Proximal Row Carpectomy
ProcedureExcision of the proximal carpal row - the scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum
NCT Number: NCT04260165
Study purpose is to compare the outcome after proximal row carpectomy (PRC) vs four-corner fusion (FCA) for SLAC/SNAC II-III type osteoarthritis (OA) in a double-blinded randomized controlled study setting.
Patients with radiologically and clinically confirmed OA are randomized (1:1 computer generated sequence with random block size) to two parallel groups and will undergo either PRC or FCA. The study will be patient and assessor blinded.
Baseline data is collected preoperatively and is followed by a follow-up visits at 2 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 months, and 5, 10 years after the intervention. Unveiling of the allocation is at 12 months post-intervention.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Töölö Hospital (Helsinki University Hospital), Helsinki, Finland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Excision of the proximal carpal row - the scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum
Scaphoid excision and four-corner fusion with cannulated headless compression screws/dorsal plate
Time frame: 12 months
The PRWE comprises 15 questions to measure wrist pain and disability in daily activities. In PRWE patients rate wrist pain and disability from 0 to 10 and it consists two subscales: Pain and Function (0=best possible outcome, 10=worst possible outcome)
Time frame: 12 months
The QuickDASH is self-reported questionnaire and shortened version of DASH outcome measure to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in 11 dimensions in 1-5 scale (1=best possible outcome, 5=worst possible outcome)
Time frame: 12 months
The VAS is derived by health care professional question of pain in scale 0 to 10 (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain)
Time frame: 12 months
Global rating to treatment effect will be evaluated by question: "How would you rate the function of your hand compared to the situation before the treatment?". The options are in 5-step Likert scale from (-2) Much worse to (+2) Much better
Time frame: 12 months
Grip strength is measured with a dynamometer in kg as the mean of three measurements. It will be numbered in kg and percentage of the unaffected side
Time frame: 12 months
Wrist ROM is measured on both wrists with a handheld goniometer in degrees.
Time frame: 12 months
Incidence of complications (i.e. non-union, fracture, reoperation, infection, hematoma, iatrogenic tendon/nerve/arterial injury, complex regional pain syndrome) is recorded and compared between study groups.
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Quality-adjusted life years/months measured as a change in EQ-5D
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Jorma Ryhänen, adj. prof.
CONTACT
Samuli Aspinen, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Töölö Hospital
Other
A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Proximal ROw carpectOmy and Four-corner Fusion (PROOF) for Osteoarthritis of the Wrist
Acronym: PROOF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06917235
Ankylosis, Arthritis
Drammen, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT05412615
Wrist Osteoarthritis
Englewood, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05499559
Finger Osteoarthritis, Hand Osteoarthritis
Malmö, Skåne County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06814821
Arthritis, Joint Diseases
View Trial Details