseline) to the end of the study, up to 60 months.
Overall physical and mental health-related quality of life was assessed with the 12-item Short Form Survey (SF-12). The SF-12 was constructed using questions drawn from each of the 8 dimensions of the MOS 36 item Short Form Survey (SF-36). It is designed to have similar performance to the SF-36, while taking less time to complete.Two summary scores are reported from the SF-12 - a mental component score (MCS-12) and a physical component score (PCS-12).
Additionally, the IKDC questionnaire was used to measure knee symptoms, functional limitations, and sports activity. An ordinal scoring system is used to assign a score of 0 to responses that signify the lowest level of function or the highest level of symptoms for each item. The IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form is graded by adding the results of each item's scores, and then converting the result to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
Università degli Studi dell'Aquila
Other
Arthrosocpic Treatment of Knee Chondral Lesions: Clinical, MRI and Histologic Comparison Between the Use of PRP vs ADSCs in Addition to Marrow Stimulation Techniques
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01282034
Knee Chondral Lesion, Knee Osteochondral Lesion
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT03027440
Fractures, Bone, Fractures, Stress
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05367505
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Bad Kreuznach, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07609849
Fractures, Bone, Fractures, Stress
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details